Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 07:34 PM Feb 2012

Half a million a year to head a charity organization?

Found this, 2008 salaries for SGK:



This comes from their 2008 tax forms which can be seen here:

http://ww5.komen.org/uploadedFiles/Content/AboutUs/Financial/Komen%20Parent_990_3-31-09_PIC_Delivered_CD_01Dec09.pdf

you have to scroll down pretty far to get to the salaries. On your way though you can see who got Grant Money. Funny, the largest grant payout was 4.4 million, 3 times the size of any other grant. Guess who it was to? To the Susan G Komen Alliance. They are the biggest receivers of their own grants.


This reminds me of the days when I did lights and sound for "society fundraisers". "High Society" folks would spend 2 million dollars throwing a party to raise $100,000 for charity.

I believe this is the Republican idea of "charitable".

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Half a million a year to head a charity organization? (Original Post) SomethingFishy Feb 2012 OP
Why are their science folks making less money than their IT folks? justiceischeap Feb 2012 #1
Typical and, oddly enough, justifiable in $ terms cthulu2016 Feb 2012 #2
LMFAO.. I guess they are SomethingFishy Feb 2012 #4
The half mil she got was nothing compared to jaysunb Feb 2012 #3
You should browse the Charity Navigator website - enlightenment Feb 2012 #5
the Susan G Komen Alliance is a subset nonprofit that is basically a lobbying setup. hobbit709 Feb 2012 #6

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
1. Why are their science folks making less money than their IT folks?
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 07:37 PM
Feb 2012

Doesn't make sense to me... you'd think the science folks would make the most money.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
2. Typical and, oddly enough, justifiable in $ terms
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 07:43 PM
Feb 2012

Big charities are all about maximizing the take in $$$ and there is probably more variability in the CEO bang-for-the-buck in the fund-raising world than in conventional business.

If they bring in the bucks they are "worth" the pay.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
4. LMFAO.. I guess they are
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 07:51 PM
Feb 2012

I mean when you are running a charity organization that brings in 400 million a year and uses 80 million a year for actual charity work I guess it is worth it. Plenty left over to line the pockets of the people who "need" it.

jaysunb

(11,856 posts)
3. The half mil she got was nothing compared to
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 07:44 PM
Feb 2012

the guy that was VP for 6 months:

Peter F. Williams, VP ( 4-1-08 / 11-o8 ) $ 418,253.00

Also, it looks like the men make a lot more than the women supposedly running this outfit.

I WANT EVERY FUCKING DIME OF MY MONEY BACK !

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
5. You should browse the Charity Navigator website -
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 07:57 PM
Feb 2012

The salaries of some of the execs . . . well, it's eye-opening, to say the least.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Half a million a year to ...