Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 01:45 PM Mar 2013

As rape trial opens, prosecutor says girl was ‘too impaired to say no’

By Erin McClam, Staff Writer, NBC News

In a brief opening statement, Brian Duncan, the lawyer representing Mays, said simply: “Trent Mays did not rape the young lady in question.” The lawyer for Richmond declined to make an opening statement.

The girl, who told police she didn’t remember the incident, will be among dozens of witnesses taking the stand. Three players who have not been charged but allegedly witnessed the encounters are expected to testify for the prosecution.

The prosecution’s evidence also includes a photograph posted on Instagram of Mays, 17, and Richmond, 16, carrying the teen out of a house by her arms and legs.

Defense motions have suggested that witnesses would be asked about the alleged victim’s alcohol consumption and what she said right after the incident and the next morning.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/13/17286184-as-rape-trial-opens-prosecutor-says-girl-was-too-impaired-to-say-no?lite

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As rape trial opens, prosecutor says girl was ‘too impaired to say no’ (Original Post) NCTraveler Mar 2013 OP
Is the kid really saying she didn't say no, therefore it was fair game. NCTraveler Mar 2013 #1
It would be helpful if you had c/p the opening (relevant) paragraphs... Melinda Mar 2013 #2
if she's too impaired to say "no," then she's too impaired to give consent.... mike_c Mar 2013 #3
Mays' attorney's statement is ambiguous. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #4
If she is not able to say "yes" or "no" or if she has to be walked because she is intoxicated ck4829 Mar 2013 #5
So the prosecutor admits it was rape... Kalidurga Mar 2013 #6
???? Of course the prosecutor thinks it was rape. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #7
Sorry very tired... Kalidurga Mar 2013 #22
Many people believe that a woman must not only say no, redqueen Mar 2013 #8
Yep, I have known women who said no... Kalidurga Mar 2013 #23
So she was "too impaired to say yes". Case closed. Guilty. (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2013 #9
Please edit...it's not the prosecutor, but the defense attorney claiming this...nt joeybee12 Mar 2013 #10
Please point to the section of the article you would like edited. nt. NCTraveler Mar 2013 #13
I think it's the subject line gollygee Mar 2013 #14
The prosecutor. Hence the point of my first post. NCTraveler Mar 2013 #17
Subject line says prosecutor, then the article notes its the lawyer for the defendant...nt joeybee12 Mar 2013 #16
It would make more sense. That is one of the things I was questioning. NCTraveler Mar 2013 #18
This is the maximum punishment they could face? actslikeacarrot Mar 2013 #11
I'd be surprised if someone on the defense team or the police force hasn't already redqueen Mar 2013 #12
Your probably right... actslikeacarrot Mar 2013 #15
Gee...was she also 'too impared to say yes'? Rex Mar 2013 #19
kick for an important story... actslikeacarrot Mar 2013 #20
Note to the idiots prosecuting this case: MadrasT Mar 2013 #21
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
1. Is the kid really saying she didn't say no, therefore it was fair game.
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 01:49 PM
Mar 2013

That is the only reason I can think that the prosecutor would say this. There is no way the defense can say that being to intoxicated gives consent. With the photos that cannot be a part of the defenses strategy.

Melinda

(5,465 posts)
2. It would be helpful if you had c/p the opening (relevant) paragraphs...
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 01:50 PM
Mar 2013
The two Ohio high school football stars accused of raping a drunken 16-year-old girl humiliated “somebody who was too impaired to say no, somebody who was too impaired to say stop,” a prosecutor said Wednesday.

In her opening statement at a trial that has divided the football-obsessed town of Steubenville, prosecutor Marianne Hemmeter also said that the girl was “soft-spoken, mumbling and not participating” in the assault.


Helpful to me anyway. Relates to the headline better.

The Prosecutor has framed this correctly. Thanks for posting.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
3. if she's too impaired to say "no," then she's too impaired to give consent....
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 01:53 PM
Mar 2013

Are we to assume that in the absence of a clearly articulated "no," sex with impaired women is sanctioned by some sort of universal prior consent? That is ridiculous.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
4. Mays' attorney's statement is ambiguous.
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:12 PM
Mar 2013

“Trent Mays did not rape the young lady in question.”

Is he saying that Mays did not have sex with the girl?

or

Is he saying that Mays did have sex with the girl, but it somehow wasn't rape?

I haven't followed the case that closely, so I don't know how much evidence there is that Mays actually committed the act. Saying "I didn't touch her" is a stronger defense than "We did it, but she drunkenly consented."

ck4829

(35,057 posts)
5. If she is not able to say "yes" or "no" or if she has to be walked because she is intoxicated
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:16 PM
Mar 2013

Then it's rape. Open and shut.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
7. ???? Of course the prosecutor thinks it was rape.
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:25 PM
Mar 2013

What is this "admits" stuff?

The prosecutor thinks it was rape; that's why she's prosecuting the case.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
22. Sorry very tired...
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 06:59 PM
Mar 2013

I read a story earlier where the lawyer for the defense was making the same argument. That the victim didn't say no because she was too impaired.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
8. Many people believe that a woman must not only say no,
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:29 PM
Mar 2013

but somehow ensure that the attacker (friend, husband, boyfriend, date, etc.) doesn't get 'confused' and think that by 'no', she really means 'yes'.

The fact that she was unable to say 'no' should aid in her case, but as we have seen from other cases, that's not always a guarantee either.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
17. The prosecutor. Hence the point of my first post.
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:59 PM
Mar 2013

There has to be a reason he said it. At some point, did the defense say she didn't say no?

The subject line is the headline. Still not sure what part the other poster wants changed.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
18. It would make more sense. That is one of the things I was questioning.
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 03:03 PM
Mar 2013

The two Ohio high school football stars accused of raping a drunken 16-year-old girl humiliated “somebody who was too impaired to say no, somebody who was too impaired to say stop,” a prosecutor said Wednesday.

That is from the article.

actslikeacarrot

(464 posts)
11. This is the maximum punishment they could face?
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:35 PM
Mar 2013

"If convicted, Mays and Richmond could be held in a juvenile jail until they are 21."

I understand we treat minors different from adults, but holy hell they are almost 18!

Here is another article that says the same thing. LINK

Quote from above article...."Both will be tried as juveniles, which means even if they receive the maximum punishment, they will be free at age 21. "

WTF???

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
12. I'd be surprised if someone on the defense team or the police force hasn't already
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:42 PM
Mar 2013

used the 'do you really want to ruin these young men's lives?' song and dance, in order to ensure they get the lightest slap on the wrist possible.

actslikeacarrot

(464 posts)
15. Your probably right...
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:58 PM
Mar 2013

...But I still cant believe that the MAXIMUM punishment for an entire night of sexual assault will be three years. In juvie. Imagine that they might not get the maximum! I fear that this thread is going to be buried because of all the pope stuff.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
21. Note to the idiots prosecuting this case:
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 05:02 PM
Mar 2013

WOMEN DO NOT EXIST IN A PERPETUAL STATE OF "YES".

The default isn't "YES" unless there is a "NO".

The default is "NO" unless there is a "YES".

Jackasses.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As rape trial opens, pros...