General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat to make of this... Gabby Giffords posing with an AR-15
Last edited Thu Mar 14, 2013, 08:56 PM - Edit history (1)
This is an apparently authentic picture of Gabby Giffords posing with an assault rifle before she was later tragically shot. The picture was supposedly taken to help her toughen up her image for a political campaign. (I haven't seen the picture posted here anywhere.)
I don't think this changes our message. It just goes to show you how entrenched out gun culture is, and why its important to change it. And it doesn't matter whether we are gun enthusiasts or not.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I ask this as someone who has zero interest in banning the AR-15 platform.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)And for those of us who want to see stricter back-ground checks, I don't think it helps our cause. But that does not mean its not post worthy. This forum has to be more than just the place where "happy news" is posted.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's a fair question.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)I am simply pointing out how entrenched our gun culture is. She is now in favor of legislation she never would have backed only 2 years ago. I don't think its a stretch to call this fact.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)even when asking for better gun control laws. I don't think this old picture is important in the light of that.
Paul E Ester
(952 posts)marshall
(6,665 posts)it makes her middle of the road message stronger to bolster it not just with words but also with images.
Mika
(17,751 posts)Mika
(17,751 posts)aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)FarPoint
(12,287 posts)I find this Post grossly offensive.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)but who knows.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Someone somewhere can probably dig up a picture of her on a range with a semi-automatic rifle.
Ptah
(33,019 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)The OP gets a fail.
Ptah
(33,019 posts)aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)I think you owe me an apology.
JI7
(89,239 posts)it's too bad it took the horrible killing of little children for there to be a chance to try to do something and even now it's difficult.
but i'm hoping at least in terms of the culture it changes. with politicians not feeling the need to do stuff like this.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)It's just politics.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)DURHAM D
(32,605 posts)Didn't realize she is a fan.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)and then choose to self delete it. Thank you.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)The fact that even someone like Gabby Giffords would likely not have been on our side in this gun debate, had she not had a personal tragedy is forum worthy.
This shows how far we really have to go to get sensible gun legislation. This forum has to be about information. Not just "happy thoughts."
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Look at her shirt.
onenote
(42,581 posts)The watermark?
Ptah
(33,019 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)She did not run and hide from the photo. She did not claim a photoshop job. She came right out and said the truth: it IS a real photo that displays her commitment to gun owner rights, law enforcement, and the military.
Paul E Ester
(952 posts)Regarding the picture, she is showing good trigger discipline, has the muzzle safely pointed and looks like she was having fun.
What the heck is up with that target wearing a cal hat. Usually ranges frown upon lifelike targets.
She has made an amazing recovery, seeing that photo I can't imagine how much she has suffered because of that lunatic.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)Paul E Ester
(952 posts)aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)That was about her husband buying a gun. I thought this picture of her warranted its own storyline.
Turborama
(22,109 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)weapon. He was proving the point that the organization that him and Giffords is working hard to show americans, that robust background checks are absolutely needed to slow down gun related carnage in our society.
NickB79
(19,224 posts)Apparently he didn't realize that Tuscon had a 20-day waiting period for used guns while the police do a check to make sure it's not stolen or part of a crime investigation. He picked the worst possible city to attempt to prove how easy it is to purchase an assault rifle.
He claimed he was going to turn the rifle over to the police anyway to have then dispose of it, but he also purchased and walked out of the store with a .45 handgun for himself. WTF?
Serve The Servants
(328 posts)And an AR-15 to boot. Probably not a good photo to have surface considering the controversy over her husband's recent purchase.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)Leslie Valley
(310 posts)with an explanation of where it came from
https://www.facebook.com/GGiffords/posts/288672457929397
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)This does clear up the issue a little bit. I am going to edit the OP to include the un-doctured photo.
Paul E Ester
(952 posts)They are usually not allowed at civilian ranges. Good find. She still had fun.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)Lets put our heads back in the sand with regard to how hard gun culture has taken over our society.
I don't like the picture either. So lets pretend it doesn't exist.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)well, that's pretty straightforward...
petronius
(26,596 posts)But if we're making anything of that picture, I'd say the message is that 'gun culture' and gun owners is/are a lot more than RWers and teabaggers...
Leslie Valley
(310 posts)The CAL target is perfectly acceptable.
(GOD I hope I don't have to 'splain that joke)
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)most targets I have seen are a caricature of scary looking (older) bad guy.
Having her smiling at the bullet riddled picture is extra creepy.
Dare I say if that had been a politician we didn't like here at DU there would be some really nasty things being said?
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)It is creepy.
What does it say about us, when we have a democratic congresswoman who thinks it is to her political advantage to have pictures like this of her floating around.
We really have a lot of work to do.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)He looks very young.
Innocent, even.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Does anyone else see that?
randome
(34,845 posts)So this OP is meaningless.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)Because the OP and the picture prove just how wrong she was.
Who is the next gun touting person who will have their life changed by another person with a gun? Hopefully someone with extreme gun views will have a change of opinion based on OPs like this.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)people were killed. Giffords was said to be deeply affected by those that were killed, that is likely what's driving her full hearted efforts on gun control.
spanone
(135,789 posts)mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Creepy.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)That's nothing. Here's Mike Dukakis in a TANK!
When you're going to pander, go all out.
aaaaaa5a
(4,667 posts)are truly timeless.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)couldn't protect her and, after an experience such as Gabby's, it's perfectly logical to rethink and reform your position.
She doesn't owe anyone an explanation.
We all know what a gun has put her through.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,153 posts)The pictures were taken when Giffords was invited to visit the Tuscon PD and our troops in Afghanistan, respectively.
I don't think anyone is suggesting we take away semi-automatic and automatic weaponry from our police and military.
True to their namesake, Breitbart cropped the police officer out of the picture, making it look like Giffords loved tooling around with AR-15s for no particular reason. These assholes are shameless.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Giffords wants to keep military weapons out of the hands of civilians. The guy standing next to her is clearly military, possibly law enforcement, not civilian.
Where is the contradiction? Where is the controversy?
ON EDIT: the man in the photo is a Tucson SWAT Officer. Para military law enforcement.
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)And who has the big grin on their face after punching holes in a target that looks like a teenage boy?
demwing
(16,916 posts)to purchase those weapons, that's who.
I repeat - what is the contradiction? What is the controversy?
There is none.