General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan you you be fired for holding the door open?
My co-worker, being the gentleman that he is, held the door open for a woman in the office
He thought no more of it.
The woman later filed a sexual harassment charge against him, she claimed that when he opened the door for her, he positioned himself so that she was forced to come into contact with his own body..
I wasn't there, but had known and worked with man for a long time...I don't ever recall him being anything other than a gentleman,always talking proudly about his family....this incident broke him....he was eventually let go
I guarantee that man never opened another door for a female in his life..
And as for the woman? The woman stayed, she filed some other harassment charges too against other men...
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)HipChick
(25,485 posts)and support his family, when jobs were not too plentiful
Ian David
(69,059 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)the woman took issue with how he positioned himself to get close to her.
According to the post she has filed other claims.... which raises a red flag. In HR often the people who submit multiple claims... SH, or even WC often are found to be false.
JI7
(89,247 posts)door and opening it.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)What is it you are hoping to gain from starting yet another round with this?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)He opened the door and she walked through the formerly closed opening?
Why didn't she just say: after you?
It is evident that the woman in question is a temptress and is just looking to cause trouble. Yep.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)I don't want to trash all door related posts as someone may have an opinion on something door related like the proper way to align the beams on a garage door.
By adding the proper title I can properly screen the daily or weekly idiotic banter from my latest thread feed.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)Something I'll probably never have to deal with.
I've heard of good ones and bad ones, straight guys and women just can't seem to keep their privates to themselves at work.
JI7
(89,247 posts)but i think most cases do involve men harassing women.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Straight men have sexually harassed gay men, etc. it's about the abuse of workplace authority moreso than hormones.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Ian David
(69,059 posts)Never leave the toilet seat down.
It sends the benignly sexist message to women that they're either too weak to put the seat back down, or too stupid to check if it's down before they sit on it.
Always leave the seat up.
In fact, sometimes I remove the seat altogether, so women know that I respect their ability to re-assemble a toilet, all by themselves.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)DBoon
(22,356 posts)There is nothing like lying in bed late at night, hearing the dog enthusiastically drink from the toilet, then hearing the dog walk over to your bed, knowing his next move will be to lick you face.
for the laugh!
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)He was standing there and she walked past him?
Why didn't she refuse? I've done it many times... said... you first.
But NO. She is just looking to cause problems. Not all women are angels. Nope.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)That is a keyword. IF
You chose without knowing any actual facts to blame the woman.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)What IF she wanted to brush up against him? What IF she just said no? Why did she move towards him? Do women always do what men ask them to do? No. What "if" she was just looking to cause trouble? You do know not all women are angelic, right?
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)I took all that could be taken from the story and said if he intentionally touched her and this is true, he would be let go with just cause. Not making any statements about the man. Just legal aspect.
You want to go into the character of the woman. I do not know why.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And I see more than one side to the story.
It seems like if she walked towards him then she might have intentionally touched him. It does happen. Not all women are afraid of men. And I wished none were.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)I have my doubts.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)and some women, that it would be rude to not be grateful for the act of kindness.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)to have a man stand in front of a door while holding it open so you can brush up against them.
If this was happenig all the time to the woman, and if this 'story' is even true, I can see why she would begin to feel uncomfortable.
You just said women shouldn't be rude, so that's what she did, she wasn't rude, but she was uncomfortable and did have a right to have it addressed by the company.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Why would you make a mistake like that? Are you looking for trouble?
But at least you do question "...if this 'story' is even true..." so you get a pass.
Because I figure you might next admit that the woman maybe, possibly. could have, we don't know any better, was looking for trouble?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)of the door holding it open partially blocking her entrance. Instead of standing on the outside of the door holding it open by the handle.
I can see where that would make someone uncomfortable if it was happening day in and day out.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)doc03
(35,325 posts)holding doors open all of a sudden?
Response to doc03 (Reply #13)
NutmegYankee This message was self-deleted by its author.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)get reeled back.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)She and I were on different sides of that discussion, but at no time did she imply that men are sexist pigs.
There's enough heat in those threads without you jumping in to fan the flames, thanks.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Like many other male DUer's, I'm tired of the Misandry. Some of this stuff is just so over the top that we have to speak up.
Orrex
(63,203 posts)But you do yourself no favors by misrepresenting the behaviors that you claim to be opposing.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)No radical feminist insisted anything. This a completely manufactured controversy.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)*Yawn* I'm over the witch hunts. META is dead.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)fake controversies. Why is that? The witch hunt is yours. I am simply pointing about facts. It's unfortunate you find the truth so boring compared to spreading false rumors about fellow DUers.
