Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Was An Anti-Feminist Organization Using Senate Time to Sell Guns?
Tangentially: it was an interesting insight somebody posted recently, that the gun industry push to create a "self defense" culture - where everybody walks around armed - may have begun as a reaction to gradually declining sales of guns for hunting. They're trying to create a new market niche.
Gayle Trotters little marketing push trying to get women to buy more gunsremember, the underlying principle of all gun proponent testimony is that gun profits should always be growingwas definitely an amusing one, as noted by Mother Jones. Women buy far fewer guns than men, so while this was supposed to be a Senate hearing, a large portion of it was Trotter using this free advertising opportunity to try to capture a new customer base that the gun industry struggles to reach. I debunked her nonsense at Slate, but it got me to thinking. What does the anti-feminist group Independent Womens Forum that Trotter was representing get out of giving the gun industry free, if unhinged advertising like this?
Watching
" target="_blank">this video, where Trotter imagined that young mothers frequently have confrontations with mysterious bad guys who are coming to take their babies* from themproper young mothers have lots, of course, since birth control is only for unarmed slutsit occurred to me why IWF agreed to provide this free marketing. This suits their larger mission as an organization. As I briefly outline at Slate, the IWF was started by a group of women supporting Clarence Thomas, primarily by claiming that women invent sexual harassment claims for the lulz. Since then, theyve dramatically expanded and one of their main objectives is to undermine efforts to end violence against women. I know; its gross. But its the truththey oppose VAWA, protest V-Day events aimed at fund-raising to end violence, heavily promote the claim that many to most rape victims are lying sluts, and promote the notion that reconciliation is the proper approach to domestic violence. If it walks like a duck, etc.
Watching
This testimony supported these larger goals. Trotter basically used her time there to promote the claim that real violence against womenyou might even call it legitimatelooks like strangers attacking women, often for movie bad guy reasons of being menancing for its own sake. By painting a picture where violence against women looks like gangs of thugs cornering good Christian women for gang rape or violence in the home as the result of bad guys coming for your babies,** she can distract from the reality, which is that most violence against women is at the hands of men they know.
The IWF will do anything to distract from this reality. They scare-monger about lying bitches who make up rape charges for the lulz, aggressively deny statistics that demonstrate how widespread the problem is, and, of course, write frequently about how the only real war on women is occuring in countries that dont have a white majority. The latter creates some weird juxtapositions, where theyll complain about how Indias police corruption leaves rape cases uninvestigated, buy angrily protest any attemptto improve the reporting of rape in our country. A charming quote from the latter piece that demonstrates what they think actually happened to women who file rape charges here: most college men who wake up next to a so-called butterface will usually just claim beer goggles! and high-five their friends. Yep, the claim is that menbeing so morally superior to womenreact to bad sexual choices by being a little dickish, but that women call the cops. Because, in wingnut minds, women are so incredibly stupid that they think the best way to handle sexual shame is to have the police and defense attorneys interrogate you about how much sex youve been having for the public record.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/31/why-was-an-anti-feminist-organization-using-senate-time-to-sell-guns/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 426 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post