Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Shanti Mama

(1,288 posts)
Thu May 2, 2013, 09:27 PM May 2013

Help needed with "the two parties are equally guilty" discussion

In a Facebook conversation I'm having a 'friend' cited Senator Leahy's blocking of 42% of Bush's nominees when Chair of the Senate Judiciary committee as an example of Democrats being equally guilty of partisan obstruction.

I did a quick google search for data but can't find specific info on the percent of Bush and Obama nominees blocked by Congress.

Anyone?
Many thanks.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Help needed with "the two parties are equally guilty" discussion (Original Post) Shanti Mama May 2013 OP
"Help me refute....." Right. WinkyDink May 2013 #1
What's the problem? Shanti Mama May 2013 #2
Bruce Ackerman and Laurence Tribe started calling for a "slowdown" of judicial confirmations in 2001 Recursion May 2013 #3
Thanks Recursion. Shanti Mama May 2013 #4

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
3. Bruce Ackerman and Laurence Tribe started calling for a "slowdown" of judicial confirmations in 2001
Thu May 2, 2013, 09:40 PM
May 2013

Once Jeffords flipped the Senate to our side, Leahy controlled the Judiciary committee and did slow down confirmations to roughly the rate they were during the last two years of Clinton's term, but since those positions (from Clinton's term) were still unfilled, that led to a greater number of hold-ups. I don't know that I could show you a single document that said "42%" but it's not an unreasonable number.

A lot of the bottleneck cleared when the GOP took back the Senate in '04 and the "Gang of 14" (or however many it was in that year; it's always the same people) agreed not to filibuster half of the remaining nominees. The real odd bit was that after that whole thing, Specter (still an R at that point) didn't push the cleared ones through when he had the chance.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Help needed with "the two...