Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:46 PM Jan 2012

In his imaginary role as 2012 GOP nominee, Gingrich REJECTS reporter-moderated Obama debates

Gingrich: I wouldn't accept debate versus Obama moderated by reporters
By NBC's Jamie Novogrod and msnbc.com's Michael O'Brien

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/30/10271619-gingrich-i-wouldnt-accept-debate-versus-obama-moderated-by-reporters

"As your nominee, I will not accept debates in the fall in which the reporters are the moderators," Gingrich said at a rally in Pensacola. "We don’t need to have a second Obama person at the debate."

The threat is in keeping with the scorn with which the former House speaker has treated the press throughout the campaign, particularly at debates. Gingrich most notably won a standing ovation by angrily dismissing a question at a South Carolina debate having to do with extramarital allegations made by an ex-wife.

Moreover, Gingrich has made his debating prowess a central selling point of his candidacy, promising fantastical showdowns with Obama in the general election. A frequent applause line for Gingrich, for instance, is his promise to challenge the president to seven, three-hour Lincoln-Douglas style debates.

As a reminder, though, presidential debates are governed by the Commission on Presidential Debates, which have organized the general election debates since 1998. The commission has already set the number of presidential debates in 2012 at three, slated for this October. The moderators in these debates have not been announced, but will almost certainly be members of the media.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In his imaginary role as 2012 GOP nominee, Gingrich REJECTS reporter-moderated Obama debates (Original Post) Amerigo Vespucci Jan 2012 OP
For all his pronounced and perceived genius sharp_stick Jan 2012 #1
Fine. Let the League of Women Voters take it back.. and annabanana Jan 2012 #2
Would love to see it! VWolf Jan 2012 #5
"I will only accept a 'debate' moderated by Rush Limbaugh, with questions only zbdent Jan 2012 #3
Gingrich: I wouldn't accept a debate versus Obama. Wait Wut Jan 2012 #4
frankly, gingrinch wont be debating potus anyway, frankly leftyohiolib Jan 2012 #6
Just think if this is how he is going to act what happens if he gets elected president. He isn't southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #7
John McCain is right surfdog Jan 2012 #8
Personally, I think a steel cage or ladder match would be much better TV. TreasonousBastard Jan 2012 #9

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
1. For all his pronounced and perceived genius
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:50 PM
Jan 2012

I'm afraid Newt is pretty much nothing more than just a baseline fucking moron.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
2. Fine. Let the League of Women Voters take it back.. and
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:51 PM
Jan 2012

let them impose Roberts Rules for the debate. No argument here.

VWolf

(3,944 posts)
5. Would love to see it!
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:54 PM
Jan 2012

The pubs can't win a debate without shouting down their opponent.
They've proven this time and time again.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
3. "I will only accept a 'debate' moderated by Rush Limbaugh, with questions only
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:51 PM
Jan 2012

submitted by the Heritage Foundation, and 'judged' by the TEA Party."

Again, the diva is trying to mold the stage in his favor ...

(heard on the radio ... Gingrich complained when the moderator told the audience to act like adults, not like they were in the front row of a WWE live event ... and then Gingrich complained when the audience was allowed to shout ... just ... they were shouting AGAINST Gingrich ... crybaby ...)

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
6. frankly, gingrinch wont be debating potus anyway, frankly
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:54 PM
Jan 2012

any debate like that ,frankly , anyone quoting that would , frankly, be creating a falsehood, frankly

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
7. Just think if this is how he is going to act what happens if he gets elected president. He isn't
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:56 PM
Jan 2012

going to support any proposals of democrats or talk to any liberal reports. Only Fox? Funny everyone has noticed how republicans don't want to go on liberal shows. What are they afraid of.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In his imaginary role as ...