Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon May 13, 2013, 08:41 PM May 2013

Is Smith v Maryland relevant to AP?

Here's a good response from the comments at Think Progress.

Matthew Rusk

The SCOTUS ruled in Smith v Maryland in1979 that who you call is not constitutionally protected because you have no expectation of privacy since you gave that number to the phone company. There is no constitutional need for a warrant, though Congress has the right to pass legislation requiring it (which I do not believe they have done). The AP is complaining that their First Amendment right as journalists are being threatened or interfered with, but they didn't seem to mind while private citizens have had their First Amendment rights to speech and free association threatened in the same way for almost 25 years.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/05/13/2005021/doj-yemen-aqap/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Maryland

Why The Department Of Justice Is Going After The Associated Press’ Records
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022838537

Justice subpoenaed AP phone records, news service says
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022838649

Leahy: I Want To Hear DOJ’s Explanation For Collecting AP Phone Records
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022838804


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Smith v Maryland relev...