General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPhoenix may not survive climate change
The Arizona city is almost entirely air-conditioned, and if our power grids fail, its people will fry
BY WILL DEBUYS
If cities were stocks, youd want to short Phoenix.
Of course, its an easy city to pick on. The nations 13th largest metropolitan area (nudging out Detroit) crams 4.3 million people into a low bowl in a hot desert, where horrific heat waves and windstorms visit it regularly. It snuggles next to the nations largest nuclear plant and, having exhausted local sources, it depends on an improbable infrastructure to suck water from the distant (and dwindling) Colorado River.
In Phoenix, you dont ask: What could go wrong? You ask: What couldnt?
And thats the point, really. Phoenixs multiple vulnerabilities, which are plenty daunting taken one by one, have the capacity to magnify one another, like compounding illnesses. In this regard, its a quintessentially modern city, a pyramid of complexities requiring large energy inputs to keep the whole apparatus humming. The urban disasters of our time New Orleans hit by Katrina, New York City swamped by Sandy may arise from single storms, but the damage they do is the result of a chain reaction of failures grids going down, levees failing, back-up systems not backing up. As you might expect, academics have come up with a name for such breakdowns: infrastructure failure interdependencies. You wouldnt want to use it in a poem, but it does catch an emerging theme of our time.
-snip-
http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/tk_5_partner_5/
randome
(34,845 posts)Nice way to capture the complexity of this. The complexity is why too few people can see what's happening in front of their eyes.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Another desert city, completely dependent on electrical power and imported water.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)They pretty much have used up that source, which wasn't supposed to be used up to begin with.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)Get rid of the asinine water-intensive agriculture that has no business being done in Arizona and cities like Phoenix have more slack than most cities in the Southwest.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)sorry, but millions of people living in cities in the middle of deserts are a problem.
Especially when some significant percentage of those millions of people want lawns and golf courses.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)But relative to other urbanized desert areas, Phoenix has more slack than most.
Response to Sen. Walter Sobchak (Reply #12)
Horse with no Name This message was self-deleted by its author.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)and Lake Mead is projected to run dry, potentially, by 2021.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/topics/water/
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)and is draining that also...
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)(see for instance the depletion of the Oglalla Aquifer).
EDIT: And also a problem in Vegas, per USGS: In 1999, Las Vegas, Nevada, was the fastest growing municipal area in the United States. In places, ground-water levels have declined 300 feet since the first flowing artesian well was drilled in 1907. These water-level declines have resulted in as much as 6 feet of subsidence since 1935, as well as having caused springs to dry up and artesian wells to stop flowing (Pavelko and others, 1999).
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)But still, it is probably beyond the carrying capacity of the region. OTOH, so is LA and it is four times the size of Phoenix and more than ten times the size of Las Vegas.
Warpy
(111,245 posts)without air conditioning. The lawn grass and swimming pools will have to go, too.
Phoenix will probably last, but it's going to be one hell of a lot smaller as people who can't stand the heat decamp for higher altitudes or other places completely.
politicat
(9,808 posts)My family moved there when I was 8, in 1984. My father, who was never content to pinch a penny when he could make it writhe in agony, refused to pay for AC, and my mother appears to have the genetic lineage of cat and lizard, and also has Reynaud's syndrome, so she is happiest when temps are never below 85F. My sisters, too like the heat. For some reason, I got all of the far Northern European genes reinforced. (I have minimal melanin, I can roll in snowbanks in my birthday suit, but I can overheat in 50 degree weather, red-haired, light eyes.) The Valley, in 84, was hell to me, but it was manageable.
But in 84, there was less sprawl, less pavement, fewer buildings, more low, flat roofs painted white. Buildings tended to be either masonry block or actual adobe, and were built on the thick wall, small window principle. Several houses in our neighborhood were recessed into the ground a few feet which also helped them stay cool. There were fewer swimming pools and water features, fewer golf courses. Back then, when they said, "but it's a dry heat", it was true. A humid day was 20%. Surface temps got up to 110 during the day, but at night, the desert cooled off, and given appropriate venting and construction methods, houses stayed cool until mid afternoon. When it rained -- which it did, sometimes -- the air cleared and cooled.
