General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAngelina Jolie Announces She Has Undergone Preventive Double Mastectomy
Angelina Jolie Announces She Has Undergone Preventive Double Mastectomy
In an op-ed piece to be published in Tuesdays New York Times, actress Angelina Jolie has announced that she recently completed a preventive double mastectomy. In the piece, the actress explains that the procedures have decreased her chances of getting breast cancer, from 87% to 5%, and that she feels empowered that I made a strong choice that in no way diminishes my femininity.
Jolie says she is sharing her experience now in hopes that other women can benefit from it.
-snip-
Full article here: http://www.mediaite.com/online/angelina-jolie-announces-she-has-undergone-preventive-double-mastectomy/
- - -
by Angelina Jolie
MY MOTHER fought cancer for almost a decade and died at 56. She held out long enough to meet the first of her grandchildren and to hold them in her arms. But my other children will never have the chance to know her and experience how loving and gracious she was.
We often speak of Mommys mommy, and I find myself trying to explain the illness that took her away from us. They have asked if the same could happen to me. I have always told them not to worry, but the truth is I carry a faulty gene, BRCA1, which sharply increases my risk of developing breast cancer and ovarian cancer.
My doctors estimated that I had an 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer, although the risk is different in the case of each woman.
Only a fraction of breast cancers result from an inherited gene mutation. Those with a defect in BRCA1 have a 65 percent risk of getting it, on average.
-snip-
Full OP-ed here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html?_r=1&
Cha
(297,154 posts)thanks Tx
MADem
(135,425 posts)She had a diagnosis, though, before she opted for that solution. IIRC she could have gone the lump removal route, but she wasn't taking any chances.
http://xfinity.comcast.net/slideshow/entertainment-breastcancersurvivors/8/
Abq_Sarah
(2,883 posts)And luckily, she has the resources available to make that choice.
If we had single-payer health care in the U.S., we'd all have the resources for this, should something like this be necessary.
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)I wish things were more advanced so that women wouldn't have to cut off their body parts in order to keep themselves from dying down the road.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)No escaping it.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)When medicine has improved to the point where there are safe, cheap, easy cures for things that are now difficult and unpleasant to tackle, it will also have discovered unpleasant and expensive ways to tackle new things; and so on as those cures improve.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)Does an average american woman's insurance cover such preventative treatment?
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)With no cancer present most insurance companies would call it elective.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)pokerfan
(27,677 posts)PZ Myers makes this observation...
The only glitch in this story is that this is America: if youre not a mega-millionaire movie star, youre not likely to be able to afford the expensive genetic testing, or the extensive surgeries. But maybe Jolies openness will encourage politicians to correct that, too.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/05/14/angeline-jolie-just-became-an-even-more-interesting-person/
applegrove
(118,622 posts)through life. Thank god this crop of Hollywood celebrities are so great at making the world a better more accepting place.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)wonderful of her to speak out
RudynJack
(1,044 posts)but I wouldn't wish that decision on anyone. I can't even imagine...
kiva
(4,373 posts)But the fact is that many (the majority?) of American women don't have the financial access to this sort of procedure.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)kiva
(4,373 posts)that identified her risk for cancer - $3000. That is truly a drop in the bucket compared to the cost of the surgery itself, not to mention reconstructive surgery (if she chose to have that, not sure based on the article), and I seriously doubt that many, if any, insurance companies would pay for this as a preventative measure.
Again, I'm not bashing her - I admire her for choosing this option, given her looks-based profession, and for writing about it - I am just stating that she is in a position to do this while the majority of women are not...which is a criticism of our health care system, not Ms. Jolie.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)In the past she has expressed an admiration for Ayn Rand and at one time was planning to produce and star in a film version of Atlas Shrugged. So I have to wonder how she envisions "improving access" - charity for a lucky few? Maybe she's changed; the article does not make that clear.
That said, I wouldn't wish this situation on anyone and I do hope her treatment will be a complete success, and that her biological daughters did not inherit the faulty gene. But mostly I wish that lower income women could have access to the great care she does.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Here is a quote form this very OPED.
" It has got to be a priority to ensure that more women can access gene testing and lifesaving preventive treatment, whatever their means and background, wherever they live. The cost of testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2, at more than $3,000 in the United States, remains an obstacle for many women."
Note whatever their means, and also 'wherever they live' which means the world, not just our own backyard. Note that she knows the price others would pay and understands that it is too high.
