Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,992 posts)
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 07:53 AM Jan 2012

The President said he’d fight for middle-class people like me, and he kept his promise

from the Obama for America blog: http://www.barackobama.com/news/entry/my-story


ON the three-year anniversary of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the bill’s namesake sent an email to her fellow Obama 2012 supporters:

My name is Lilly Ledbetter, and I was discriminated against because I’m a woman.

Some of you may have heard my story.

In 1998, after 19 years of service at a Goodyear factory, someone left an anonymous note in my mailbox listing the names and salaries of my male coworkers—who I learned that day were making at least 20 percent more than I was, even though many had less education, less training, and fewer years on the job.

I went to court and won, but in an appeal, the Supreme Court claimed I should have filed my complaint within six months of the first unfair paycheck. Of course, they didn’t say how I was supposed to fight for fair pay when I didn’t know I was being paid unfairly.

But that’s not why I’m writing you. I'm writing because President Obama heard about my case and went to work fighting for legislation that would prevent his two girls, and an entire generation of young women coming up in the workforce, from ever being disrespected in the same way. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act became the first piece of legislation he signed into law as president, exactly three years ago today.

Before he was elected, the President said he’d fight for middle-class people like me, and he kept his promise—not just on fair pay, but on so many other issues that matter to women.

President Obama didn’t have to make fair pay a priority. Lord knows he had enough to worry about those first few weeks in the White House.

But the President is driven by a strong sense of fairness, and the responsibility he believes we have to one another to correct injustice wherever we can.

Part of that comes from his own story. The President’s grandmother worked in a bank her whole life, and kept working there long after she hit the glass ceiling. Some of the very men she had trained climbed the corporate ladder ahead of her.

That’s part of why he continues to fight for bills like the Paycheck Fairness Act, which he supported in his State of the Union last week. And that’s why he fought for the Affordable Care Act and won—ending discrimination against women based on pre-existing conditions, and providing free preventive services like mammograms and contraception.

Growing up in the South, I learned the value of a good day’s work at a young age, picking and chopping cotton two seasons a year. It wasn’t until much later that I learned that hard work isn’t always enough when folks don’t have a President who’s looking out for them.

I’m excited to fight alongside President Obama in this election. I hope you’ll join us today.

Thanks,

Lilly
_____________________________

Three years after President Obama signed the historic fair pay legislation bearing her name, Lilly Ledbetter tells the story of why she stepped up to fight for equal pay for equal work. Watch the video to hear from the inspiration behind the first bill the President signed into law . . .




49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The President said he’d fight for middle-class people like me, and he kept his promise (Original Post) bigtree Jan 2012 OP
The Lilly Ledbetter was unequivocally good MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #1
Half truths, spin, and innuendo. emulatorloo Jan 2012 #11
Bullshit. MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #25
This seems like more "magic wand" stuff. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #28
If Obama had said: MannyGoldstein Jan 2012 #31
Still in LA LA land I see, where there are no Republicans emulatorloo Jan 2012 #38
Rep. Conyers: "Obama Demanded Social Security Cuts--Not GOP" MannyGoldstein Feb 2012 #45
I have tons of respect for Conyers. Don't insult him by comparing yourself to him. emulatorloo Feb 2012 #48
So then you agree with Conyers that Obama demanded cuts to Social Security MannyGoldstein Feb 2012 #49
As much as I we like his picks for economic positions they seem to be working so maybe we're wrong. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #43
Oh lordy....the inevitable Buttttttt Sheepshank Jan 2012 #13
"Pretty much on target for MG." Number23 Jan 2012 #27
The Lily Ledbetter Act was a good thing, MadHound Jan 2012 #2
And it's ALL Obama's fault! Who does he think he is??!?!?!? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #17
Just another DU'er who whose "worldview" leaves out the existence of Republicans. emulatorloo Jan 2012 #21
you are you fucking kidding? Skittles Jan 2012 #24
I was drinking a coke when I read this post... Rex Jan 2012 #29
you want I should kick your coke-spewing ass, Rex? Skittles Jan 2012 #32
... Rex Jan 2012 #33
Yes, I am forgetting how benevolent Republicans really are emulatorloo Jan 2012 #39
That was a historic day JustAnotherGen Jan 2012 #3
you summed that up perfectly, JustAnotherGen bigtree Jan 2012 #4
Good post malaise Jan 2012 #9
excellent post. emulatorloo Jan 2012 #12
Nicely done! Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #18
'But the President is driven by a strong sense of fairness' (except on marriage equality) Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #5
thank you, Bluenorthwest bigtree Jan 2012 #6
I did not enjoy making that point. Lilly is a heroic person, and that law with her name is Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #7
again, you make an excellent point bigtree Jan 2012 #8
I wonder....why a post acknowleding Lilly Ledbetter must be "pork barrelled" Sheepshank Jan 2012 #15
I get what you're saying (and I greatly appreciate it) bigtree Jan 2012 #19
I would agree bigtree JustAnotherGen Jan 2012 #34
An excellent point emulatorloo Jan 2012 #14
...and I maintain and strongly feel that if re-elected, he'll be free to do so. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #20
Absolutely. That's my main goal for GOTV this election. emulatorloo Jan 2012 #22
Mine, too! I live in MD, which is a very BLUE state. And what's more, my governor Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #23
I agree too JustAnotherGen Jan 2012 #35
As a black woman myself who is incredibly proud of her gay father, I'm praying that Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #36
I don't know that we gave up on Corzine JustAnotherGen Feb 2012 #46
I had forgotten about the Green candidate. You're right. Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2012 #47
^ bigtree Jan 2012 #10
But we were told that he "lacked moral compass" and just gives "pretty speeches." Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #16
Sincere question, what was Obama's history with this bill? TiberiusB Jan 2012 #26
well, I do remember Sen. Obama campaigning for the legislation bigtree Jan 2012 #30
Thanks for this! And from the WSJ, no less. There are too many people who Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #37
It is called "Damage Control" emulatorloo Jan 2012 #40
All salient points, but not exactly what I was asking.. TiberiusB Jan 2012 #42
I don't know what my family and I would be doing if not for Obama UrbScotty Jan 2012 #41
Wages have not gone up in 30 years.... lib2DaBone Jan 2012 #44
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
1. The Lilly Ledbetter was unequivocally good
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:03 AM
Jan 2012

