Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 05:16 PM Jan 2012

Demographics of a Late 1960s Anti-War Protest

Back in the late 60s, I was very involved in the anti-war movement in the Washington DC area. Organizing large protests, like the ones at the Pentagon was some of the stuff I was involved with. They involved thousands of people sometimes, and the cast of characters was always interesting. Here are some of the typical characters who participated in the protests at one level or another:

Celebrity Organizers - Most often, these folks didn't really do that much, except to show up, speak, and help attract others. An interesting group, for sure.
Actual Organizers - Kind of the central committee for each protest. Smart people who knew what the event would likely turn out to be, and were willing to put in long hours trying to put things together so that the protest would be effective and relatively safe. Maybe a dozen people, at most. Their contribution was ideas and strategy.
Dedicated Workers - These folks did all the heavy lifting. They produced the posters, distributed and hung them, and did all the enormous amount of work that actually made these things actually happen. Some were specialists in getting parade permits or writing press releases, etc. Absolutely essential people.
Hard-Core Protesters - Front line folks. Completely committed to the cause and willing to stand at the front of the crowd and take whatever abuse came along. They got arrested, tear gassed, etc. again and again, and always came back for more. You could count on them showing up whenever things were happening. They were smart and effective and willing. Essential.
Marshals - These absolutely amazing people had a unique ability to calm down people and get them to stay out of trouble and go where they were needed. When things got hairy, they helped keep things together and the crowds more or less under control.
The Talent - You had to have music. You had to have something to keep protests going, excited, and to attract large numbers. Sometimes they were great. Sometimes they were a PITA. Along with them came roadies and groupies and hangers-on. If there was a good talent handler in the organization, that was a wonderful thing. If not, then the talent was a major hassle.
The Crazies - They were always there. Hotheads, and wackos, and a strange assortment of people whose priorities and behavior was almost never possible to understand or predict. They kept the Marshals busy. If you weren't on them, they'd provoke something - guaranteed. Thank goodness for the Marshals. Most of the time, they managed to keep this group from infecting the event.
The Undercovers - The bigger the event, the more of these that showed up. Sometimes they were obvious, and sometimes not. Occasionally, one would make it into the Actual Organizers. That was not a good thing. Sometimes, others were hard to tell from the crazies. They were always there, always trying to get a foothold in the organization. Sometimes they had good dope. That was a sure sign.
The Serious Protesters - These were the many, many people who showed up and participated in whatever protest was happening. They knew how things went, were loud and vocal, had their own signs, would pick up a chant instantly, and made the protest work. Some would help the marshals keep the crowd under control but all were there for the very reason the event was happening. They were great.
The Mob - Everyone else who showed up. Some came for The Talent. Some came to get high. Some came to hook up. Some came just because it was something to do. Mostly, they stayed back in the crowd and added sheer numbers to it. Few got in trouble. Few were ever arrested. Few really knew what was going on or why the protest was happening. That was always fine. They were there. They'd join a chant and make noise.
The Media - Too few of these, most of the time. Guiding Celebrity Organizers to them was important. Getting a few minutes on the news with an interview with one of the Celebrity Organizers was a very high priority.

I'm not active in this stuff any more. I wonder if the same demographics are still applicable.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Warpy

(111,106 posts)
1. And 95% were under 30, except for the media
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 05:20 PM
Jan 2012

I'm always a little astonished by what we managed to accomplish considering how hamfisted most of us were.

Our social stuff was mostly realized, to the disgust of our elders.

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
2. True, although there were always some older folks around.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 05:24 PM
Jan 2012

There was one old socialist/communist/anarchist I was friends with. He had a lot of wisdom and contributed some excellent ideas. But, you're right, it was mostly an under-30 crowd all around.

There was an incredible amount of energy flowing. I think that was the reason for the success we had.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
4. No internet either--FLYERS, some made on a mimeograph machine!
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 06:58 PM
Jan 2012

Stapled or taped to phone poles, bulletin boards, in bathrooms in "cool" clubs, in laundromats--wherever.

Oh, and phone-a-friend....you called your friends, they called their friends, on those LAND LINE phones, you'd sometimes go as a group, if someone had wheels, or you'd take public transport and go looking for your friends...it's a miracle anyone was able to meet up at all!

It's very different now. Internet, cellphones, twitter, the continuous recording of every second of every day by dozens if not hundreds of people at the demonstrations--an entirely different paradigm. Also, the whole "protest in place" thing is a very different aspect, now. Sure, there was the occasional "take over" of a college admin building way back when, but the focus really was more on the very act of marching in large (preferably overwhelming) numbers, rallying at a central location with speeches/music, etc., going home after it was all done, then doing it again a week later or so.

MineralMan

(146,241 posts)
6. Yup. And yet, we managed to turn out large crowds.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:36 PM
Jan 2012

It's so much easier now to communicate with people, but I guess everyone looked for the posters, then.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
7. We talked TO people, too, back then. In-person communication was
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:39 PM
Jan 2012

more valued back then, I think. Now people text and tweet to avoid having to converse. It's just a different set of priorities.

I can't imagine how we got by without caller ID, too--imagine having to pick up the phone these days without already knowing who was there!

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
8. That's part of the reason our elected officials
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:40 PM
Jan 2012

don't listen to their constituents these days.

It's pretty easy to delete a bunch of e-mails and texts every day. But when the post office is dropping a thousand letters a day off into your office, you need to do something just to make it stop!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. I am a fan of post cards for that very reason.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:46 PM
Jan 2012

Anything in an envelope goes through enhanced screening due to someone putting something nasty in it.

Postcards, though, don't--they get right to the Hill. People should send more postcards to their reps--and maybe even use their computers to vent their ire on both sides (clever art on one side, a comment and the address on the other).

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
12. 100% agreed.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 09:55 PM
Jan 2012

It certainly is much harder to ignore 1000 postcards sitting on your desk than it is to hit "mark all" and "delete" on your computer.

Never thought about the postcard thing, forgot all about the mail scares, thanks for the tip

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
10. I have noticed people of all age and income demograohics at the ones today I have been to.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:53 PM
Jan 2012

There were mainly three groups. Organizers, political groups, and willing participants to do their part. It has been different than those antiwar protests I participated in when I was young (except for occasional singers and guitar players).

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
11. Of course, those are not demographics. Here is a demographic statistic from a recent
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 09:19 PM
Jan 2012

Occupy Portland action:
25 arrested, average age: 50. People arrested age 60 and older: 8

Another: 51 arrested. Ages: 16-63

With so many older people in Occupy actions, one has to conclude that many of them actually are the same people who were present at other actions in earlier times.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Demographics of a Late 19...