General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Killing Jews Is Worship’ Ad Campaign Rolled Out On SF Muni Buses
SAN FRANCISCO (KPIX 5) A controversy has been re-ignited this week as ten new ads go up on San Francisco Muni buses containing quotes used by terrorists.
Killing Jews is worship that draws us closer to Allah, reads one of the ads, which has people debating the line between free speech and hate speech.
The purpose of our campaign is to show the reality of Jihad, the root causes of terrorism. Using the exact quotes and text that they use, said Pamela Geller of the American Freedom Defense Institute.
(snip)
Geller said the ads were a response to another bus ad campaign earlier this year by the Council on American-Islamic Relations. That campaign sought to disassociate the word jihad with violence and reclaim its meaning as the struggle, which is a central tenet of Islam.
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/03/11/killing-jews-is-worship-ad-campaign-rolled-out-on-sf-buses/
=====
What am I missing? I don't get it
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)It's Pamela Geller.
question everything
(47,470 posts)A trouble maker with too much money to cause trouble?
And why would the buses even accept these ads?
dsc
(52,155 posts)It becomes a first amendment issue.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)dsc
(52,155 posts)if you run ads at all, then you can't pick and choose which ads you will and won't run as a public entity.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)These kinds of suits are common, and most often won by the plaintiffs.
http://westhollywood.patch.com/articles/aids-walk-organizer-sues-santa-monica-over-bus-ads
AIDS Walk Organizer Sues City Over Bus Ads
Two fellow Santa Monica residents join suit, which alleges the Big Blue Bus advertising policy violates free speech rights.
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/news/transportation/port-authority-loses-lawsuit-over-nonprofit-bus-ads-351721/
Port Authority loses lawsuit over nonprofit bus ads
A federal judge ruled yesterday that the Port Authority unlawfully discriminated against a nonprofit group by refusing to accept its advertisements designed to inform the public that ex-felons in Pennsylvania have the right to vote.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/10/arkansas-atheist-bus-ads_n_874849.html
Arkansas Atheists Sue Over Controversial Bus Ads
(Reuters) - A coalition of atheists is accusing Little Rock's city bus line of violating their rights to free speech in a fight to place ads on public buses praising a God-free lifestyle.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/04/lawsuit-forces-chicago-to-accept-anti-jihad-bus-ads/
Lawsuit forces Chicago to accept anti-jihad bus ads
The Chicago Transit Authority has agreed to display plain-spoken anti-jihad ads on city buses, following a lawsuit by the American Freedom Law Center.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Looking at the thread here, dsc said "It is very hard for public entities to refuse ads. It becomes a first amendment issue."
To which you replied "Actually it's not."
And then, in response to being confronted with a set of first amendment lawsuits against public entities for refusing ads, you say "all those suits occurred because the ads were REFUSED."
Well, no shit. That was dsc's point.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)not everyone who is refused, sues.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)That's a demonstrated fact.
It's the entire reason why they do this.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,500 posts)Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)I do believe she would hang every Muslim from the nearest tree, given the opportunity.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Geller says that it's okay to depict Mohamed with the head of a pig saying "I don't know where it is in America that you can't make jokes or make fun...", but I can bet she would be screaming if somebody depicted her in an anti-Semitic way.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)The woman is looney. A Muslim must have killed her dog.
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)made today that take the words and actions of a few and apply them to every member of the group.
Just because 'jihad' is a tenet of Islam, not all who follow Islam are terrorists. It has been explained to me by Muslims that terrorist "jihad" is equivalent to heresy, perverting the true meaning of the term in Islamic teachings.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)....actively preyed on young boys while the Catholic organization itself tried to keep it all a secret?
Actions of a few? I guess that depends on your definition of the word "few"?
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)of TOS
How many Democrats owned slaves, opposed rights for women and blacks, are active in Washington, the military and intelligence agencies in extrajudicial drone strikes in nations we are not in conflict with, supporting and maintaining Guantanamo, violating protected rights under the aegis of the Patriot act...