and I thank Obama for that.

But three years into Obama's presidency, the middle class has shrunk dramatically and continues to shrink. The three "free" trade bills he passed a few months ago, slavishly bailing out bankers while letting the 99% wither on the vine, the failure to tackle soaring health care costs, and the rest of his Third Way agenda have been seriously disappointing and tremendously damaging.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
25. Bullshit.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 07:16 PM
Jan 2012

Working Americans are doing awful, and the ranks of those in poverty are growing.

Do you think Lincoln should have fired his losing generals? Or was he not acknowledging that the Confederacy existed?

FarLeftFist

(6,161 posts)
28. This seems like more "magic wand" stuff.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:21 PM
Jan 2012

Priority 1 was SLOW the economic crisis. Even Obama himself acknowledges that in order to do so he had to make some pretty unpopular decisions. It was a full throttle downward spiral and he had to act fast. It really wasn't the time to restructure and change the entire system with legislation that would be holed up for months. Like I said he had to act quickly as 800,000 jobs a month were being lost. Priority 2 is to get people back to work, but jobs bills are still holed up in congress/senate. In between he has made some huge progress and hopefully in term 2 many more advances can be made. This is going to be a long tough fight, no reason to give up now.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
31. If Obama had said:
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 12:45 AM
Jan 2012

"this is the best I can get, but real unemployment will still be way over 15% for many years-", then I might buy that he did the best he could - but he hired credentialed arch-foes of the middle class, like Summers and Geithner, and claimed that unemployment would not surpass 8% with his work - meanwhile economists with *good* track records, like Krugman and Stiglitz, told it like it was and were banished from the Obama White House.

And then he tried to slash Social Security. Credibility destroyed.

Let's face it: at best, Obama is a mediocre president. At worst, he is a ne'er-do-well. And yes, he sucks less than the Republicans (the Third Way rallying cry).

emulatorloo

(44,118 posts)
38. Still in LA LA land I see, where there are no Republicans
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 11:36 AM
Jan 2012

Last edited Tue Jan 31, 2012, 12:35 PM - Edit history (8)

Anybody who has payed attention knows that every Democratic attempt to improve the economy have been blocked. Because the Republicans main goal is to keep the economy bad and blame in on Democrats/Obama in 2012.

Your "analysis" will all ways be flawed and lack credibility as long as it is out of touch with reality.

"And then he tried to slash Social Security. Credibility destroyed. "

This is great example Manny Goldstein Spin and Bullshit System®. Contextless, and pretends that talk about reducing overhead is = "SLASHING" of benefits.

