Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 03:29 AM Feb 2012

Nancy Brinker, is safe, as far as the board is concerned.

just got off the phone with a Komen board member, and he confirmed that the announcement does not mean that Planned Parenthood is guaranteed future grants — a demand he said would be “unfair” to impose on Komen. He also said the job of the group’s controversial director, Nancy Brinker, is safe, as far as the board is concerned.

As some were quick to point out, the statement put out by Komen doesn’t really clarify whether Planned Parenthood will actually continue to get money from the group. The original rationale for barring Planned Parenthood was that it was under investigation (a witch-hunt probe undertaken by GOP Rep Cliff Stearns). Komen said today that the group would “amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political.”

Does that mean Planned Parenthood will get Komen grants in the future?

I asked Komen board member John Raffaelli to respond to those who are now saying that the announcement doesn’t necessarily constitute a reversal until Planned Parenthood actually sees more funding. He insisted it would be unfair to expect the group to commit to future grants.

“It would be highly unfair to ask us to commit to any organization that doesn’t go through a grant process that shows that the money we raise is used to carry out our mission,” Raffaelli told me. “We’re a humanitarian organization. We have a mission. Tell me you can help carry out our mission and we will sit down at the table.”



Pressed on whether Brinker had been forthcoming, Raffaelli insisted: “Nancy was not trying to mislead anyone.” Asked if there would be an internal look at how Brinker handled the episode, Raffaelli only said there would be some kind of general look at how to prevent the politicization of grant-making in the future. Raffaelli blamed himself for the failure to handle the politics of this mess adequately, and stressed that Brinker’s career had been devoted to breast cancer prevention, and not politics.

Asked if Brinker’s job was safe, Raffaelli said: “Yes.” He added that the board “unequivocally” stood behind her.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/komen-caved-or-did-it/2012/02/03/gIQA9tS9mQ_blog.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nancy Brinker, is safe, as far as the board is concerned. (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Feb 2012 OP
Komen who? donheld Feb 2012 #1
Of course she's safe--she's Susan Komen's little sister, so she'll keep her half million dollar MADem Feb 2012 #2
The lazy TV media Ichingcarpenter Feb 2012 #3
How can they consider Brinker's job safe? JohnnyRingo Feb 2012 #4
It's HER charity -- she isn't going anywhere obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #6
This right here... MicaelS Feb 2012 #7
The hell with Brinker. I want to know if Handels job is safe. n/t Bonhomme Richard Feb 2012 #5
Let the Theocratic Komen Foundation sink. Dawson Leery Feb 2012 #8

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Of course she's safe--she's Susan Komen's little sister, so she'll keep her half million dollar
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 03:49 AM
Feb 2012

paycheck....for now, anyway. They need her inside the tent pissing out, because if she was outside the tent, she could do a helluva lotta pissing in; she could claim they "forced her" to change the policy or some other bullshit, and she opposed it, and her late sister would have too--you know how people will lie when they're put on the spot. She's been challenged and so has the board, they are terrified that no one will donate anymore so they are going to bullshit like a mighty herd--of course the truth is the first casualty!

I think what they're actually saying is that they will wait till this shit dies down, and then "defund" PP later when no one is looking.

Screw them--like the gangsters say, they're dead to me! I tell all my friends what bums they are; I urge everyone to do likewise!

JohnnyRingo

(18,618 posts)
4. How can they consider Brinker's job safe?
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 05:39 AM
Feb 2012

She made a decision that crippled the charity and charges $400,000 a year to do it.
I can come in and screw the organization up for less than 100k, but no one expects me to be able to run a charity.

Is this going to be another one of those situations where the company says they're afraid she'll go elsewhere if they paid her less?

On edit:
I didn't know there were family ties. Too bad for a charity that up til now made such great progress raising awareness.

obamanut2012

(26,046 posts)
6. It's HER charity -- she isn't going anywhere
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 10:09 AM
Feb 2012

She's the Founder and it's a private charity. She is safer than houses.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion» Nancy Brinker, is safe, ...