Now, average humidity runs about 30-50%, and surface temps can hit 140. All of the pavement soaks up the day-time heat and radiates it back at night. Night temps used to drop into the high 70s or lower; now, high 80s are the best one can hope for. Now, when it rains, the rain is hot -- bathwater warm. And the current construction methods -- 2x4 studding, peaked roofs, ginormous windows -- make it worse.
Response to Warpy (Reply #3)
Horse with no Name This message was self-deleted by its author.
Warpy
(111,245 posts)late afternoon. Otherwise, I get by using fans. Hot, dry air isn't bad as long as it's moving.
Washington DC when I was a kid was bad, temperatures that could go over 100 with 90% humidity. Still, the only guy in the area with AC was one who bought half a dozen commercial units after a big warehouse fire, cleaned them up, and managed to get two of them working.
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)You stayed in the shade on the really hot days and stayed hydrated............worst case scenario (Hoover Dam collapsing), it would be like Egypt or Saudi Arabia.........
By the way, that "largest nuclear power plant" is almost entirely used to power California..........
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)What could go wrong?
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)Any nuclear power plant is a danger.........how about those ones in California quake country.........
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)and where do they get the water to cool the one near Phoenix? Nobody could predict there would ever be a water shortage in that area...
P.S thanks for the info
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 14, 2013, 06:06 PM - Edit history (1)
look at the 30 year averages and how they've increased:
PHOENIX AP (30 year average temperatures (normals))
-----------JAN JUL
1981-2010 45.6 67.4 / 83.3 106.2
1971-2000 43.8 66.8 / 82.2 105.9
1961-1990 41.1 66 / 81 105.8
1951-1980 39.3 65.2 / 79.5 105.0
1941-1970 38 64.7 / 77.6 104.7
1931-1960 38.7 65.5 / 76.6 105
fixed 1951-80 data
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)But I'll take a blackout for 5 days in 110 degrees over a blackout for 5 days in -20 any day of the week..........The AC in my house crashed for 4 days in 113 degree heat and I had no problems........just opened all the doors and windows lived hot for a few
The real problem with Arizona (as well as California, Nevada, Utah, Denver, New Mexico, Texas) is the water infrastructure. Believe it or not, there is not an exhaustion of the groundwater here.......but it will happen if the population keeps increasing like it has been for the last few decades.........
politicat
(9,808 posts)I'll take the cold. When we lost power in Yuma, we lost the water, too, because the water tower didn't have sufficient generating capacity to keep the pressure. With water, it's possible to handle the heat; without water, it almost wasn't.
Yes, losing the power sucked when it was 4 degrees (or whatever it was) but the water and the gas survived.
You can always add clothing, put a canopy over the bed, snuggle, put on a hat. When you're wrapped in a wet sheet, in the shade, drinking two or three gallons a day and still hot...
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)you realize that water requires the same energy that powers your a/c and your lights.
if you have a power outage for 5 days, you or at least some people will not have water for that time period either.
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)Don't let it fool you that if you don't live in a desert, you wouldn't have the same problem........When the power goes, your water goes........unless you have a bucket well on your property........or, like me, you harvest rainwater
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)which is normal where I live.
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)You just need the right storage container so you don't lose the water to evaporation.........
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)How many gallons would that be? 6 months with NO rain, 2 months with very little.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Los Angeles is also, to a great extent, desert. The ocean cools us a little compared to Phoenix, but we are in a desert.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)If the environmentalists ever win in terms of the Delta and the Owens Valley, LA will be a dust bowl
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Tabasco_Dave
(1,259 posts)and people will have to give up their green lawns. Unfortunately LA is the entertainment capital of the world so people will keep moving in. I moved out 18 years ago because of the population boom.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I don't hear much about people trying to get desalinization going. We are going to need it, and as the icebergs melt, it seems to me logical that we will have lots of salt water.