And then you act as Ryan Plan to actually destroy Social Security and Medicare does not exist. And has overwhelming support from Congressional Republicans and the Republicans running for President.

I am sure you are going to come up with another speculation as fact rant, filled with hyperbolic language.

This is the bubble you've constructed for yourself. Oversimplified bumper-sticker sloganeering, contextless, hyperbolic, doctrinaire.

I accept that about you. I will assure you this is not a "personal attack" because I really like you as a person. I enjoy your sense of humor etc etc. I do not think you are a "BAD PERSON", you seem like a real decent guy.

This has only to do with your rhetorical tactics on DU.

IMHO, your posts and original threads are really damaging the reputation of DU'ers who have legitimate reasoned criticisms re Obama's policies.

They are suffering from guilt-by-association.

There are about 10 Very Loud and Very Prolific DU posters who use similar deceptive rhetorical strategies as you who also live in a world where there are no Republicans. (but sadly without any sense of humor whatsoever.)

I hope at some point that posters with reasoned criticisms with Obama's policies realize that and start pushing back on your rhetorical tactics as well.






emulatorloo

(44,118 posts)
48. I have tons of respect for Conyers. Don't insult him by comparing yourself to him.
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 02:34 PM
Feb 2012

because there is no comparison.

Conyers' thoughtful analysis, the stellar hearings he conducted when Dems were in the majority, and his service to the country and active commitment to Democratic principles have nothing in common with the Manny Goldstein Rhetorical Tactics® of snark, deceptive innuendo, and simplistic sloganeering.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
49. So then you agree with Conyers that Obama demanded cuts to Social Security
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 09:57 PM
Feb 2012

Do you, like Obama, think that cutting Social Security is a good thing?

For bonus points: please provide an example where I've been deceptive. If you can't find one, I expect that you'll apologize.

FarLeftFist

(6,161 posts)
43. As much as I we like his picks for economic positions they seem to be working so maybe we're wrong.
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 06:13 PM
Jan 2012

Imagine if republicans didn't exist for a moment, you know his idea of a utopia would be right up your alley. Now compare his idea of utopia to the RWs idea of utopia. Seeee.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
13. Oh lordy....the inevitable Buttttttt
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 01:42 PM
Jan 2012

the predicatble red herring to de-rail and rediret the discussion away from the acknolwedgement that Obama did something very right.

Pretty much on target for MG.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
27. "Pretty much on target for MG."
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:04 PM
Jan 2012

Well, SOMEBODY has to remind everyone here that the president's a failure. Even in a thread lauding him for the good work that he's done.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
2. The Lily Ledbetter Act was a good thing,
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:08 AM
Jan 2012

Something that should have been done years ago.

But the fact of the matter is that real world wages are still declining, and the middle class is still shrinking.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/realer.nr0.htm

emulatorloo

(44,118 posts)
39. Yes, I am forgetting how benevolent Republicans really are
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 11:39 AM
Jan 2012

Last edited Tue Jan 31, 2012, 01:00 PM - Edit history (6)

and how hard they have worked to pass such important legislation to help America and the economy. Such as the Ryan Plan. And their efforts to improve the prospects of the middle class and improve wages for working Americans by introducing bills designed to ban abortion and take away gay rights.

I guess I have also forgotten about Obama's long stint at Bain Capital, where he destroyed companies and outsourced jobs for personal profit. While Romney worked tirelessly to help laid off workers.

I do apologize to MadHound. She does indeed know that Republicans exist. In fact, she's been advocating recently that it might be best to allow Republicans to gain full control of the government in 2012.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=226567

JustAnotherGen

(31,816 posts)
3. That was a historic day
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:17 AM
Jan 2012

And cannot be discounted by anyone. But the next step is to get A Paycheck Fairness Act. The senate fell two votes short of the brass ring in 2010.
http://www.aclu.org/blog/womens-rights/sad-day-equal-pay-not-end

That's what's needed to take it to the next level. IE

*Allow employees to disclose salary information with co-workers despite workplace rules prohibiting disclosure
*Require employers to show any wage discrepancies are based on actual and verifiable requirements and special skills and education without regard for gender.
*Whistleblower clause - Prohibit retaliation by employers against women raise inequity in pay as an issue.
*Provide resources to help American women who did not learn that you even COULD negotiate salary - learn that you can - and here's how.


