Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This time next week there will be a new Pope. And I'm sick with worry. (Original Post) CK_John Mar 2013 OP
Nobody pays attention to what a pope says anymore jsr Mar 2013 #1
That really isn't true--that "nobody pays attention to what a pope says"...(though I wish it were) hlthe2b Mar 2013 #35
If you are "long lapsed" why should you care? Hekate Mar 2013 #2
North America and Europe aren't the entire world, you see. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2013 #38
Long lapsed myself....but murray hill farm Mar 2013 #43
Chances are they will choose a reactionary false prophet to which Dawson Leery Mar 2013 #3
no... i think the GOP has the corner on the False Prophet market.. rabid_byter Mar 2013 #4
Not quite. Zoeisright Mar 2013 #18
I don't think the world ignores a pope, combined with an opus dei Supreme Court CK_John Mar 2013 #5
Is Anthony Kennedy opus dei? Dawson Leery Mar 2013 #6
Scalia, Thomas, Roberts ... Hekate Mar 2013 #19
It's an interesting religious make up on the current court Aerows Mar 2013 #34
I forgot about Alito. Hekate Mar 2013 #48
I have heard nothing regarding Roberts having any Opus Dei association. Dawson Leery Mar 2013 #45
Just curious... how would you feel if O'Malley were picked? MannyGoldstein Mar 2013 #7
No American will be chosen BainsBane Mar 2013 #9
You're almost certainly right. But... MannyGoldstein Mar 2013 #12
The American church has long been a thorn in the side of the Vatican BainsBane Mar 2013 #14
O'Malley would be a good choice and for that reason Raven Mar 2013 #27
Because we are sinner davidpdx Mar 2013 #30
No, because the Vatican considers us BainsBane Mar 2013 #44
As we should be davidpdx Mar 2013 #46
When was the last time Control-Z Mar 2013 #8
I worry about someone who believes it's ok to kill gays or nurses giving polio shots. CK_John Mar 2013 #11
What makes you think he will be anti-science? BainsBane Mar 2013 #10
Sedevacantists aside, they're probably the least backwards of the major religions on science Posteritatis Mar 2013 #39
SPOILER ALERT: Homophobic & misogynistic. JaneyVee Mar 2013 #13
My prediction: The next pope will speak Spanish. JDPriestly Mar 2013 #15
I think it will 840high Mar 2013 #17
That would be the smart thing for the cardinals to do Nevernose Mar 2013 #21
Someone wants the job: Fire Walk With Me Mar 2013 #16
+1 n/t GiveMeFreedom Mar 2013 #20
OP: unlax. There's not a chance there's a new pope next week. These things take time. Lots of dimbear Mar 2013 #22
The last conclave only lasted a day and a half. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2013 #37
Bookmarked demwing Mar 2013 #42
And not 4 days later... demwing Mar 2013 #50
PWNED! dimbear Mar 2013 #53
There's no risk of anyone anywhere near as bad as the Taliban, but I'm not optimistic. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2013 #23
What persuades you of this? nt sibelian Mar 2013 #24
The pope has no relevance to me. hobbit709 Mar 2013 #25
Ignorance asking: no_hypocrisy Mar 2013 #26
Cardinals only need apply. aristocles Mar 2013 #28
Thanks. I wondered as a Supreme Court justice need not be a lawyer no_hypocrisy Mar 2013 #29
That was rescinded about a century later Posteritatis Mar 2013 #36
Did some more research. You're correct. aristocles Mar 2013 #41
I'm not a big fan of the Catholic Church so I really don't care and neither should anyone else davidpdx Mar 2013 #31
It will be a sexist homophobic hypocrite. Which sexist homophobic hypocrite does not really Bluenorthwest Mar 2013 #32
If the pick is limited to the very Cardinals elevated by the past two Popes, it would seem... hlthe2b Mar 2013 #33
Good. I hope the do find the most batshit crazy one. idwiyo Mar 2013 #40
I do, too. I think it will hasten the demise of the church. Arugula Latte Mar 2013 #51
I think I know who they're going to pick... backscatter712 Mar 2013 #47
My bet is that it will be a dude who opposes abortion, Nye Bevan Mar 2013 #49
I'm guessing it will be demwing Mar 2013 #52

jsr

(7,712 posts)
1. Nobody pays attention to what a pope says anymore
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 12:50 AM
Mar 2013

