Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Passes STOCK Act 96-3
Senate Passes STOCK Act
* By Steven T. Dennis
Updated: 6:37 p.m.
The Senate passed the STOCK Act on a 96-3 vote this evening after a surprisingly open amendment process forced lawmakers to take stands on a series of ethical restrictions and earmarks.
The bill, which clarifies that Members of Congress are subject to bans on insider trading, engendered a broader debate over public ethics, including issues such as whether lawmakers should own stocks at all, given their ability to affect individual companies.
President Barack Obama urged the House to pass the legislation, which he pushed in his State of the Union address last week. I will sign it right away, he said in a statement.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said the House would review the Senate bill, adding he intended to bring it to the floor next week.
Obama, however, said he wanted the bill to go further than it did.
While this is an important step to rebuild the trust between Washington and the American people, there is much more work to be done, like prohibiting elected officials from owning stocks in industries they impact, and prohibiting people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress from lobbying Congress, an idea that has bipartisan support outside of Washington, the president said. These are straightforward proposals that will help eliminate the corrosive influence of money in politics.
more...
http://www.rollcall.com/news/Senate-Passes-STOCK-Act-212096-1.html?pos=hftxt
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1222 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Passes STOCK Act 96-3 (Original Post)
babylonsister
Feb 2012
OP
Yay! At least it's SOMETHING that tries to control Congress' unethical actions. nt
Honeycombe8
Feb 2012
#6
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)1. They will find a way around the new legislation.
60 minutes blew the whistle on them.
You and I don't mean shit individually, but damn, a lot of people still watch 60 minutes.
gopiscrap
(23,756 posts)2. Who were the 3 who voted
against it?
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)3. Coburn R-OK, Burr R-NC and Bingaman D-NM
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)5. Thanks for looking that up. Bingaman...one to watch warily. nt
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)4. Here you go
Only three senators voted against final passage: Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.).
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)6. Yay! At least it's SOMETHING that tries to control Congress' unethical actions. nt
Angleae
(4,482 posts)7. It will get further watered down in the house.
With enough loopholes big eoung you can drive a truck through.