Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,004 posts)
Mon May 13, 2013, 05:06 PM May 2013

Casey Anthony motion slams Judge Belvin Perry for 'Today Show' interview

In a new court filing, Casey Anthony is blasting Judge Belvin Perry for his interview a week ago on NBC's "The Today Show."

Anthony's bankruptcy lawyer said Perry's interview "completely eviscerated any possible chance" that Anthony might receive a fair trial in Orange County.

"Judge Perry revealed confidential information concerning events that occurred during the criminal case," the motion said.

In the interview, Perry said he believed there was "sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict of murder in the first degree" in her criminal case.

Read more: http://www.wesh.com/news/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/casey-anthony-motion-slams-judge-belvin-perry-for-today-show-interview/-/13479888/20122924/-/ox6dxu/-/index.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Casey Anthony motion slams Judge Belvin Perry for 'Today Show' interview (Original Post) alp227 May 2013 OP
Evidently Anthony is $790k in debt including $500k for her defense attorney?? Blue_Tires May 2013 #1
Meh. HappyMe May 2013 #2
Throwing spaghetti against the wall OldHippieChick May 2013 #3
Why did the judge grant an interview at all? Demoiselle May 2013 #4
Inappropriate judicial conduct, in my opinion. DirkGently May 2013 #6
no pity for the world's luckiest murderer, but judges geek tragedy May 2013 #5

OldHippieChick

(2,434 posts)
3. Throwing spaghetti against the wall
Mon May 13, 2013, 06:01 PM
May 2013

and hoping something sticks. This motion is to prevent a woman who claims Anthony slandered her and wants a stay from BC court to pursue her cause of action. Don't think the judge did too much to harm that case one way or the other.

Demoiselle

(6,787 posts)
4. Why did the judge grant an interview at all?
Mon May 13, 2013, 06:22 PM
May 2013

I haven't followed this case carefully...but why would a judge talk about it to a such a vast audience? Or to any audience at all, for that matter? Good grief!

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
6. Inappropriate judicial conduct, in my opinion.
Mon May 13, 2013, 06:42 PM
May 2013

Perry favored the prosecution heavily in all the footage I saw. People got so caught up in hating Anthony they ignored all the b.s. coming from the state's side, including Perry's conduct of the case and the ludicrous conduct of the prosecutor.

Either way, though, he has no business commenting on the merits of the case in public. I don't know if it's an actual violation of judicial ethics, but it's certainly in incredibly poor taste. Now everyone who appears in front of him will have to wonder if he will deliver his own "verdict" on a talk show later on.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Casey Anthony motion slam...