But it won't happen with the House or the Senate as they exist today. That's not President Obamas fault - just as it wasn't his fault women didn't have people in the Senate willing to do the right thing. He would have signed it had it passed. So it's not just about fighting for the President - it's about giving him a House and Senate that won't obstruct like a bunch of petulant little brats.

bigtree

(85,992 posts)
4. you summed that up perfectly, JustAnotherGen
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:27 AM
Jan 2012

thanks for listing the related four initiatives that need to be addressed in the future.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. 'But the President is driven by a strong sense of fairness' (except on marriage equality)
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:46 AM
Jan 2012

'and the responsibility he believes we have to one another to correct injustice wherever we can.' (except the injustice of marriage inequality, that's God's will!!!)

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
7. I did not enjoy making that point. Lilly is a heroic person, and that law with her name is
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:58 AM
Jan 2012

important. I do get tired of the rhetorical indulgence which excludes reality. Justice and equality are as the title says for 'people like Lilly' not people like me. If justice for some justice at all? I think not.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
15. I wonder....why a post acknowleding Lilly Ledbetter must be "pork barrelled"
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 01:47 PM
Jan 2012

with something the poster sees as lacking?

If a postive bill, such as Ledbetter, is to be associated with other acts of Obama, why not couple it with Osama Bin Laden? Why not couple it with eliminating the insurance companies ability to limit maximum coverage payments, or preexisting conditions? Huh....why is it always so important to temper a huge positive with something negative?

There is something else clearly going on here.....the attempt to dampen enthusiasm is pretty ripe here and getting old, extremely predictable and frankly more annoying that acheiving it's intended goal.

bigtree

(85,992 posts)
19. I get what you're saying (and I greatly appreciate it)
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 01:52 PM
Jan 2012

. . . but I'll take the poster's issue with the phrase in the Lilly Ledbetter email -- "the responsibility he believes we have to one another to correct injustice wherever we can" -- as sincere, correct, and on point.

JustAnotherGen

(31,816 posts)
34. I would agree bigtree
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 07:52 AM
Jan 2012

And I am HEARING what the poster is saying but . . . Jobs first in Tandem with a Paycheck Fairness Act.

Imagine you are a gay couple - two black women - married and TRYING to obtain the American dream, raise a family in a food, shelter, medical secure environment. You work in let's say - a wireless carrier's headquarters in Open Development. You know a gay Caucasian male couple in the Marketing Communications Department.

You - the black female couple are only making .61$ for every dollar the two men make. The sexual orientation of the two men is not up for consideration and neither is that of the two women. Simple their gender is in play.

Now if it is two latina/hispanic women they are making $.52 on the dollar.

Caucasian women - $.77 on the dollar.

I'm not 100% certain as the military is shrouded in mystery - but take them out of that telecom environment and put any of these four couples in the military. Those women can serve openly, but because of their gender, they serve at less pay.

Now look at our economy . . . Imagine in January 2013 we have this President, and majorities in the House and Senate who can get an intensive infrastructure development bill passed. We need this. We do. The pay law passed in the early 1960's STILL did not catch women up with men. It's been almost 40 years - and we are still left behind. Any wages paid need to be paid fairly at these Team America jobs. If you are a government contractor - and you aren't paying a fair and equal wage - you should eligible for punishment.

We can't wait anymore - straight women or gay women. We are attending university and obtaining advanced degrees at record levels. We are delaying marriage and children (I'm a perfect example of this - getting married in April at 39) in order to pay off our debts/student loans, advance in our careers by being able to move at the drop of a hat (no need to worry about husband and children), and staying late at work so our male counterparts can go coach their daughters soccer team. Enough! We've paid our dues for team America and I don't want it pushed aside anymore.

I am familiar with unequal pay. I've felt it's sting directly - when I was hired onto a team and had to deal with an insubordinate male who could not take direction or instruction for a woman he felt was beneath him (part of that was cultural) but who ran with The Boys Club. He made 11k more a year than me with less education AND marketing experienve (previous positions all in IT) rolled in at 9:15 AM, left at 4:45 but was the fair haired boy.

By the way - I'm a black (bi-racial) woman and my company gets accolades for being a great place to work for women, blacks, working mothers, etc etc. Understand how bad my situation looks?

I'm not the only one. Because this shit spreads like wildfire there. All we need is a law that allows me to share what I know about that gay male couple that I am friends with - and the 14 women at my company who have approached me- without getting them fired. I need to be able to show that org chart AND my former employees HR Profile without fear of retaliation. Those 14 other women have documentation too.


