Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow SCOTUS Could Make Breast Cancer Gene Testing More Affordable
Angelina Jolie's Breast Cancer-Preventing Move May Be Too Costly For Most Women
Towards the end of her widely read New York Times op-ed detailing her decision to get a preventative double mastectomy and lower her risk of breast cancer, Angelina Jolie noted something significant: Many American women can't afford to take the genetic test for the breast cancer gene. At $3,000, Jolie writes, the cost of testing "remains an obstacle for many women."
The 37-year-old actress does not mention why that test is so expensive. The primary reason: A Salt Lake City, Utah-based biotech company called Myriad Genetics holds a patent on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The companys main product, BRACAnalysis, tests for a mutation in those genes that comes with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Myriads patent on the genes is being challenged in the Supreme Court by organizations that claim the companys patent is hampering scientific research. In addition, the patent essentially gives the company a monopoly on the tests, meaning patients have nowhere else to go for a second opinion.
-snip-
Full article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/angelina-jolie-breast-cancer_n_3273594.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 614 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How SCOTUS Could Make Breast Cancer Gene Testing More Affordable (Original Post)
Tx4obama
May 2013
OP
Tarheel_Dem
(31,228 posts)1. I'm glad to hear that Jolie recognizes this is a cost prohibitive procedure for many women. I.....
think she's a good caring soul, unlike her asshole father.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)2. Same here
I'm hope that conversation gets more publicity once the outrage over her choice to have her breasts removed dies down.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,228 posts)3. Exactly. I'd like to think if I were told I had an 87% chance of developing breast cancer, that....
I could be brave enough to make this choice, and every woman should be in a position to do so, and not have to worry about cost. We can't even get people to rationally discuss the lifesaving benefits of Planned Parenthood, and I don't expect this debate to be any different, even when "the outrage dies down". Let's face it, some people get off on being constantly "outraged" about something. Anything.