General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Ginsburg: Roe v. Wade not 'woman-centered'
Instead, the landmark decision gave abortion-rights opponents a rallying point that is still used today, Ginsburg the second female justice ever appointed to the court told a packed crowd Saturday at the University of Chicago Law School auditorium.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-justice-ginsburg-roe-v-wade-not-womancentered-20130511,0,3079568.story
It's an interesting article.
cali
(114,904 posts)she makes the case that without Roe, abortion would be more accessible. I don't buy it for a nanosecond.
mucifer
(23,525 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)She makes the case that Roe v Wade is about doctors and not the right of a woman to choose... I think she is flat out 100% correct!
Roe v Wade could have overturned the Texas law, and paved the way for more states to legalize abortion. Eventually a case would have been argued that it is a woman's right to choose for herself. Roe V Wade buried the chances of such a case being argued before the court. That is her point. Just look at what has been happening over the past 40 years and particularly over the past decade!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Air Force case might have been better.
Her arguments in Frontiero were brilliant.
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)been a furious backlash at each state level.
The fact is that women were dying of illegal abortions, pre-Roe. Once Roe was decided, women stopped dying from illegal abortions. It was a dramatic decrease. I am glad that those lives were saved.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Roe is more about the privacy of decisions between doctors and patients than it is about abortions specifically.
Gman
(24,780 posts)And has even been cited in many privacy cases argued before the court.