I'm not asking for homosexuals to wait - not for a thing. I'm asking them to think of the gay women that will not be able to prosper at the rate a gay male couple will. . . Just because those two women had the misfortune to be born women.


We've waited too. And there is no point in two women getting married and having a family if they work so damn hard to provide - but never get paid what they are worth. . . So life is a constant economic struggle.

Now ask me how I feel about the book/movie The Help. they are a heckava group of "girls" but no one wants the ugly truth about why they had to take those jobs in the first place!

emulatorloo

(44,118 posts)
14. An excellent point
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 01:44 PM
Jan 2012

as long as you can also acknowledge that Obama admin has done some positive things, such as justice dept refusal to enforce DOMA.

I agree that Obama should make a strong statement in favor of marriage equality. Everybody should be allowed to marry the person they love, and everyone should have the same legal rights. I still have hope that he will do the right thing on this.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
20. ...and I maintain and strongly feel that if re-elected, he'll be free to do so.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 01:53 PM
Jan 2012

Let's give him a PROGRESSIVE super-majority in Congress. That would help the situation, since it will require congressional action to address DOMA.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
23. Mine, too! I live in MD, which is a very BLUE state. And what's more, my governor
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:31 PM
Jan 2012

has bravely stood up for marriage equality. Since it is HIS second term, he has nothing to lose. The last Democratic governor we had attempted to push marriage equality through, but it failed in the Senate as well.

My goal for this election is to go back to work in VA and PA. Virginia was very difficult in 2008. I'm assuming that it's going to be that much tougher this year.

However, we got some great progressive candidates running for office everywhere. The ultimate goal is not just getting Obama reelected in MD, PA, and VA, but giving a MORE progressive Congress to work with.

I strongly believe that if we can accomplish this feat, Congress WILL overturn DOMA, and the president WILL sign on!!

JustAnotherGen

(31,816 posts)
35. I agree too
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 07:57 AM
Jan 2012

But even at the old DU - my chief concern was equal pay for women. All women regardless of race or orientation. Truthfully, gay marriage and fair pay cannot exist in separate vacuums. Ditto race and sex discrimination.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
36. As a black woman myself who is incredibly proud of her gay father, I'm praying that
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 09:15 AM
Jan 2012

state by state, FULL equality rights will be extended to all. Dad lives in Jersey with a Repuke governor who has threatened to veto marriage equality should it pass the legislature. Here in Maryland where I live, the governor has been awesome in pushing for gender equality AND anti-discrimination legislation that include sexual orientation. We have a long way to go, but we're getting there.

The people of Jersey were quick to give up on Corzine, but I think they're learning a lesson now having to deal with Christie.

JustAnotherGen

(31,816 posts)
46. I don't know that we gave up on Corzine
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 07:35 AM
Feb 2012

It wasn't out of petulance. A lot of Democratics I know went with Daggett's Green Agenda. Some just stayed home. Some of us voted out of loyalty to high principles. And at the end of the day, NJ will always be corrupt. Face. Palm. groan.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
47. I had forgotten about the Green candidate. You're right.
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 01:45 PM
Feb 2012

Jersey has always been corrupt. It's the NE equivalent to Louisiana, and the Midwest equivalent to Illinois.

Fingers crossed that the Jersey bill gets through with enough political pressure on Christie.

TiberiusB

(487 posts)
26. Sincere question, what was Obama's history with this bill?
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 07:18 PM
Jan 2012

The bill passed the Senate on January 22 and the House on the 27th, with President Obama signing it on the 29th, just 9 days after his inauguration (7 days, if you discount the weekend). Besides promising to sign the bill, what did he do to help get it passed? It seems like it was practically gift wrapped and put on his desk, yet I get the impression from these posts that he, and he alone, passed the bill into law. In fact, it seems that without the help of a handful of Republicans, and yes, that is irony you're tasting, the bill wouldn't have made it out of Congress. Of course, given the makeup of the GOP today, such a thing would almost certainly never happen again (it practically didn't happen then), but I think that if Obama is to be praised for signing the bill, then Congress should be equally praised for getting it to his desk. Or is the President solely responsible for the good bills that pass and Congress is 100% on the hook for the bad stuff?

Unless I'm missing something, obviously, hence the question.

bigtree

(85,992 posts)
30. well, I do remember Sen. Obama campaigning for the legislation
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 09:19 PM
Jan 2012

. . . giving McCain a hard time for his opposition to the bill. It was a campaign pledge of his to nullify the 2007 court decision in Ledbetter vs. Goodyear. It was the first bill he signed when he achieved office.

