Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Left Coast2020

(2,397 posts)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 10:11 PM Mar 2013

If this is a democracy, why is stuff discussed in private?

President Nixon first developed the idea of "Fast Track" in 1973 as a way to secure Congressional approval of trade agreements, and it has been a key to passing many unpopular agreements such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and NAFTA. As people have caught on to the offshoring of jobs and other detrimental consequences of these agreements, civil society now understands how important it is to not allow a president to circumvent the democratic role of Congress. Fast Track expired in 2007, so President Obama must have it re-instated in order to pass the TPP. His administration is moving to have Fast Track approved and hopes it will happen by this summer.


http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/15353-transpacific-partnership-will-undermine-democracy-empower-transnational-corporations

I really have a problem with this. Key word: "hopes" he can have it by summer.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If this is a democracy, why is stuff discussed in private? (Original Post) Left Coast2020 Mar 2013 OP
tansparency is a word you use to get elected - secret is way to behave after you're elected nt msongs Mar 2013 #1
Maybe its being a republic. CK_John Mar 2013 #2
Stop TPP-NAFTA on steroids lunasun Mar 2013 #3
Shock Doctrine means more and more is done in secrecy. woo me with science Mar 2013 #4

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
4. Shock Doctrine means more and more is done in secrecy.
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 02:20 AM
Mar 2013

Backroom meetings to solve a manufactured "crisis" are modus operandi now. Meanwhile, the corporate shills lecture us that we shouldn't jump the gun by criticizing legislation we haven't seen. Of course, then after it is passed, it is too late.

You are absolutely right that we are deliberately excluded from our own, supposedly "representative" government now as a matter of course. We are also subjected to endless shameful propaganda to get us to accept the exclusion as normal. The most insulting and outrageous recent example was probably the Obama administration's brazen refusal during the campaign to disclose with clarity his position on Social Security. The spectacle of Plouffe telling a reporter that he would not talk about that...that it was a matter for Senators behind closed doors....was a slap in the face of all voters and a deadly serious wake-up call that our elected "representatives" need a serious reminder that they work for us and not the other way around.

And the complicity of the corporate media...the proof that it has completely abdicated its responsibility as a check on abuse of government and governmental corruption....is the fact that we can get through an entire major election without any candidate's being held accountable on the major issues of the day, including policies on safety nets, the wars, and the outrageously metastasizing police state.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If this is a democracy, w...