Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge sums up essence of Bradley Manning case in one sentence:
"The guarding of military and diplomatic secrets at the expense of informed representative government provides no real security for our Republic."
Death to Whistle-Blowers?
By FLOYD ABRAMS and YOCHAI BENKLER
"LAST month Pfc. Bradley Manning pleaded guilty to several offenses related to leaking hundreds of thousands of documents to WikiLeaks in 2010, a plea that could land him in jail for 20 years. But Private Manning still faces trial on the most serious charges, including the potential capital offense of aiding the enemy though the prosecution is not seeking the death penalty in this case, only a life sentence.
If successful, the prosecution will establish a chilling precedent: national security leaks may subject the leakers to a capital prosecution or at least life imprisonment. Anyone who holds freedom of the press dear should shudder at the threat that the prosecutions theory presents to journalists, their sources and the public that relies on them.
You dont have to think that WikiLeaks is the future of media, or Private Manning a paragon of heroic whistle-blowing, to understand the threat. Indeed, the two of us deeply disagree with each other about how to assess Private Mannings conduct and WikiLeakss behavior."
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/opinion/the-impact-of-the-bradley-manning-case.html?ref=opinion
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1220 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge sums up essence of Bradley Manning case in one sentence: (Original Post)
wtmusic
Mar 2013
OP
PDittie
(8,322 posts)1. For the record, that was Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black
and not Bradley Manning's judge. And Black was referring to the Pentagon Papers case in 1971. But I still agree with your (and his) point.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)3. I will go much farther.
When our politicians start using secrecy to cover up War Crimes
or War Profiteering, or for Political Purposes,
or to hide incompetence or embarrassment,
no only does it provide no real security for our Republic,
[font size=3]it makes "informed consent" IMPOSSIBLE,[/font]
and greatly DAMAGES our democracy.
In THIS scenario, whistleblowers like Manning and Assange become Guardians of our Democracy, and National Heroes.
Bradley Manning, THIS American Citizen salutes you,
your courage,
and your Patriotism!
Bandit
(21,475 posts)4. But if you are Republican and out a Covert CIA Agent you get applause and a thumbs up.
No wonder Democrats are afraid of their shadows. They know they will get the shaft and Republicans will get the Gold for the very same thing..