Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 10:12 PM Mar 2013

Rep. Ed Orcutt responds, apologizes for 'confusing' email about bicyclists and CO2

http://bikeportland.org/2013/03/04/rep-ed-orcutt-responds-apologizes-for-email-confusion-83716

As you probably know by now, Washington State Representative Ed Orcutt has gained national notoriety for his comments that bicycling pollutes the environment. Before running our story on Saturday, I contacted Rep. Orcutt for a clarification about his comments. This morning I heard back. In an email Orcutt admits his comments were "over the top." Read the full email below:

... First of all, let me apologize for the carbon emissions line of an e-mail which has caused so much concern within the bicycle community. It was over the top and I admit is not one which should enter into the conversation regarding bicycles.

Although I have always recognized that bicycling emits less carbon than cars, I see I did a poor job of indicating that within my e-mail. My point was that by not driving a car, a cyclist was not necessarily having a zero-carbon footprint. In looking back, it was not a point worthy of even mentioning so, again, I apologize – both for bringing it up and for the wording of the e-mail.

... Again, I do apologize for the carbon line in the e-mail and any confusion it has created. I look forward to working on reasonable solutions to the problems cyclists are having with infrastructure.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Ed Orcutt responds, apologizes for 'confusing' email about bicyclists and CO2 (Original Post) Newsjock Mar 2013 OP
I think he means 'confused', not confusing htuttle Mar 2013 #1
IOW, "I got my ass handed to me". bluedigger Mar 2013 #2
could have saved a lot of words by saying "I Lied" rurallib Mar 2013 #4
That would indicate actual knowledge of the facts. bluedigger Mar 2013 #5
Idiot. GodlessBiker Mar 2013 #3
On the bright side, bmbmd Mar 2013 #6
This "backpedaling" brought to you by Big Oil PAC of Washington rustydog Mar 2013 #7
Yes I am sure they did not like exboyfil Mar 2013 #8

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
8. Yes I am sure they did not like
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 12:17 AM
Mar 2013

the analysis that showed it was 10 to 20 times more CO2 efficient to bike than drive. Folks were proposing a comparable tax structure based on carbon emissions. It would be worth the tax on bikes to get a comparable tax on automobiles based on carbon emissions.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Ed Orcutt responds, ...