I really don't know why you think his role in this is diminished just because Congress put it on his desk.

Then-Sen. Obama co-sponsored a bill that would have given employees more time to file suit -- the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act -- and Democrats largely supported it. But Republicans overwhelmingly opposed the measure as anti-business. President Bush, calling the bill a job killer, threatened to veto it, and although the House had passed a similar bill, the Senate, unable to amass enough votes to hold off a filibuster, did not vote.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/10/opinion/ed-ledbetter10

(August 31, 2008). "Obama’s First Shot at Palin Focuses on Equal Pay". The Wall Street Journal.

After praising Republican John McCain‘s new running mate the past two days, Democrat Barack Obama on Sunday lobbed his first salvo at Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

She “seems like a very nice person,” he began, repeating remarks he’s made often since McCain announced her selection on Friday. “But I’ve got to say she’s opposed, like John McCain is, to equal pay for equal work. That doesn’t make sense to me.”

Asked if Obama was referring to Palin’s own position on pay disparities, a campaign aide cited McCain’s “clear record opposing equal pay,” which “Palin is tasked with promoting.”

McCain in April opposed a bill to overturn a Supreme Court decision limiting pay discrimination lawsuits. Senate Republicans blocked the measure, which was intended to reconsider the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, an important cause among women’s advocates. McCain, who skipped the vote because he was campaigning in Louisiana, has said the act would have encouraged frivolous litigation harmful to employers.

read: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/08/31/obamas-first-shot-at-palin-focuses-on-equal-pay/
 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
37. Thanks for this! And from the WSJ, no less. There are too many people who
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 09:17 AM
Jan 2012

because they are disappointed in this president simply cannot give him any credit when he does something right!!

emulatorloo

(44,118 posts)
40. It is called "Damage Control"
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 11:54 AM
Jan 2012

Any fact that contradicts the 'obama-evil-enemy-and-tool-of-the-1%' narrative causes them to freak out. IMHO, They have had particular trouble with the Romney/Bain Capital revelations, so there has been a huge push to double down on the 'obama-and-democrats-are-no-different-than-republicans' narrative.

Now this is not true of most DU'ers who have legit complaints about Dems and Obama policies. IMHO those DU'ers are suffering now because of guilt by association. I would like to see them push back on some of these false memes and narratives that a handful of VERY LOUD Du'ers are pushing.

TiberiusB

(487 posts)
42. All salient points, but not exactly what I was asking..
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 01:27 PM
Jan 2012

I was aware of his campaign promises, and the co-sponsorship of the bill, but I was more curious if there was actually any battle to get this through Congress in time for his inauguration (or shortly thereafter, actually). It seemed to struggle right up until the Fall of 2008, and then it suddenly broke through. Was any horse trading involved, or was Obama's enormous popularity and ascension to the White House enough to win the needed votes?

The House passed the bill on the 27th, with a slightly odd "swap" between the GOP and the Democrats.

House Republicans that voted for passage:

Ed Whitfield (Kentucky)
Don Young (Alaska)
Chris Smith (New Jersey)

House Democrats that voted against it:

Travis Childers (Mississippi)
Allen Boyd (Florida)
Parker Griffith (Alabama)

So, effectively, the 3 members of each party that voted with the other team cancelled each other out, accomplishing nothing. Was it known that three Democrats were going to jump ship and so three Republicans were pursued to offset the loss? The bill would have passed regardless, so it's just a minor oddity.

The Senate is the more curious vote, with the bill passing, 61-36.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2009-14

Five Republicans voted for the bill, effectively providing the margin for a filibuster proof victory (no Democrats voted against the bill in the Senate, as far as I know). Why the change? Even then, the GOP was staunchly against passing pretty much anything populist, or that might benefit the Democrats.

My impression, and that's all it is, really, is that the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was seen as a possible early "slam dunk" for our new President and a chance to give him a bit of an early wind in his sails. That being the case, a modest push was put into play in Congress to wrap up the needed votes and get the bill to the President's desk ASAP before the inevitable partisan bickering had a chance to drag down his momentum.

 

lib2DaBone

(8,124 posts)
44. Wages have not gone up in 30 years....
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 07:52 PM
Jan 2012

Fair play legislation is good.. but Mr. Obama also signed the Korean free trade deal that will cost America many jobs. One step forward.. two steps back...

Unless you get money into the hands of working America and improve the real estate market.. nothing will change.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The President said he’d f...