General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJon Hamm Is Being Treated Like an Actress. He Hates It
Jon Hamm has a great job playing repressed advertising executive Don Draper on Mad Men, what appears to be a terrific long-standing life partnership with actress and director Jennifer Westfeldt, and a great deal of critical respect for his work. Hes also got a large problem. Just as actresses have been plagued by paparazzi shots up their skirts and with flashes that can, at times, expose their nipples, Hamm's become perturbed by the proliferation of photos of and gossip about his penis, whether he's caught at an unflattering angle on the street or asked to wear underwear on the Mad Men set so he's not exposed by tighter-fitting suits.
"They're called privates for a reason. I'm wearing pants, for fuck's sake," he grumbled to Rolling Stone. "When people feel the freedom to create Tumblr accounts about my cock, I feel like that wasn't part of the deal."
For an earlier generation of actors, it wouldn't have been. But for actresses, having your anatomy scrutinized has long been part of the celebrity, er, package. The questions that Hamm faces, from whether he should just invest in some Calvins to whether he should be flattered by the attention, are ones actresses have fielded forever. It's a framing that acts as if the problem were the kind of underwear starlets and their stylists were picking out, rather than the photographers who zoom telephoto lenses in on their crotches. It says that if people get a glimpse of your body once, they're entitled to speculate about it forever, and you're a prude for reminding people that you're more than the sum of your junk.
What makes Hamm different from, say, Anne Hathaway, who had to weather discussion about the appearance of her nipples in her Academy Awards dress, is that Hamm isn't used to being objectified. He has outrage left to burn, rather than being exhausted by endless appearance-based prying and insane body standards. It might be easy for men to brush off how women are treated when they're unaffected. But when they're subject to the same standards, men often discover quickly how difficult to endure they really are.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/03/28/jon_hamm_s_penis_mad_men_actor_is_sick_of_being_singled_out.html
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Thanks for posting this.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Leave the guy alone, he is hung like a horse, and he is sick of all the attention for it.
2naSalit
(86,572 posts)all I can say is neenerneenerneener!
Call the whaaaambulance.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Why would a guy who doesn't want to be "objectified" forget to wear tighty wighties on set?
Hamm is playing the media like a tune.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Can we say "Record Viewership for Mad Men Season 6 Episode 1?"
A transparent (har har!) viral advertising campaign.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Boy, are people misunderstanding Hamm. That's his false modesty. He loves showing off his dick, but feigns the desire for privacy so he doesn't look like a show-off. Otherwise, he would wear underwear, and his coworker actually requested that he wear underwear on the set. The people who work with him say he "knows what he's got" wink wink.
But please, do continue. I wouldn't want to ruin a misguided op-ed.
MinneapolisMatt
(1,550 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)I only wore them a few times until I caught a look at myself in the mirror. Even with the tighty whities I probably wore at the time, there was a distinct outline there.
So I stopped wearing the pants.
That's what a guy does when he doesn't want to draw attention to himself in this way.
This guy is seeking attention, which is what sexy celebrities, both male and female, do.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)I think this article makes a really good point in the broader context.
Regardless of Hamm's true inner thoughts or motivations.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,000 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,000 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,000 posts)Mindful writers use the tools available to enhance comprehension for their readers and make the experience more pleasant.
Do what you want. You will anyway. But there is no need for belligerence in response to a thoughtful suggestion. Unless you think you are above reproach and how dare anyone suggest a formatting change.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Whether it be for their bodies or their talent.
I have a Hollywood sign to sell anyone that believes that.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,112 posts)If this had come out before "Bridesmaids", I wouldn't have been able to shake the image from my mind and the comedic effect of his scenes would have been lost. Similarly with gay actors who don't want to be outed. It's hard to shake the mind from knowing that he isn't the least bit like the character he's playing. And some outed gays careers do suffer and lose jobs because they're out.
Dilemma.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)he might have a future in hardcore pornography.
the camera likes huge weiners.
Mr. Sinister
(89 posts)It knows who the real star is and it wants full credit.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Imagine years of it never ending.
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)Where everyone has giant boners except Jon Hamm
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Handsome, sex symbol, and now supposedly well hung, too? Every man should have those problems.
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)All I say is that if can't take it, he should stop dishing it out.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,000 posts)Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)I hadn't heard that about him. Or are you just accusing him of something he hasn't done just because he is male?
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)That having been said, people, that is males or females all respond differently to anatomy exposure. Whether they're modest or exhibitionists, the important thing is to respect their wishes, either way.
tblue
(16,350 posts)Just a taste. Just enough to try that shoe on for a change.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)But this focus on certain body parts - female or male - is crass and excessive no matter what.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)Everyone "flaunted" what they had. The fabrics of that era were rather flimsy, and tight pants were the norm for men..Clever tailoring could alleviate the "problem" for him, but it is a show that tried to be true to the era ..
Underwear does not solve the tight pants issue
There will be a lot more people paying a lot closer attention when the season starts