Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn the WTF were you thinking dept...'Be my slave' fashion shoot...no really...
?6?5
?5
News Flash: Slavery is not and will never be in vogue!
While most people don't need such an obvious reminder, this pointed message goes out to Aamna Aqeel. The Pakistani designer has found herself in the middle of a racially charged backlash thanks to her editorial shoot entitled Be My Slave."
In the spread, which is published in Diva magazine, a model is seen dressed in various Ageel designs while being catered to by a dark-skinned little boy who looks a lot like a slave. Our assumes can't be too far off considering the title of the story.
Since when did slavery become an appropriate marketing strategy? We're shocked--as should anyone who lays eyes on the images. And thankfully we're not alone.
The International Herald Tribune's Salima Feerasta felt the need to address the "vile images of racism and exploitation" and deemed the story "inexcusable." We couldn't agree more.
Feerasta spoke to Aqueel, who denied any intention of racism in the story. In fact, the designer's aim was to shed light on the issue of child labor. Aqueel said that the dark-skinned Baloch child was incidental. He works in a garage and wanted some work. As Feerasta so pointedly explains, Aqueel's reasoning doesn't add up and her message fails for many reasons.
While most people don't need such an obvious reminder, this pointed message goes out to Aamna Aqeel. The Pakistani designer has found herself in the middle of a racially charged backlash thanks to her editorial shoot entitled Be My Slave."
In the spread, which is published in Diva magazine, a model is seen dressed in various Ageel designs while being catered to by a dark-skinned little boy who looks a lot like a slave. Our assumes can't be too far off considering the title of the story.
Since when did slavery become an appropriate marketing strategy? We're shocked--as should anyone who lays eyes on the images. And thankfully we're not alone.
The International Herald Tribune's Salima Feerasta felt the need to address the "vile images of racism and exploitation" and deemed the story "inexcusable." We couldn't agree more.
Feerasta spoke to Aqueel, who denied any intention of racism in the story. In fact, the designer's aim was to shed light on the issue of child labor. Aqueel said that the dark-skinned Baloch child was incidental. He works in a garage and wanted some work. As Feerasta so pointedly explains, Aqueel's reasoning doesn't add up and her message fails for many reasons.
*snip*
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/13/aamna-aqeel-be-my-slave-shoot-fashion-racism-_n_3268648.html?ref=topbar
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 3056 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In the WTF were you thinking dept...'Be my slave' fashion shoot...no really... (Original Post)
one_voice
May 2013
OP
elleng
(130,865 posts)1. Not the first but maybe the WORST 'fashion shoot.'
morningfog
(18,115 posts)2. It is offensive and sometimes art is that.
I can see an argument that this beats you over the head with what other fashion images do with somewhat more subtly. There is a point and a message in there.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)3. Art can have a message
The message here is, 'This sucks.'
morningfog
(18,115 posts)4. I agree. I think it also says
much of how high fashion operates and exploits is not very far from this depiction.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)5. " In fact, the designer's aim was to shed light on the issue of child labor"
She failed utterly.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)6. whoa
Quantess
(27,630 posts)7. There may have been noble intentions.
The point may have been to be anti-slavery, anti-exploitation of dirt poor children. The art project TOTALLY FAILED if that was the point... instead the photos glamourize it.