General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI've never said this before but here goes: You need to forward this to "All"
http://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/please-consider-and-promote-progressive-caucus-budget-plan-we-feel-it-most-equitable/10078lWfThis is a White House petition to "consider and promote the Progressive Caucus Budget".
If ever there was an issue the White House should be promoting, this is it.
Here's the 2013 Progressive Caucus Budget release from Reps. Keith Ellison and Raúl M. Grijalva ...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2013/02/05/Editorial-Opinion/Graphics/Balancing%20Act%20-%20Executive%20Summary.pdf
more coverage ...
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/27/1647221/progressive-sequester-plan-most-popular/
There are several plans floating around to replace the so-called sequester spending cuts scheduled to kick in on Friday. Senate Democrats and the Congressional Progressive Caucus have both released their own plans, while House Republicans have not released a new plan, but point to one passed in the last Congress.
According to a new poll commissioned by the Business Insider, the Progressive Caucus plan is the most popular of the three:
Surprisingly, the plan that polled the strongest was the House Progressive Caucus plan. More than half of respondents supported it compared to sequestration and just a fifth of respondents were opposed.
A plurality of people 28 percent believed the House Progressive Caucus Plan would have the least financial impact on them personally. This makes the most sense, as only 14 percent of respondents reported having income over $150,000.
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70
Budget of the Congressional Progressive Caucus Fiscal Year 2012
The Peoples Budget eliminates the deficit in 10 years, puts Americans back to work and restores our economic competitiveness. The Peoples Budget recognizes that in order to compete, our nation needs every American to be productive, and in order to be productive we need to raise our skills to meet modern needs.
Our Budget Eliminates the Deficit and Raises a $31 Billion Surplus In Ten Years
Our budget protects Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and responsibly eliminates the deficit by targeting its main drivers: the Bush Tax Cuts, the wars overseas, and the causes and effects of the recent recession.
Our Budget Puts America Back to Work & Restores Americas Competitiveness
Trains teachers and restores schools; rebuilds roads and bridges and ensures that users help pay for them
Invests in job creation, clean energy and broadband infrastructure, housing and R&D programs
Our Budget Creates a Fairer Tax System
Ends the recently passed upper-income tax cuts and lets Bush-era tax cuts expire at the end of 2012
Extends tax credits for the middle class, families, and students
Creates new tax brackets that range from 45% starting at $1 million to 49% for $1 billion or more
Implements a progressive estate tax
Eliminates corporate welfare for oil, gas, and coal companies; closes loopholes for multinational corporations
Enacts a financial crisis responsibility fee and a financial speculation tax on derivatives and foreign exchange
Our Budget Protects Health
Enacts a health care public option and negotiates prescription payments with pharmaceutical companies
Prevents any cuts to Medicare physician payments for a decade
Our Budget Safeguards Social Security for the Next 75 Years
Eliminates the individual Social Security payroll cap to make sure upper income earners pay their fair share
Increases benefits based on higher contributions on the employee side
Our Budget Brings Our Troops Home
Responsibly ends our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to leave America more secure both home and abroad
Cuts defense spending by reducing conventional forces, procurement, and costly R&D programs
Our Budgets Bottom Line
Deficit reduction of $5.6 trillion
Spending cuts of $1.7 trillion
Revenue increase of $3.9 trillion
Public investment $1.7 trillion
2naSalit
(86,323 posts)Thanks for the heads up.
hwmnbn
(4,279 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)then sent it on to everyone (almost)
That one shaded in gray at the top of the names - that's me!
J. P.
Cleburne, TX
March 17, 2013
Signature # 21
including Rachel Maddow:
I don't sign a lot of petitions and when I do I don't usually send them to everybody I know, and almost never to people I don't "know", but would like to . . . but this is different. Could use your support on this.
The 5 Things to Know: Budget Proposals from Paul Ryan, the Senate, and Congressional Progressive Caucus
http://nationalpriorities.org/en/blog/2013/03/14/5-things-know-paul-ryan-budget-senate-budget-and-congressional-progressive-caucus/
1. The budgets differ about whether deficit reduction should be a central goal
For Rep. Ryan and the House, deficit reduction is a major goal, while the CPC made job creation the centerpiece something reflected in its title, "Back to Work." Again, Senate Democrats did a little bit of both some new spending on job creation and job training initiatives and some deficit reduction. But together these budgets indicate that there's no clear consensus that deficit reduction should be the central goal. Indeed, while 72 percent of Americans listed deficits as a top priority, some 95 percent said the same about restoring the job market
http://nationalpriorities.org/en/analysis/2013/budget-proposals-2014/
go to the above link for a side by side comparison
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)Come on, people, this needs some support.
Even Krugman says that the Progressive Caucus budget makes more sense than any of the others.
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Not a single Rapeuglican would vote for it even if it ever made it to the floor, which it wouldn't.