Here is where the door meme first arose, for others not familiar with the con game that's being run through these door threads.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022511124
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)another poster gave a quick off the cuff explanation and the misogynists have been using it as an excuse to construct straw men all weekend.
Orrex
(63,203 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)Still, his misrepresentations don't justify broad-brush accusations of misogyny.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)Just providing a fair counter point to the "bunch of radical feminists" description.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)No one. Not a soul.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I've been so active in Women's rights, mainly access to abortion and contraception, that I'm stunned that I can be called a misogynist. I actually escorted woman into clinics past nut jobs. But I'm still a guy, and when the piling on starts on guys, I get annoyed. I'm tired of these gender fights that have been raging for weeks.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)That is exactly what happened. I said the same thing, without calling people misogynists. I don't think that advances the discussion and it is probably not accurate for many.
NO ONE complained about doors. That is the key point.
So if you get tired of gender disputes, don't feed this shit. No radical feminist complained about doors. In fact, no woman has said she gives a fuck about the door thing.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)as I am sure you don't really mean to call them all radical feminists.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)complained about doors, ever. Seabeyond simply gave it as an example of benevolent sexism when someone asked.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I've been sitting back and reading for quite a while.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)because I haven't seen it. You seem awfully interested in a controversy you claim to despise.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)and you found two women who said they didn't like it well into the discussion. That was not the origins of the door meme. That began long before in the boob thread.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022511124
So through all of these dozens of threads on doors, you found two women who said they didn't care for it, when ASKED. Again, this is a manufactured controversy.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Let's look at my post title one more time:
"Actually some have complained about doors in other threads."
I found some, and they were in ANOTHER thread.
And no, it's not manufactured. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022511124#post19 I read that thread too.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)She cited an article. She didn't say you were a sexist pig for holding the door open. Good lord.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)And sooner or later you are going to have to accept that good people may just disagree with you.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)is establish a link between traditional views of women and violence. Opening a door need not even be chivalrous. It can simply be polite. That is how I see it. Now you've looked hard to find two whole women on the site who object to having a door held open, which btw doesn't include Seabeyond. So if you want to hunt for reasons to be offended, no one is gong to stop you. But you're not getting any sympathy from me.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)"Recent debate about whether acts of "benevolent sexism" harm women are addressed in a new commentary published in Psychology of Women Quarterly (published by SAGE on behalf of the Society for the Psychology of Women, Division 35 of the American Psychological Association"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/10/111004121314.htm
Sorry, it's over the top to quite a few DUers.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)and you accused radical feminists of stirring up the issue. That clearly is far from the case. This is a manufactured issue. Your own evidence demonstrates as much.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I'm offended that some are implying that polite activities such as opening a door or helping lift a heavy box are sexism. It is a radical position. It is not a manufactured issue. It struck a nerve in many other DUers and we have been collectively saying "BULLSHIT" since.
And I'm still going to say BULLSHIT no matter what you call me or imply about my motives.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)but to insist any woman on DU made that a major deal is completely false.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)You keep changing what I said.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)You self deleted your post. Really, dude? Come on. If you don't have the courage of your convictions, what's the point?
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)"You said you were offended that women complained about opening doors"
That's not what I'm offended about.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)because all of these threads are about doors.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)She went on to say that she appreciates a door being held open for her and she reciprocates, just like all polite people. Now what about that makes you so upset?
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)But You'd never figure that out from DU these last few weeks. I got offended with the "Benevolent Sexism" discussion because it's taking good manners and politeness that men were raised with and making them shameful. It's completely over the top. Even the examples from the article were goofy.
"Benevolent sexism motivates chivalrous acts that many women may welcome, such as a man's offer to lift heavy boxes or install the new computer. While the path to benevolent sexism may be paved with good intentions, it reinforces the assumption that men possess greater competence than women, whom benevolent sexists view as wonderful, but weak and fragile."
I'm a 275 lb guy, so yeah, I can lift heavier objects than most women. It's physics, not sexism! And I've fixed computers for both men and women, usually those of baby boomer age and older. But despite the truth in that, I'll be accused of ageism in 3 2 1...