Or do you believe all Muslims are terrorists, all Catholics are criminal enablers, all...
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)in fact, they're supported financially by countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran which have Islam as their state religions
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)I hate religion. Yet I can recognize that the vast, vast majority of Muslims do not support terrorism.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)and do they condemn countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran for their funding of terrorist groups
have they condemned the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt for their past comments and actions
did they ever condemn the Taliban in Afghanistan
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)But they are ignored by people like you, who don't listen.
http://www.ciogc.org/go.aspx?link=7655053
American Muslim groups have repeatedly issued statements condemning terrorism in all forms wherever it has risen, not because they are asked to, but because of the basic Islamic principle that no one has the right to take innocent life. They have done so from the beginning of the spate of attacks in the name of Islam, since the events of September 11, 2001 when a coalition of leading Muslim groups condemned the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Continuing to do so, they work with law enforcement agencies on all levels to curb extremism. American Muslims say that terrorists pervert their religion and that they are just as concerned as anyone about the future and safety of our families.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15044797
Muslim peace conference condemns terrorism
Thousands of Muslims have attended a peace conference in London which has condemned terrorism.
About 12,000 Muslims gathered at Wembley Arena for Islamic group Minhaj-ul-Quran's Peace for Humanity Conference.
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)the condemnation of terrorism is rather weak.
I have spent time in SA and met the 'man on the street'. John Doe of SA believe terrorists may be trying to help but only make 'John' look bad. He would rather the money that goes to support terrorist be invested in programs which would help 'John'. Not everyone in SA is a Sheikh.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Posters here say anyone who supports gun rights is a LaPierre support and use his words to tar all of us. Many applaud. One even claims that all gun owners have blood on their hands and there is no blowback. Yet when Geller does it to Muslims and all of a sudden its unacceptable behavior.
Just saying...
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)I carry a lot of LaPierre tar for having a stance supported by the minority
There are unwritten rules about what hate is tolerated and what hate is forbidden. I am in the mood of tilting at windmills today
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Response to Gravitycollapse (Reply #10)
ProgressiveProfessor This message was self-deleted by its author.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Which is to portray Islam as the religion of terrorists.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)It's a quote taken from a music video made by Hamas' al-Qassam Brigade (...Who knew?) which states that "killing the occupiers is worship that draws us closer to Allah." The word Jew (yahood) is actually not used. Still not pleasant, but not exactly what it's claimed to be.
And even if it were, putting the words of Hamas into the mouths of every Muslim is indefensible.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)other than Israelis
Hasn't Hamas vowed to drive Israel into the sea or was the Hezbollah
either way, Hamas is attacking Jews and other Israelis
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)That is to say, they probably don't give a damn about your uncle Hershel in Orlando one way or another.
At any rate, Gellar is using an inaccurate quote to blanket all Muslims.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)However, until then I'm just going to make a big, big, unsupported assumption, that you understand and agree that using a false quote from hamas to characterize all Muslims, is not acceptable.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Or not.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)mission accomplished.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)My Jihad's Facebook page calls for "taking back Jihad, one hashtag at a time, from anti-Muslim and Muslim extremists". From the website:
The ads range from religious interpretations to personal battles, reflecting the wide range of meanings of "jihad", which literally means "struggle".
http://stream.aljazeera.com/story/fighting-islamophobia-myjihad-0022440
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)She gets to flaunt her inflammatory Islamophobia.
She gets to accuse people who want to get rid of the ads of censorship.
And she gets to get people arguing about whether all Muslims are terrorists or not.
She's like guns: I wish we could just wish her away.
question everything
(47,470 posts)to get attention like... Joe McCarthy, Ann Coulter, and all the other nuts who know they will get face time on cable TV by saying the craziest things.
Sigh..
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,174 posts)But whatelse would you expect from Pam Geller?