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)And of course its clear that it could not make it past Boner to get to the floor of the House of Representatives. Not that this will ever become the President's position, no matter how many Democrats vote in favor of it.
Worried senior
(1,328 posts)marmar
(77,053 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,952 posts)propose eisenhower levels, take reagan era. SHARED SACRIFICE, not partisan.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)juajen
(8,515 posts)While it asked for my email address to change my password, it then said that my email address was wrong.
Why is this so hard to do? I sign petitions all the time. This just irritates the bejesus out of me.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)WHY isn't ANYBODY talking about the Progressive Caucus Budget?
The Progressive Caucus is the LARGEST CAUCUS in The House,
and ALL we hear about is The Tea Party Budget or the White House Budget.
Bill Maher featured this on his show on Friday.
He said that when polled on the Budget Items,
a wide MAJORITY or Americans AGREE with the Progressive Caucus Budget.
But NO Air Time by any Talking Heads or Political Celebrities.
Once Again, Americans are being forced into a False Dilemma:
[font size=3]AMERICA, You may pick one:
1)The Tea Bag Budget
OR
2)The White House Budget
[/font]
There ARE other options, and the Progressive Caucus Bidget is the BEST one for MOST Americans!!!
Somebody please send a copy to the White House!
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their rhetoric, promises, or excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
Scuba
(53,475 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Smilo
(1,944 posts)End too big to jail - No institution is above justice and accountability.
The country's financial institutions are out of control. As information continues to surface over the years, we discover ever more clearly that our financial institutions not only have no interest in serving We The People, but also are at times, simply criminal.
There can be no such thing as "too big to prosecute" in this country for justice to have any meaning at all. Mr. President, you can be impeached if you were to commit a crime - why are banks above the justice of the people? Your own US AG agrees: http://tinyurl.com/bgsvl9j
Money laundering for Colombian drug cartels, securities manipulations -- and their punishment is to pay a fine that equates to a fraction of the profits of their crimes? It's a joke.
The people demand more than empty deterrents. We demand real justice.
patrice
(47,992 posts)titanicdave
(429 posts)this needs serious considerations, especially since the majority of the American people support this budget
retired rooster
(114 posts)#107 and I be darned if signing that petition didn't make me feel good all over
k and r
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Thanks Scuba.
Thanks scuba, going to go sign.
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)jamesatemple
(342 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)done and done
patrice
(47,992 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)robinlynne
(15,481 posts)worth it!
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)for pure common sense!
Cha
(296,809 posts)harmonicon
(12,008 posts)If there's one thing that will sway executive decisions, it's an online petition.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)100,000 signatures in 30 days, so, yes, it is worth doing.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/how-why/terms-participation
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Death Star, dude. This is no different. This petition thing is a cute, sometimes neat public relations outreach thing, but it has zero impact on policy and never will.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)Did you catch that part while you were readying your weapons of mass disdain for us to deal with?
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)And people here, in starting a petition and getting people to sign it, are taking advantage of this to help increase public awareness of their close-felt issues. In this case, it's the Progressive Budget. And I for one would like to hear the White House comment on the Progressive Budget.
Thank you, however, for making me aware your contempt and disdain is something the rest of us should be proud to have leveled at us. It's just one more way we know we're on the right path. Goodbye!
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)It's going to be awesome!!
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)It took a silly petition idea and turned it into a great, fun response on our actual space program. It also promoted the petition page as some place Americans could talk to the White House about pretty much anything.
But, please, embarrass yourself some more with your shitty attitude.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Do you not know that you'll be disappointed? Do you actually think an online petition is going to influence policy?! IT WON'T. That WILL NOT HAPPEN, regardless of any response.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)Thank you for your concern over how I and the others in this thread spend our time and speak with our White House. Goodbye!
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)Give me a ring if you ever want to come visit us in Reality Land.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)Your diplomatic skills need some work. I'll let you have the last word since you seem to need it.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)To be perfectly honest, you appear to be the only one getting worked up about this. No one else is emphatically digging in their heels, accepting no other resolution other than the one they imagine.
There are, as once written, more things on heaven and earth than your philosophies...
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)blah blah blah.
I am worked up. Apart from voting, I think there's very little that the ordinary citizen can do to influence the political process, and most of those things involve how we simply live our day-to-day lives and interact with one another on a personal level. I see things like the White House petitions as nothing more than entertainment, but it's not just entertainment when people take it this seriously. When people take it seriously, it becomes another subversion of our energies from where they could have a real impact.
I think working against subversive political/PR tactics is one of the good things that can be done which could have a real impact. No online petition will ever have an impact, but letting politicians know that we see through their bullshit by refusing to participate in the charade may have an impact, or at the least force them to come up with new ways to placate the unsettled masses.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)#219
-p
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I think I'll share it on Being Liberal on FB, if you don't mind.
judesedit
(4,437 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)It's early yet...
GoneOffShore
(17,336 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)just curious.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Aren't other progressive sites on board with this?
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Makes me wish I was on face book or something like it.