General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom 2005: Freepers Brainstorm How to Break Teachers Unions
Fascinating stuff. Read past the post and on into the comments.
>>>The power of the teachers unions within the DemocRATic Party is enormous. A big percentage of delegates at their conventions are teachers.
Can someone start by volunteering to be in charge of an AT WAR WITH THE TEACHERS UNIONS ping list? Will someone or several someones volunteer to help with assigning tasks?
Make no mistake about it. Hillary Clinton is depending on these foot soldiers to carry her back into the White House.>>>
History is useful because it allows perspective. Perspective deepens understanding.
So the question is: why have so many Democrats... electeds ( a lot of them are $$$-off; so I at least understand that) of course, but also a lot people HERE, gone over to that "side"?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1519119/posts#comment?q=1
Aristus
(66,307 posts)I stand with teachers 100%. Union YES!
reteachinwi
(579 posts)Broke my heart.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)The new education "reforms" supported by both parties are doing a fine job of that.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts).... it became acceptable , even *respectable* for Democrats to echo the idiotic and hysterical ravings of the far right on the question of public education.
Was it about the same time that it became *profitable*? For example, around the same time Gates et al started pouring hundreds millions all over the issue like so much pancake syrup?
I'd like to think that most people running w. a D after their names are better than that. But what I'd like to think and what I increasingly find myself thinking are increasingly two different things.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)It's just like before the Iraq war...we who fear what is being done in our name are ignored and often insulted by our own party.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)"Just sit tight, commoners, and let the experts deal with the major crisis." And then we're left trying to solve a largely artificial problem.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Less that it passed than that so many DEMS supported it.
I would have believed it in the seventies. But got complacent/"moderate"/"pragmatic" by the 90's. Clinton was not Gingrich, after all.
Then: 2002... I could not believe what I was seeing and hearing. i.e. What many DEMs in congress were doing and saying.
There are a lot of parallels here, I'll give ya that.
Response to madfloridian (Reply #4)
Sadiedog This message was self-deleted by its author.