Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

apples and oranges

(1,451 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:30 PM Feb 2012

If Komen reverses their stance, anti-choicers will boycott;

if they don't, then pro-choicers will boycott.

Komen really fucked things up here and now both sides are polarized. Even if they were to reverse their stance on Planned Parenthood, there is no way that they will ever have the amount of donations they once had, which allowed them to give about 700k per year to PP.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Komen reverses their stance, anti-choicers will boycott; (Original Post) apples and oranges Feb 2012 OP
"Pro_Lifers" will protest the lifesaving work of the Susan G. Komen Foundation rustydog Feb 2012 #1
Most of the anti-choicers will say Jesus, to answer your question. The Genealogist Feb 2012 #3
Jesus mentioned the poor 407 times. Fawke Em Feb 2012 #30
Amen Aerows Feb 2012 #33
The lady that in the head of NOW said that they did politized this issue. She said within 5 yrs southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #2
whether they reverse or not Raine Feb 2012 #4
Agreed. If 700k people send at least one dollar to PP every year apples and oranges Feb 2012 #5
There s one way they could recover nadinbrzezinski Feb 2012 #21
It is lethal Aerows Feb 2012 #34
They might as well stick to the path they have started down. Curmudgeoness Feb 2012 #6
I have decided that all american girl Feb 2012 #28
It's pretty much over zipplewrath Feb 2012 #7
Aren't certain non-profits required to be neutral in politics? Komen is probably one of those. LiberalFighter Feb 2012 #14
RWers poison everything they touch. Bozita Feb 2012 #8
Yes they do. Zoeisright Feb 2012 #23
Agreed, Komen tried to appease a small fringe minority, but pissed off the larger group ShadowLiberal Feb 2012 #9
I'm starting to wonder if the Komen brass knew EXACTLY Blue_Tires Feb 2012 #31
Burn down the house from inside Aerows Feb 2012 #35
I think we are seeing a preview of the election maryellen99 Feb 2012 #10
True. They can't get a majority honestly, so they divide and conquer with wedges. MatthewStLouis Feb 2012 #37
they've boxed them into a corner gopiscrap Feb 2012 #11
Don't forget the corporate angle jeff47 Feb 2012 #12
I was thinking the same earlier when I looked at their partners list Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #15
Have you seen their pay-chart for top staff? Chan790 Feb 2012 #22
Yes - their financials are on their site. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #36
Me, too. Iggo Feb 2012 #27
I'll boycott even if they do reverse frazzled Feb 2012 #13
How, exactly, will they boycott the Komen foundation? markpkessinger Feb 2012 #16
You are thinking individuals. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #18
They can't reverse it. What are they going to do - say investigations Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #17
Have you seen this? countryjake Feb 2012 #19
And Seven California Komen affiliates oppose defunding Planned Parenthood Tx4obama Feb 2012 #26
LOL! And now the reverse backlash Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #38
in some ways i'm kind of Glad it happened, it has put awareness on the Komen marketing JI7 Feb 2012 #20
Except there are WAY more of us than there are of them. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #24
and Fox reports - Morning Dew Feb 2012 #25
1.2 Million people on the mall that day, and CNN spent the day reporting on the "NASCAR voter" Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #32
Personally, I'd consider it an honor if the RWers boycotted me. hobbit709 Feb 2012 #29

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
1. "Pro_Lifers" will protest the lifesaving work of the Susan G. Komen Foundation
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:32 PM
Feb 2012

When will someone of modest import tell these groups to simply go to Hell.
Who died and appointed these hateful "humans" our keeper?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
33. Amen
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:48 PM
Feb 2012

I don't understand why such evil people don't realize that fact. He also mentioned homosexuality exactly no times, but cared for a prostitute. Using religion to advance an agenda that can only be called evil must be a full time job for some. I care about human beings 24/7/365 and that's what the Bible I READ told me to do.

I'm guessing some read a different book than I did.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
2. The lady that in the head of NOW said that they did politized this issue. She said within 5 yrs
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:36 PM
Feb 2012

there well may not be a Komen Foundation because such of a big backlash.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
4. whether they reverse or not
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:48 PM
Feb 2012

they've shown their true selves as to what side they're on ... they will never recover and they shouldn't.

apples and oranges

(1,451 posts)
5. Agreed. If 700k people send at least one dollar to PP every year
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:55 PM
Feb 2012

then, that would replace the money Komen was giving.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
21. There s one way they could recover
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:56 AM
Feb 2012

But the window is short.