Last edited Sat Mar 9, 2013, 02:46 AM - Edit history (1)

Regardless, for many years the Vatican has been deferring to scientists on scientific matters. Catholic schools teach evolution - keep in mind Mendel was a monk and Lamarck was a Jesuit.

hlthe2b

(102,120 posts)
35. That really isn't true--that "nobody pays attention to what a pope says"...(though I wish it were)
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:59 AM
Mar 2013

Hekate

(90,556 posts)
2. If you are "long lapsed" why should you care?
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 12:51 AM
Mar 2013

In this country, the Church is losing adherents by the pew-full. Our biggest worry is our home-grown home-schooled fundamentalists, aka Talibornagains.

Relax. If the conclave does what you fear, they will become ever more irrelevant to North America and Europe.

murray hill farm

(3,650 posts)
43. Long lapsed myself....but
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 12:29 PM
Mar 2013

even if I were not, what difference does it make who is pope? Why does anyone care at all. All the hype on this seems silly...and way, way over done. Why does anyone care about this at all?

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
18. Not quite.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:51 AM
Mar 2013

Religions invented the false prophecy, starting with all of the ridiculous predictions in ancient texts that never came true.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
5. I don't think the world ignores a pope, combined with an opus dei Supreme Court
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:03 AM
Mar 2013

Nothing but trouble afoot.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
6. Is Anthony Kennedy opus dei?
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:07 AM
Mar 2013

He recently said he did not like having the USSC decided controversial matters such as gay marriage.

Hekate

(90,556 posts)
19. Scalia, Thomas, Roberts ...
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 02:01 AM
Mar 2013

... allegedly.

Scalia has ties and associations. Scalia brought Thomas in. Roberts seems to have associations, but more is uncertain.

Allegedly.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
34. It's an interesting religious make up on the current court
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:57 AM
Mar 2013

Six of the Supreme Court Justices are Roman Catholic. The other three are Jewish. I'm fairly certain that Sotomayer isn't Opus Dei, but I could easily see Thomas, Scalia and Alito being part of that group. Roberts every now and then tempers a decision with wisdom instead of completely toeing the conservative line. I don't know much about Kennedy.

Hekate

(90,556 posts)
48. I forgot about Alito.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 12:18 AM
Mar 2013

No way is Sotomayor associated with that cult.

Yes, the makeup of the Court is interesting. This is the first time in US history that no one on it is Protestant. It used to be 100% Protestant.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
45. I have heard nothing regarding Roberts having any Opus Dei association.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 02:54 PM
Mar 2013

Scalia and Thomas on the other hand are know for it and are open about it. Subversive.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
7. Just curious... how would you feel if O'Malley were picked?
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:14 AM
Mar 2013

I'm curious because I'm from near Boston. Seems like he's a decent guy, but I'm not very expert on the Catholic Church.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
12. You're almost certainly right. But...
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:22 AM
Mar 2013

these are weird times. I'm only a (very) uneducated observer, but it seems to me that O'Malley has qualities that are unusual in a Cardinal that would be very useful in righting the church. He's dealt forthrightly with the catastrophe that Cardinal Law left behing, and is extremely humble.

But I'm well aware that even if he'd be a sensible choice, reality is often anticorrelated with sensible.

BainsBane

(53,012 posts)
14. The American church has long been a thorn in the side of the Vatican
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:25 AM
Mar 2013

besides there is no upside in appointing a pope from the US. If they are going to go outside of Europe, they are better off with a Latin American. A Quebecois candidate has also been named as a possibility.

Raven

(13,877 posts)
27. O'Malley would be a good choice and for that reason
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:24 AM
Mar 2013

alone, they won't pick him. He is relatively young and has done a pretty good job in Boston given the mess that Law left.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
8. When was the last time
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:15 AM
Mar 2013

the pope's opinion influenced anyone in America, including catholics? He'll have enough trouble keeping most of the nuns in line. Seriously. Or are you personally worried?

BainsBane

(53,012 posts)
10. What makes you think he will be anti-science?
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 01:21 AM
Mar 2013

I believe Vatican II set to put to rest the idea that science and religion were in conflict.

