General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnachronism, much?
I do high-end multimedia software development. Yet, I don't do Facebook (god, no), Twitter, or even Skype. Never used Skype.
I own an iPhone 5, but my favorite phone is a
(which is rigged into my digital phone system)
and I own some high-tech cars, but my favorite car is a 1978 stick shift that needs loving care.
I own a high-end electronic keyboard but my favorite keyboard is a hundred-year-old piano, exquisitely tuned.
I use MP3s out of convenience, but I really loves me the sound from an LP.
I can order fast food, but I'd much rather cook myself, and almost always do.
Am I bad for not fully embracing the 21st century?
Not at all.
Technology is great, but I only use what I need.
Libertas1776
(2,888 posts)and my favorite phone is one of these beauts
70 years old, works like a charm. I'm as progressive, social minded, forward thinking, liberal as they come, but when it comes to material things, i loves me some vintage. The quality on these items are sans egal compared to their modern counterparts.
Zax2me
(2,515 posts)Not really a debate.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Tab
(11,093 posts)I had one for my iPhone, but it seems not to work with the iPhone 5, but on my iPhone 3 it had the look, caused me to rotary dial, wait for the clickbacks, had the sound, the whole thing. Just search for 'rotary dial' and see what you find.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)A
I'm glad I'm not the only one.
I see Facebook as a massive invasion of privacy and want no part of it.
MineralMan
(146,262 posts)from the 1890s on my wall by the kitchen door. It still works fine, and I enjoy sitting on a stool and talking on it. It is hard to make a call, since it has no dial at all, but you can dial by pressing the earpiece cradle the right number of times, pausing between numbers. I normally use it for taking calls,though.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)What on earth would make you even ask that question?
olddots
(10,237 posts)The choice becomes jobs or robots that can't replace humans .
At some time the choice will have to be made between convenience and existence.
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)ETA: Yes, BTW, you are a horrid old Luddite. Get bent.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)just last week. The idea of being connected to a wall, not able to travel far (unless you had that really long, long cord to untangle,) was shocking to them.
I remember that there was something satisfying about the weight, the sturdiness, the ringing of real bells.