Every member of the board and the woman who wrote the policy need to leave, period. No golden parachutes, no exit compensation, no exit interview.

They have one more news cycle for this to have a prayer of working. Otherwise I agree with the head of NOW, this s lethal.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
34. It is lethal
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:50 PM
Feb 2012

And sad that such a fine organization had to fall into the sewer because of some right-wing extremist. They hired her, though, so it's all on them. You know nothing good is going to come of an extremist being in charge of anything.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
6. They might as well stick to the path they have started down.
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:56 PM
Feb 2012

I, for one, will not be changing my mind about support for Komen, even if they do decide to reverse this stupid decision. I do not think I am alone. They might as well keep the Pro-Life crowd so that they have someone to support them.

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
28. I have decided that
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 09:39 AM
Feb 2012

Sadly, I have to agree with you. I decided today that I would never buy a pink ribbon thingy again, even if they reverse their decision. This was all political and nothing more. If it was based on an "investigation," then why don't they have a solution set up to deal with all the women who will not be served by PP. I haven't seen anything about this. I saw Ms Brinker on with Anderea Mitchell, and I thought she said they were looking into that. Wouldn't a responsible organization already have that figured out. Putting ideology before women is despicable.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
7. It's pretty much over
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 11:10 PM
Feb 2012

They entered the political fray and there's really no way out. And to some extent, they've been exposed for what they are which is mostly a self promoting organization. I think it's going to be hard to "unring that bell".

ShadowLiberal

(2,237 posts)
9. Agreed, Komen tried to appease a small fringe minority, but pissed off the larger group
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 11:15 PM
Feb 2012

What's really ironic and sad about this is that Komen could have just ignored the right wingers attacking them for the their planned parenthood funding, and most people would have continued to not care about it.

How many people here honestly knew that Komen gave any money to Planned Parenthood? I certainly didn't, and I get a majority of right wingers didn't either, or if they did know didn't care enough to not donate to Komen.

That's mistake #1 Komen made, creating such a big story about Planned Parenthood funding that most people didn't know or care about.

The second problem Komen made was making so many people care about the Planned Parenthood funding by cutting it off in such a blatantly political way that it was viewed as an attack on women's healthcare and abortion rights.

It's not a good public image to be seen as taking a side on a controversial issue like abortion when your charity/business has NOTHING to do with abortion, better to be seen as having nothing to do with abortion then as having an opinion on it.

It's MUCH worse to be seen as attacking women's healthcare however, that will anger people on both sides of the abortion debate.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
31. I'm starting to wonder if the Komen brass knew EXACTLY
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 10:10 AM
Feb 2012

what they were doing from the start, trying to burn down the house from the inside...

maryellen99

(3,788 posts)
10. I think we are seeing a preview of the election
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 11:28 PM
Feb 2012

Now that Gay Marriage is not a successful wedge issue for the wing nuts,they will go back to using abortion as the big wedge issue.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
12. Don't forget the corporate angle
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:12 AM
Feb 2012

A lot of companies slapped pink on their products as a donation to a "safe" charity. It was a donation that did not upset anyone. Komen made a lot of money from that.

Now that Komen has decided to become political, they are no longer safe for corporate donations.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
15. I was thinking the same earlier when I looked at their partners list
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:26 AM
Feb 2012

How many companies are now going to distance themselves because of Komen jumping into the political fray, and how quickly. That pink ribbon is toxic right now - doubtful too many want it labeled with their brand.

Its like someone pulled a pin on the grenade and tossed it into the board room of every major company in the US.

Will be interesting to see what the Komen board does about current management as well given that $500k/annually has bought them a CEO who doesn't know the definition of damage control.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
22. Have you seen their pay-chart for top staff?
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:58 AM
Feb 2012

That $500k is a drop in the bucket. Between about 20 people with alphabet-soup titles (CEO, CFO, COO, CMO, VP, etc.) they have about $8M in salary. That's for the 20 senior staff members. As an NPO, you can pull their financial disclosures (IRS Form 990) from Charity Navigator or Guidestar. The amount of money they have going to overhead as opposed to the cause or research or treatment is ridiculous.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
36. Yes - their financials are on their site.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 03:58 PM
Feb 2012

It is astounding.

And yet, only 24% goes to research - which was the big, jaw dropping tell to me.

