Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
Thu May 9, 2013, 01:59 PM May 2013

You can kiss Overtime goodbye

Yesterday the Working Families Flexibility Act passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by a vote of 223 to 204. The bill allows employers to offer compensatory time off (comp time) to employees who work overtime, instead of paying time-and-a-half when a worker's weekly hours exceed forty.

Representative Martha Roby (R-AL), who introduced the bill, suggests the legislation would relieve work-family pressures parents--especially moms--feel, by letting them potentially take more time off in lieu of overtime pay they would otherwise collect. Stating that the comp time off could be used "to spend more time with their children, attend parent-teacher conferences, or care for an aging relative," the bill sounds like a step toward a family-friendly America, especially at a time when the U.S. ranks only a poor 30th on the just-released "Best Place to be a Mother" list. Yet opponents say it's the wrong approach. Low wage workers, in particular, need schedule predictability and consistency, to plan their household budgets and child care. They need the overtime dollars, not a promise of time off later--time that may not coincide anyway with their family's routine or emergency needs.


http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/05/congresss-doomed-misguided-attempt-to-help-working-families/275718/

Fortunately, it may not pass the Senate and if it does, Obama threatens to veto.

If this does pass, it will allow employers to work people endless hours at peak times and virtually lay them off at times of lower needs, all without paying for the extra hours or the trouble of actually laying them off. The American worker gets screwed again!



17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
2. I'd like to believe that, but if even Social Security is negotiable,
Thu May 9, 2013, 02:01 PM
May 2013

no other New Deal element is sacred, since Social Security is the absolute bedrock upon which all other New Deal bargains are founded.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
5. I kissed overtime goodbye 10 years ago when I took a position on salary.
Thu May 9, 2013, 02:10 PM
May 2013

It does offer me quite a bit of flexibility as you legally only have to work like 6 hours per day to get paid for the full day, so when I was hourly before that and had a doctor appointment I would clock out and take off for 2 hours and not get paid for it. Now on salary they are a lot more flexible, so they just let me take the 2 hours off and not worry about making it up.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
6. just watch
Thu May 9, 2013, 02:11 PM
May 2013

The 1% puppets will make it law. I don't trust any of them.

What a half assed, lame, condescending excuse.

Flexibility for the family. There are just enough dumb shits out there that actually believe corporate America is genuinely concerned about family flexibility.

This is about working for less money. Period.

Wounded Bear

(58,647 posts)
7. It's supposed to die in the Senate....
Thu May 9, 2013, 02:14 PM
May 2013

I hope so.

The worst case scenario is that you build up 3 weeks of "comp time" and then get laid off.

Whoops. Tough times, eh?

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
9. Probably will. And maybe the next one, too.
Thu May 9, 2013, 02:49 PM
May 2013

But when it gets attached to something too important, watch it pass and be signed into law.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
16. I still think requiring bills to go unnamed would mediate a lot of that crap
Thu May 9, 2013, 05:50 PM
May 2013

It's much easier to pass the Anyone Who Opposes This Eats Kittens Alive Act than it would be to pass HR 3153, even if the content was identical, and good lord are US legislation names loaded these days.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
13. If they wanted to help working families, why dont they ask working families what they need?
Thu May 9, 2013, 03:40 PM
May 2013

Instead they go to big business and ask them what they need to save on labor expenses and then dress it up as a pro-worker bill.

This is a farce.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
14. Exactly - but Obama will veto
Thu May 9, 2013, 03:53 PM
May 2013

It's time to write a nice note to the WH reminding our president that we expect him to veto.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You can kiss Overtime goo...