General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis time next week there will be a new Pope. And I'm sick with worry.
As a long lapsed catholic, I believe the pick will be the most anti science pope since the dark ages. A total christian Taliban.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 9, 2013, 02:46 AM - Edit history (1)
Regardless, for many years the Vatican has been deferring to scientists on scientific matters. Catholic schools teach evolution - keep in mind Mendel was a monk and Lamarck was a Jesuit.
hlthe2b
(102,120 posts)Hekate
(90,556 posts)In this country, the Church is losing adherents by the pew-full. Our biggest worry is our home-grown home-schooled fundamentalists, aka Talibornagains.
Relax. If the conclave does what you fear, they will become ever more irrelevant to North America and Europe.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)murray hill farm
(3,650 posts)even if I were not, what difference does it make who is pope? Why does anyone care at all. All the hype on this seems silly...and way, way over done. Why does anyone care about this at all?
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)most will ignore.
rabid_byter
(40 posts)Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Religions invented the false prophecy, starting with all of the ridiculous predictions in ancient texts that never came true.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Nothing but trouble afoot.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)He recently said he did not like having the USSC decided controversial matters such as gay marriage.
Hekate
(90,556 posts)... allegedly.
Scalia has ties and associations. Scalia brought Thomas in. Roberts seems to have associations, but more is uncertain.
Allegedly.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Six of the Supreme Court Justices are Roman Catholic. The other three are Jewish. I'm fairly certain that Sotomayer isn't Opus Dei, but I could easily see Thomas, Scalia and Alito being part of that group. Roberts every now and then tempers a decision with wisdom instead of completely toeing the conservative line. I don't know much about Kennedy.
Hekate
(90,556 posts)No way is Sotomayor associated with that cult.
Yes, the makeup of the Court is interesting. This is the first time in US history that no one on it is Protestant. It used to be 100% Protestant.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Scalia and Thomas on the other hand are know for it and are open about it. Subversive.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'm curious because I'm from near Boston. Seems like he's a decent guy, but I'm not very expert on the Catholic Church.
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)that much you can count on.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)these are weird times. I'm only a (very) uneducated observer, but it seems to me that O'Malley has qualities that are unusual in a Cardinal that would be very useful in righting the church. He's dealt forthrightly with the catastrophe that Cardinal Law left behing, and is extremely humble.
But I'm well aware that even if he'd be a sensible choice, reality is often anticorrelated with sensible.
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)besides there is no upside in appointing a pope from the US. If they are going to go outside of Europe, they are better off with a Latin American. A Quebecois candidate has also been named as a possibility.
Raven
(13,877 posts)alone, they won't pick him. He is relatively young and has done a pretty good job in Boston given the mess that Law left.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)BainsBane
(53,012 posts)a thorn in their side.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Because we don't take orders from Vatican City
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)the pope's opinion influenced anyone in America, including catholics? He'll have enough trouble keeping most of the nuns in line. Seriously. Or are you personally worried?
CK_John
(10,005 posts)BainsBane
(53,012 posts)I believe Vatican II set to put to rest the idea that science and religion were in conflict.
The new pope will be a conservative, since the cardinals have been appointed during the past two papacies are all conservatives.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)John Paul II was interested in genetic engineering for awhile and (cautiously) supportive of the whole endeavour. I'm sure you can find senior people in some of the wackier large Christian branches who are still working on accepting germ theory or heliocentrism.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)be an Italian.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Or an African. However, money is on another European, probably an Italian. They'll feel the need to shore up their base before they branch out.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)GiveMeFreedom
(976 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)time. There's oodles of politicking to be done, plus mountains of ceremonies to wade through.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)White Smoke.
VATICAN CITY With a puff of white smoke from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel and to the cheers of thousands of rain-soaked faithful, a gathering of Catholic cardinals picked a new pope from among their midst on Wednesday. The name of the new pope, the 266th pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church, by tradition would not be revealed until he appeared on a balcony on the front of St. Peters Basilica.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/world/europe/cardinals-elect-new-pope.html
Good luck to Pope Franciscus.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)There's a long, long space between "a decent person" and "as bad as the Taliban".
sibelian
(7,804 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,021 posts)Can a Pope be chosen from someone Catholic outside the clergy? Or is it restricted to Cardinals?
aristocles
(594 posts)In 1058, the papal bull In Nomine Domini restricted the selection of a pope to cardinals.
no_hypocrisy
(46,021 posts)although it couldn't hurt.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/faq.aspx
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)One of the popes in the 1500s wasn't even a priest or monk, though he was still in the church hierarchy, and an archbishop was in the running for awhile after Pius XII died.
The rule these days is basically "male Catholic, preferably alive," though obviously the overwhelming chunk of the tradition leans that towards cardinals. Cardinals are the only ones who can vote, but at the moment there isn't really anything codified that prevents them from selecting, say, the priest at the Catholic church down the street from my house (or hell, one of the altar boys).
aristocles
(594 posts)Any celibate Catholic male can be selected. If the candidate is not a priest, he is ordained as a bishop before becoming pope.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)They have tried to screw with the right to choose, women's health, and health care in general (and so many other issues). The US should stop bending over to appease the Catholic Church (I'm referring to those who have tried to pass laws against those issue which are mostly Republicans). The truth is the church doesn't give a shit about human rights, only making sure woman stay in the 12th century.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)matter does it?
hlthe2b
(102,120 posts)the dye has been cast to continue in this same very regressive stance. Unless, by chance there has been one who has secreted his true beliefs and intent over the decades---something I'd find unlikely.
Choosing one from the very select (and pardon the apt comparison), "good ole boys" network.... pretty much ensures very little will change. At least there may be a chance for a "generational" change, for whatever that is worth.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)And not a moment too soon.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Make sure you altar boys stretch out those creamy hamstrings!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)but weirdly does not understand that the best way to reduce abortion is to make contraception widely available.
demwing
(16,916 posts)someone Catholic? Not sure...
Be cool if they elected the Dalai Lama as Pope.