General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs rape trial opens, prosecutor says girl was ‘too impaired to say no’
By Erin McClam, Staff Writer, NBC News
In a brief opening statement, Brian Duncan, the lawyer representing Mays, said simply: Trent Mays did not rape the young lady in question. The lawyer for Richmond declined to make an opening statement.
The girl, who told police she didnt remember the incident, will be among dozens of witnesses taking the stand. Three players who have not been charged but allegedly witnessed the encounters are expected to testify for the prosecution.
The prosecutions evidence also includes a photograph posted on Instagram of Mays, 17, and Richmond, 16, carrying the teen out of a house by her arms and legs.
Defense motions have suggested that witnesses would be asked about the alleged victims alcohol consumption and what she said right after the incident and the next morning.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/13/17286184-as-rape-trial-opens-prosecutor-says-girl-was-too-impaired-to-say-no?lite
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)That is the only reason I can think that the prosecutor would say this. There is no way the defense can say that being to intoxicated gives consent. With the photos that cannot be a part of the defenses strategy.
Melinda
(5,465 posts)In her opening statement at a trial that has divided the football-obsessed town of Steubenville, prosecutor Marianne Hemmeter also said that the girl was soft-spoken, mumbling and not participating in the assault.
Helpful to me anyway. Relates to the headline better.
The Prosecutor has framed this correctly. Thanks for posting.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Are we to assume that in the absence of a clearly articulated "no," sex with impaired women is sanctioned by some sort of universal prior consent? That is ridiculous.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Trent Mays did not rape the young lady in question.
Is he saying that Mays did not have sex with the girl?
or
Is he saying that Mays did have sex with the girl, but it somehow wasn't rape?
I haven't followed the case that closely, so I don't know how much evidence there is that Mays actually committed the act. Saying "I didn't touch her" is a stronger defense than "We did it, but she drunkenly consented."
ck4829
(35,057 posts)Then it's rape. Open and shut.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)So, the trial should be over soon.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)What is this "admits" stuff?
The prosecutor thinks it was rape; that's why she's prosecuting the case.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I read a story earlier where the lawyer for the defense was making the same argument. That the victim didn't say no because she was too impaired.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)but somehow ensure that the attacker (friend, husband, boyfriend, date, etc.) doesn't get 'confused' and think that by 'no', she really means 'yes'.
The fact that she was unable to say 'no' should aid in her case, but as we have seen from other cases, that's not always a guarantee either.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)But, no one believed it was enough, there were no bruises.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Was it the prosecutor or defense attorney who said that?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)There has to be a reason he said it. At some point, did the defense say she didn't say no?
The subject line is the headline. Still not sure what part the other poster wants changed.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The two Ohio high school football stars accused of raping a drunken 16-year-old girl humiliated somebody who was too impaired to say no, somebody who was too impaired to say stop, a prosecutor said Wednesday.
That is from the article.
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)"If convicted, Mays and Richmond could be held in a juvenile jail until they are 21."
I understand we treat minors different from adults, but holy hell they are almost 18!
Here is another article that says the same thing. LINK
Quote from above article...."Both will be tried as juveniles, which means even if they receive the maximum punishment, they will be free at age 21. "
WTF???
redqueen
(115,103 posts)used the 'do you really want to ruin these young men's lives?' song and dance, in order to ensure they get the lightest slap on the wrist possible.
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)...But I still cant believe that the MAXIMUM punishment for an entire night of sexual assault will be three years. In juvie. Imagine that they might not get the maximum! I fear that this thread is going to be buried because of all the pope stuff.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Weak D.
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)...and its getting lost in the pope stuff.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)WOMEN DO NOT EXIST IN A PERPETUAL STATE OF "YES".
The default isn't "YES" unless there is a "NO".
The default is "NO" unless there is a "YES".
Jackasses.