Response to thelordofhell (Reply #15)
Horse with no Name This message was self-deleted by its author.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)Down significantly from then. Another problem with the temperature readings is that they moved the official temperature sensor to Sky Harbor Airport which is nothing but a mass of heat absorbing concrete.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)The Phoenix trend is clear and the trend has been consistently warmer over several decades now.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)but I have loved ones that are still there
FSogol
(45,476 posts)hunter
(38,310 posts)... as it seems likely they will be the immigrants someday.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)but last time I was there they were still watering the sidewalks. Seemed very "old ways" there. Probably has entrenched Rethuglicon leaders.
Lionessa
(3,894 posts)to find where to settle, I noticed the same thing. Sunshine galore and nary a solar panel in sight. Boggles the mind.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)Or perhaps in larger grids?
It's certainly somewhere, since the state ranks second in the nation for solar.
http://www.kpho.com/story/21644129/report-az-ranks-2nd-nationally-in-solar-power-installation
Blanks
(4,835 posts)I had read somewhere that they were installing a huge grid in Arizona a few years ago.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solana_Generating_Station
librechik
(30,674 posts)No I guess not, it's better for the oil cartels to let people fry.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)" If these systems were distributed to the
50 states, the land required from each
state would be an area of about 17 by 17 miles.
This area is available now from parking lots,
rooftops, and vacant land.
In fact, 90% of Americas current electricity needs
could be supplied with solar electric systems built on
the estimated 5 million acres of abandoned
industrial sites in our nations cities."
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)how, exactly?
And it's not oil so much as coal that's a problem as a CO2 generator; electricity generation accounts for more carbon dioxide than transport. And the USA, while a notable emitter of greenhouse gases, is not the largest anymore; that would be China. Where they have pollution like this from coal smoke and diesel:
librechik
(30,674 posts)put organic matter in, distilled H2O comes out. I'm pretty sure AZ has as much wet organic waste as it does people and places to put solar generators.
My point is that with existing technology and R&D, we could solve are lessen some of these problems. No need to give up yet.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)The current population of the American southwest is unsustainable given the available water supply, as are current agricultural practices. Climate change to some extent is unavoidable and will only exacerbate the problem. The only viable solution in the long term is going to be large-scale resettlement (which is going to put strain on resources and infrastructure elsewhere, which is another problem).
librechik
(30,674 posts)and managed to survive anyway.
It was a mistake to build an artificial megacity in the desert. I'll give you that.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)human settlement will no doubt survive, but I would be very much surprised if there were four million people in the Phoenix metro area in 50 years' time.
Cha
(297,154 posts)60s. It was so NICE!
Snapshot: Arizona's Populations, 1960 and 2006
Metro and State Population in 1960 and 2006
Metro Phoenix
1960: 663,510
2006: 4,039,182
http://morrisoninstitute.asu.edu/in-the-know/snapshot-arizonas-populations-1960-and-2006
marybourg
(12,620 posts)Chamber of Commerce. Phoenix metro is actually the 5th largest, but "horrific heat waves and windstorms" ? C'mon. Our heat isn't waves; it's our regular 5-month-long summer weather. And windstorms? Big deal. We wash the car.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)The article is a lot of crap.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Is this point over the head of everyone?
Every house must have solar panels and the desert must have solar farms.
Now we can discuss the power shortfall.
North Los Angeles county gets the sustained 105 degree temps. It is a desert despite outward appearances of green grass and golf courses. I liked Sedona. Lawns may be illegal as I saw wonderful xeroscaping with rocks and native vegetation.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Clouseau2
(60 posts)Wind turbines could also provide drinking water in humid climates following a breakthrough by a French engineering firm.
Eole Water modified your typical electricity-generating turbines to allow them to distill drinking water out of the air in a bid to help developing countries solve their water needs.
A prototype in Abu Dhabi already creates 62 litres of water an hour, and Eole hopes to sell turbines generating a thousand litres a day later this year.
intheflow
(28,462 posts)Two if those could provide water to my town. I wish I had an extra $1.2M to donate to the project. Though my podunk conservative town council would probably deny the windmills land because of their deep and abiding fear of anything that might help our community.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
eppur_se_muova
(36,259 posts)Oh, wait ... never mind.