I know they have "reversed" this (ie, the board told Brinker to walk it back and she issued some weasel words to kick the can down the road until the next grant period), but 24% while top execs are ALL pulling in 6 figures?

Enlightening to say the least.

My mind is made up about them.

Iggo

(47,545 posts)
27. Me, too.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 09:34 AM
Feb 2012

I keep thinking of all those NFL players decked out in pink trim for an entire month. I wonder if they'll do it again next year.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
13. I'll boycott even if they do reverse
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:19 AM
Feb 2012

Sorry, but they've totally lost my respect. Nothing they can do at this point would make me return to supporting them financially (which I have done in the past, for friends doing the walk).

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
16. How, exactly, will they boycott the Komen foundation?
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:27 AM
Feb 2012

By withholding donations? Is the percentage of donations that come from anti-choice folks larger than the amount they receive from pro-choicers, along with those who may oppose abortion but aren't inclined to make an issue over Planned Parenthood? I find that hard to believe.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
18. You are thinking individuals.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:30 AM
Feb 2012

Think corporate donations, sponsorships, partnerships.

They are toxic right now - no longer neutral and 'safe'.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
17. They can't reverse it. What are they going to do - say investigations
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:29 AM
Feb 2012

don't matter?

No - they painted themselves into a corner by trying to covertly defund an organization that is involved in unrelated activities that they disagree with.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
19. Have you seen this?
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:33 AM
Feb 2012
http://www.komenoregon.org/Newsroom/PlannedParenthoodFundingResponse.shtml

Komen Oregon OPPOSES Headquarters' Decision

A Message from the Oregon & SW Washington Affiliate Board of Directors - UPDATED - As of February 2nd, 2012
Our local Affiliate has received many inquiries regarding Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s national decision to change its granting guidelines and performance criteria. Specifically, the effect these changes will have on Planned Parenthood and other Komen grantees. Komen Oregon is opposed to the new national Komen community grant eligibility policy. Not only will this decision affect Planned Parenthood, but also any other organization under investigation. The implications will be far reaching, having an adverse effect on numerous grantees. Ultimately it will compromise our ability to provide life-saving access to breast cancer screening and treatment for the most vulnerable women.

•We, the Affiliate Board of Directors, have officially submitted a letter to Komen Headquarters asking that they reconsider this policy.


My WA Sen. Patty Murray was on our news this evening talking about this split, saying she is in support of both Oregon's and Washington's appeal to their national offices.


(edited to add)


http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/the-komen-foundations-partisan-attack-on-planned-parenthood-the-women-who-are-upset-the-response-from-the-local-chapter-and-what-you-can-d/Content?oid=12241904

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
26. And Seven California Komen affiliates oppose defunding Planned Parenthood
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 04:11 AM
Feb 2012


All seven California Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure Foundation affiliates have come out in opposition to the group’s new, national policies that bar them from funding Planned Parenthood. Here’s a statement they just sent to California’s congressional delegation:

SNIP

See statement here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/seven-california-komen-affiliates-oppose-defunding-planned-parenthood/2012/02/02/gIQAncMJlQ_blog.html


Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
38. LOL! And now the reverse backlash
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 04:36 PM
Feb 2012

Kicked open Pandora's box by going political. No winners here. None.

Check out these nuggets of feedback on the so-called 'reversal':

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/03/1061445/-Komen-Being-Castigated-by-Wingnuts

Happy to see their fundraising/administrative budget and expenditures exposed. Damn. Everyone in management with a 6 figure salary and 24% to research.

Put a fork in 'em.

JI7

(89,244 posts)
20. in some ways i'm kind of Glad it happened, it has put awareness on the Komen marketing
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 01:46 AM
Feb 2012

and all that pink crap .

now people will donate to PP and other cancer research organizations where the money will actually go towards research.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
24. Except there are WAY more of us than there are of them.
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 03:48 AM
Feb 2012

They made the mistake anti-choicers always make; they think their megachurch is the whole fucking world and they spend all their time in a fundy Jesus echo chamber.

Meanwhile, the pro-choice majority in this country is generally complacent, unless roused by shit like this.

When we do wake up and make our presence known, the glassy-eyed godbags are always, like, "shit- Heavens! where did THEY all come from?"






Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
32. 1.2 Million people on the mall that day, and CNN spent the day reporting on the "NASCAR voter"
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 12:34 PM
Feb 2012

it was fucking appalling, is what it was. I was there.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Komen reverses their s...