The new pope will be a conservative, since the cardinals have been appointed during the past two papacies are all conservatives.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
39. Sedevacantists aside, they're probably the least backwards of the major religions on science
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 10:22 AM
Mar 2013

John Paul II was interested in genetic engineering for awhile and (cautiously) supportive of the whole endeavour. I'm sure you can find senior people in some of the wackier large Christian branches who are still working on accepting germ theory or heliocentrism.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
21. That would be the smart thing for the cardinals to do
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 02:22 AM
Mar 2013

Or an African. However, money is on another European, probably an Italian. They'll feel the need to shore up their base before they branch out.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
22. OP: unlax. There's not a chance there's a new pope next week. These things take time. Lots of
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 02:32 AM
Mar 2013

time. There's oodles of politicking to be done, plus mountains of ceremonies to wade through.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
50. And not 4 days later...
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:52 PM
Mar 2013

White Smoke.




VATICAN CITY — With a puff of white smoke from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel and to the cheers of thousands of rain-soaked faithful, a gathering of Catholic cardinals picked a new pope from among their midst on Wednesday. The name of the new pope, the 266th pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church, by tradition would not be revealed until he appeared on a balcony on the front of St. Peter’s Basilica.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/world/europe/cardinals-elect-new-pope.html

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
23. There's no risk of anyone anywhere near as bad as the Taliban, but I'm not optimistic.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 06:34 AM
Mar 2013

There's a long, long space between "a decent person" and "as bad as the Taliban".

no_hypocrisy

(46,021 posts)
26. Ignorance asking:
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:11 AM
Mar 2013

Can a Pope be chosen from someone Catholic outside the clergy? Or is it restricted to Cardinals?

 

aristocles

(594 posts)
28. Cardinals only need apply.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:32 AM
Mar 2013

In 1058, the papal bull In Nomine Domini restricted the selection of a pope to cardinals.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
36. That was rescinded about a century later
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 10:13 AM
Mar 2013

One of the popes in the 1500s wasn't even a priest or monk, though he was still in the church hierarchy, and an archbishop was in the running for awhile after Pius XII died.

The rule these days is basically "male Catholic, preferably alive," though obviously the overwhelming chunk of the tradition leans that towards cardinals. Cardinals are the only ones who can vote, but at the moment there isn't really anything codified that prevents them from selecting, say, the priest at the Catholic church down the street from my house (or hell, one of the altar boys).

 

aristocles

(594 posts)
41. Did some more research. You're correct.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 10:24 AM
Mar 2013

Any celibate Catholic male can be selected. If the candidate is not a priest, he is ordained as a bishop before becoming pope.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
31. I'm not a big fan of the Catholic Church so I really don't care and neither should anyone else
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:48 AM
Mar 2013

They have tried to screw with the right to choose, women's health, and health care in general (and so many other issues). The US should stop bending over to appease the Catholic Church (I'm referring to those who have tried to pass laws against those issue which are mostly Republicans). The truth is the church doesn't give a shit about human rights, only making sure woman stay in the 12th century.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
32. It will be a sexist homophobic hypocrite. Which sexist homophobic hypocrite does not really
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:50 AM
Mar 2013

matter does it?

hlthe2b

(102,120 posts)
33. If the pick is limited to the very Cardinals elevated by the past two Popes, it would seem...
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:53 AM
Mar 2013

the dye has been cast to continue in this same very regressive stance. Unless, by chance there has been one who has secreted his true beliefs and intent over the decades---something I'd find unlikely.

Choosing one from the very select (and pardon the apt comparison), "good ole boys" network.... pretty much ensures very little will change. At least there may be a chance for a "generational" change, for whatever that is worth.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
47. I think I know who they're going to pick...
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 09:31 PM
Mar 2013


Make sure you altar boys stretch out those creamy hamstrings!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
49. My bet is that it will be a dude who opposes abortion,
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 12:38 AM
Mar 2013

but weirdly does not understand that the best way to reduce abortion is to make contraception widely available.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
52. I'm guessing it will be
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:58 PM
Mar 2013

someone Catholic? Not sure...

Be cool if they elected the Dalai Lama as Pope.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This time next week there...