It's gotten old.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)become unoffended.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)And no, I won't become unoffended. It is offensive. Period.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Wow, you sound like some congressmen in a particular political party. Better strip the NSF from funding lest more of that research comes to light.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Going for hidden post number 16 I take it? Liberals can disagree on topics such as this. No need to implicitly call me a Republican or imply that a SCIENTIST (Mechanical Engineer) is against the National Science Foundation.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Is one in which she cited research. Now you can assert that research is weak, or however you want to characterize it, but to say that amounts to "radical feminists" on DU taking offense at men opening doors is clearly false. You are not telling the truth about the origins of this controversy.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Ah. We're done here.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)but if I had, I would apologize. You obviously like to find offense where none is given.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)"Wow, you sound like some congressmen in a particular political party. Better strip the NSF from funding lest more of that research comes to light. "
It's fucking obvious what is implied.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)I never even thought you were a Republican. I was merely pointing to the absurdity of your equating a quote about some research, which may or may not be bullshit, with a so-called "radical feminist" making a big deal about doors.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)It didn't bother me at all. It's not even slightly radical.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)That does happen often on a political board.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)seeing cultural norms differently.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I'm sick of threads implying that everything a man does is sexist. It's gotten old. It was so bad and had gotten so tiring that it was the straw that broke META's back.
opiate69
(10,129 posts)Who also happen to be the ones pushing this ideology, I think your word choice is apt.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_feminism
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Seabeyond merely gave holding doors open as an example of benevolent sexism. No one said they found it objectionable.
So these posts are part of an ongoing effort to trivialize feminists and demands for equal treatment of women. NO ONE gives a fuck about doors but those who have manufactured a crisis for their cynical, manipulative agenda.
opiate69
(10,129 posts)Obviously, some of you - including the author of the study in the post you keep linking to - feel that "benevolent sexism" is objectionable. Then, when asked what exactly benevolent sexism actually is, SB listed a bunch of behaviors, and holding doors for women not only was on the list, but was the first example. It`s really quite appropriate to deduce that, if benevolent sexism is objectionable, and holding doors open for women is an example of benevolent sexism, then it must be objectionable. Q.E.D.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)And people have fallen for it.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I kid. Pressure differential, you can't just open the door.
Or so I'm told.
rustydog
(9,186 posts)You can be fired if ones door-opening was done solely to force a member of the opposite sex to come into contact with you would be. isn't it a form of groping?
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)I think you made this up. I know you will vociferously deny it, but I still think you are lying!
Cheers!
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)while pulling them open, not pushing. I don't want to push and stand in a narrow doorway while she's forced to squeeze by me. It never occurred to me that this could be used in a sexual way.
Bizarre that a sexual harassment suit resulted from such a simple mistake.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)BainsBane
(53,031 posts)bluedigger
(17,086 posts)"this incident broke him....he was eventually let go"
That is not being fired for sexual harassment. At all.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)I hold the door based on specific rules that everyone else here are apparently oblivious too.
Good Weather- 3 second rule- all humans
one one-thousand, two one-thousand, three one-thousand.
I do the calculations in real time in as I grasp the handle to see if I should hold it open.
Anybody who needs help with opening a door in any way 5 seconds..
inclement weather add 3 seconds to above rules---
But if I don't know them, they need ID to get into the building or yes we may DIE or I could be fired
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)So people know exactly how this started.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022511124
boston bean
(36,221 posts)I weep for him.
If you work in a secure facility with strict rules that everyone must swipe their badge before entry, then allowing anyone to tailgate could result in disciplinary action.
This assumes your initial post was not a troll
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Until then, this sounds like the "poor wittle girlie who couldn't have a lemonade stand because of the mean tax man" when it is usually the right wing phony threatening her with it.
Evoman
(8,040 posts)I have a similar story...get your kleenex ready, because it's a sad story about how I was accused of sexual harrassment.
So I'm a little horny...it happens, I'm a man and I have needs. Anyways, what I do is make a door costume and then have my shlong painted silver, to act as a door handle.
So I go to work, and pretend to be one of the front doors, and when a lady approaches, I get ready for the unit-grabbing time of my life. But no, she screams and doesn't believe that I'm a real door, because apparently, doors don't have faces...or arms...or silver colored meat sausage. But does she just use one of the other 4 doors to come in? No. She instead calls security and has the nerve to accuse me of sexual harassment! When there are four other doors to come in!
Instead, she decides to ruin my life. Okay, I didn't get fired right away. And she was moved into the basement while I got her old office. But still, when an audit was done a year later and it was found out that I was dead last in sales and first in stapler stealing, I was let go first. I can't but help feel like she had something to do with it. Because she just couldn't use one of the other doors.
I'm still broken to this very day. I find little satisfaction in my CEO position, because I know any day one of the dolls who works for me could level a fake accusation of sexual harassment. Fuck it's tough being a man some days.
Pure gold!
This place has gone
Iggo
(47,549 posts)I mean come on, people. Jeez.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts)This door shit seems trivial to me.