Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"they are quite literally trying to induce an arms race"
It looks like the gun legislation that Congress is considering is stalling out not just on the assault weapons ban, but on whats probably an even more important part of the bill, universal background checks. Republicans just arent having it, and Harry Reid is considering taking it out of the bill in the hopes that it will pass. Sadly, this was entirely predictable. As Ive noted before, the rule of thumb is that if a regulation would cut into the profits of the gun industry, their lobbyists and Republicans will resist the regulation. Apparently, a loophole that allows criminals to buy guns from private dealers is just too profitable for gun manufacturers, and theyre going to resist closing the loophole, even if that means the murder rate remains high. As noted at Think Progress, universal background checks are effective, popular, and inexpensive, so quite literally the only thing standing in the way is a lobby that is intent on protecting gun industry profits above all else.
Making sure that criminals can get their hands on guns increases gun industry profits in two major ways. The most obvious is that if criminals are buying their products, gun manufacturers make more money directly. Even if theyre buying them secondhand, that increases demand on manufacturers, since someone has to buy them firsthand to sell them to the secondhand market.
But beyond just that, the gun industry benefits from having a lot of well-armed criminals around, because their presence justifies the purchase of more guns for the non-criminal consumer. Gun marketing is largely fear-based, which is why Wayne LaPierre is always on about how the world is just about to collapse into chaos and you need a mini-arsenal of his industrys products to protect yourself. They need people to believe that the streets are clogged up with criminals wielding guns, because thats how they convince you to buy more guns and bigger, more expensive guns. They are quite literally trying to induce an arms race, which is why, inevitably, the answer to every question of personal security is to buy more guns and line the coffers of the gun industry. If guns stopped falling in the hands of criminals and the nightly news didnt have a relentless flow of gun murders to report on, people might start to believe theyre safe, and they would buy fewer guns.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/20/universal-background-checks-threaten-gun-industry-profits-so-they-have-to-go/
Making sure that criminals can get their hands on guns increases gun industry profits in two major ways. The most obvious is that if criminals are buying their products, gun manufacturers make more money directly. Even if theyre buying them secondhand, that increases demand on manufacturers, since someone has to buy them firsthand to sell them to the secondhand market.
But beyond just that, the gun industry benefits from having a lot of well-armed criminals around, because their presence justifies the purchase of more guns for the non-criminal consumer. Gun marketing is largely fear-based, which is why Wayne LaPierre is always on about how the world is just about to collapse into chaos and you need a mini-arsenal of his industrys products to protect yourself. They need people to believe that the streets are clogged up with criminals wielding guns, because thats how they convince you to buy more guns and bigger, more expensive guns. They are quite literally trying to induce an arms race, which is why, inevitably, the answer to every question of personal security is to buy more guns and line the coffers of the gun industry. If guns stopped falling in the hands of criminals and the nightly news didnt have a relentless flow of gun murders to report on, people might start to believe theyre safe, and they would buy fewer guns.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/20/universal-background-checks-threaten-gun-industry-profits-so-they-have-to-go/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 1592 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"they are quite literally trying to induce an arms race" (Original Post)
phantom power
Mar 2013
OP
And then they'll say, "We've already handled it. Perhaps we'll re-visit the issue
winter is coming
Mar 2013
#9
RagAss
(13,832 posts)1. What exactly will remain in the bill?
ChangeUp106
(549 posts)5. School Safety
Which of course means armed guards. And who first proposed that idea?
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)2. Wharrgarbl
The author has NO CLUE why people buy firearms, and even less of an understanding of the psychology of how people behave when prohibitions are being proposed.
villager
(26,001 posts)3. good article. it is indeed entirely about profit over human lives
n/t
ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)4. WTF? No assault weapons ban. No universal background checks...
..then why the effin pass anything? What's the point? Seriously.
Why pass a bill the entire objective of which has been stripped from it?
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)6. Why! It's progress!
Oops. Forgot.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)7. To pass a bill.
It's like a score card.
Look! We got one!
Doesn't MATTER if it actually does anything.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)9. And then they'll say, "We've already handled it. Perhaps we'll re-visit the issue
in 10 or 20 years."
adieu
(1,009 posts)8. Because people judge
the book by the cover and not its content.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)10. Thanks for this. nt
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)11. wonder how many NRA bigwigs have investments in the prison industry.
the gun industry benefits from having a lot of well-armed criminals around, because their presence justifies the purchase of more guns for the non-criminal consumer. Gun marketing is largely fear-based, which is why Wayne LaPierre is always on about how the world is just about to collapse into chaos and you need a mini-arsenal of his industrys products to protect yourself.
EC
(12,287 posts)12. Makes me believe that the NRA is made up of
wife beaters and small time hoods that are afraid of background checks. What else could I think?
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)13. More like junk yard dogs...
where their civil rights are involved.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)14. Henry Miller:
For the man in the paddock, whose duty it is to sweep up manure, the supreme terror is the possibility of a world without horses.
-- Henry Miller in Tropic of Cancer"
Thus the defense business needs foreign enemies, the health care business needs disease, and the gun business needs criminals and violence.