Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 06:10 PM Mar 2013

Repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Law

Three days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Congress approved the Authorization for Use of Military Force. It was enacted with good intentions - to give President George W. Bush the authority to invade Afghanistan and go after Al Qaeda and the Taliban rulers who sheltered and aided the terrorists who had attacked the United States.

But over time, that resolution became warped into something else: the basis for a vast overreaching of power by one president, Mr. Bush, and less outrageous but still dangerous policies by another, Barack Obama.

Mr. Bush used the authorization law as an excuse to kidnap hundreds of people - guilty and blameless people alike - and throw them into secret prisons where many were tortured. He used it as a pretext to open the Guantánamo Bay camp and to eavesdrop on Americans without bothering to obtain a warrant. He claimed it as justification for the invasion of Iraq, twisting intelligence to fabricate a connection between Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 attacks. Unlike Mr. Bush, Mr. Obama does not go as far as to claim that the Constitution gives him the inherent power to do all those things. But he has relied on the 2001 authorization to use drones to kill terrorists far from the Afghan battlefield, and to claim an unconstitutional power to kill American citizens in other countries based only on suspicion that they are or might become terrorist threats, without judicial review.

The concern that many, including this page, expressed about the authorization is coming true: that it could become the basis for a perpetual, ever-expanding war that undermined the traditional constraints on government power. The result is an unintelligible policy without express limits or protective walls.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/opinion/sunday/repeal-the-authorization-for-use-of-military-force-law.xml

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Law (Original Post) JRLeft Mar 2013 OP
The NY Times gets one right. (nt) limpyhobbler Mar 2013 #1
Works for me. Repeal it. n/t Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #2
Dont think we can go back home. This is the dream of the military-industrial-media complex. nm rhett o rick Mar 2013 #3
The AUMF was the ultimate CYA act. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2013 #4
^ Wilms Mar 2013 #5
 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
4. The AUMF was the ultimate CYA act.
Sun Mar 10, 2013, 07:04 PM
Mar 2013

Congress surrendered it's authority to declare war to the Executive. And, we got a series of unnecessary and lost wars as a result.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Repeal the Authorization ...