Her work on behalf of refugees around the world has been excellent, self funded (pays her own way for those slow on the uptake) and she lives in the same conditions as the UN humanitarian staff she is there to help. That means the millionaire lady sleeps in a tent in Africa for weeks on end.
Which of these things suggest a love of the 'lucky few'? Which suggests a Randian outlook?
She is one an excellent person who does more to help those in poverty and extreme duress than most people.
Take a look at her work, her associates, her words and come back to tell us she's John Galt in the chapter where Galt volunteers half his life to help the very poorest of the poor.
appacom
(296 posts)I am always amazed when people confuse the real Jolie with the rumored. Her political philosophy is as clear as a bell if you map the work she's doing around the world. She's truly a 21st Century Change Agent -
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)In less time than it took you to type that response, you could have Googled and gotten a boatload of hits on her longstanding admiration for Ayn Rand. And clearly, undertaking a major motion picture glorifying her hero's world view suggests more than a casual interest:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jan/28/books.film
And not only do I NOT admire her disaster tourism, I am largely disgusted by it. Celebrities posing for pictures with refugees never impresses me (it's what they do when cameras aren't clicking that does) - but her role as a useful idiot for the warhawks at the CFR is worthy of our contempt, IMO. Or did you miss the pro-war essay she wrote for them? I swear, people get so wrapped up in celebrity worship, they don't care what the truth is.
Her OPED takes no specific position, so it might as well say nothing.
chillfactor
(7,574 posts)the cancer was already there....i had a choice between a mastectomy or removal of the cancer and chemotherapy..I have seen what chemotherapy has done to others so I opted for the mastectomy..I have never been sorry.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)my cousin did the same thing. Her mother, most of her aunts and her grandmother all had breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer. Most died of it (including her mother). So, she decided to get tested (I'm pretty sure it was the BRCA1 gene.) It was positive. She did her research and eventually underwent a preventative double mastectomy and reconstruction. Since her own mother had ovarian cancer as well (she started out with on type of cancer in one breast...then another type in the other...then ovarian) I expect she'll eventually get that surgery as well, as she nears the age her own mother was first diagnosed. It may seem extreme to get so many 'parts' removed, but when you have small kids, going from an 87% chance of cancer to 5% chance is a no-brainer.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)ala:
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Giuliana Rancic had her breast tissue removed and the reconstructive surgery - I believe they are done at the same time.
Neoma
(10,039 posts)Basically, you can't really get a mammogram after doing that and the risk of a lump going unnoticed is pretty high.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)so there isn't anything left for a mammogram.
Response to HappyMe (Reply #30)
Neoma This message was self-deleted by its author.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)If I tested positive for this gene, I would opt to have it all removed. I wouldn't want to take the chance with any of the tissue left.
Neoma
(10,039 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)lymph node dissection, radiation treatments and any breast surgery can cause that.
Neoma
(10,039 posts)body. Besides that, you can get cancer on your lymph nodes. But I don't wish lymphadema on anybody.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)removed from under my left arm - lymphoma.
Neoma
(10,039 posts)I've seen lymphadema go both ways I guess. No need for a sleeve in the day, in good health... Or in bad health, need for a sleeve and glove for all day every day and a compression cast to wear every night. Along with the inability to go into high altitudes.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)So, mammograms aren't the only option any longer.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)If you have smaller breasts, I don't think they would be able to get mushed into the mammogram machine.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Any other woman could pretty much kiss her acting career goodbye.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)A tragic twist. To have the world's most admired breasts and have to give them up. Goddamn cancer, what a plague it is.
Everything I read about her makes me admire her more. She and Brad are nothing like the aloof elites you read about. That article made me sad.
Good luck, Angie!
PDittie
(8,322 posts)That's the title of a book a person I know wrote recently about her own experience.
http://www.amyshealth.com/killer-boobs-now-available-1569
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)found this piece very helpful and comforting. K&R.
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)Am I correct that there was no cancer to be found? If so then I think she did the wrong thing. While I'd agree that it might be the right decision when the first indication of a tumor being present was found I don't think I'd do it preemptively.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)and her mother died in her early 50's after fighting cancer for 10 years. Jolie didn't want to put her 6 children through any grief.
I can understand why she did it.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Angelina Jolie Pitt: Diary of a Surgery
By ANGELINA JOLIE PITT
MARCH 24, 2015
...It is not easy to make these decisions. But it is possible to take control and tackle head-on any health issue. You can seek advice, learn about the options and make choices that are right for you. Knowledge is power.
Angelina Jolie Pitt is a filmmaker and special envoy of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.