Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:47 AM Mar 2013

Judge sums up essence of Bradley Manning case in one sentence:

"The guarding of military and diplomatic secrets at the expense of informed representative government provides no real security for our Republic."



Death to Whistle-Blowers?
By FLOYD ABRAMS and YOCHAI BENKLER

"LAST month Pfc. Bradley Manning pleaded guilty to several offenses related to leaking hundreds of thousands of documents to WikiLeaks in 2010, a plea that could land him in jail for 20 years. But Private Manning still faces trial on the most serious charges, including the potential capital offense of “aiding the enemy” — though the prosecution is not seeking the death penalty in this case, “only” a life sentence.

If successful, the prosecution will establish a chilling precedent: national security leaks may subject the leakers to a capital prosecution or at least life imprisonment. Anyone who holds freedom of the press dear should shudder at the threat that the prosecution’s theory presents to journalists, their sources and the public that relies on them.

You don’t have to think that WikiLeaks is the future of media, or Private Manning a paragon of heroic whistle-blowing, to understand the threat. Indeed, the two of us deeply disagree with each other about how to assess Private Manning’s conduct and WikiLeaks’s behavior."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/opinion/the-impact-of-the-bradley-manning-case.html?ref=opinion
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge sums up essence of Bradley Manning case in one sentence: (Original Post) wtmusic Mar 2013 OP
For the record, that was Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black PDittie Mar 2013 #1
Thanks nt wtmusic Mar 2013 #2
I will go much farther. bvar22 Mar 2013 #3
But if you are Republican and out a Covert CIA Agent you get applause and a thumbs up. Bandit Mar 2013 #4

PDittie

(8,322 posts)
1. For the record, that was Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 02:02 PM
Mar 2013

and not Bradley Manning's judge. And Black was referring to the Pentagon Papers case in 1971. But I still agree with your (and his) point.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
3. I will go much farther.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 05:26 PM
Mar 2013

When our politicians start using secrecy to cover up War Crimes
or War Profiteering, or for Political Purposes,
or to hide incompetence or embarrassment,
no only does it provide no real security for our Republic,
[font size=3]it makes "informed consent" IMPOSSIBLE,[/font]
and greatly DAMAGES our democracy.

In THIS scenario, whistleblowers like Manning and Assange become Guardians of our Democracy, and National Heroes.

Bradley Manning, THIS American Citizen salutes you,
your courage,
and your Patriotism!



Bandit

(21,475 posts)
4. But if you are Republican and out a Covert CIA Agent you get applause and a thumbs up.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 06:10 PM
Mar 2013
No wonder Democrats are afraid of their shadows. They know they will get the shaft and Republicans will get the Gold for the very same thing..
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge sums up essence of ...