Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
Fri May 17, 2013, 02:21 PM May 2013

The big question in the Benghazi Scandal is now . . .

Last edited Fri May 17, 2013, 04:12 PM - Edit history (1)

What did Darrell Issa know and when did he know it?

Or, perhaps we can substitute John Boehner for Issa's name.

In any case, Republicans have once again been caught constructing a false story, not to cover up an embarrassing event or criminal intent, but simply to create a false narrative in order to exaggerate the administration's culpability. This ranks up there with burglarizing the headquarters of the loyal opposition, selling arms to hostile nation behind the backs of Congress and the public and leading the nation to war based on a pack of lies as the worst incidents of government malfeasance I can recall.

For the benefit of lurking right wing morons, an incident where the President gets a blow job from an intern in the Oval Office is deliberately omitted. One may find it tacky or disgusting (after all, I did), but it doesn't rise to the level of government malfeasance.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The big question in the Benghazi Scandal is now . . . (Original Post) Jack Rabbit May 2013 OP
The really sad, or scary thing is Andy823 May 2013 #1
Working, here, to defend my objectivity, but it's an unavoidable truth: Republicans ARE bad. patrice May 2013 #2
And inherently dishonest, PatSeg May 2013 #11
Being stupid doesn't necessarily equal a moral handicap, but self-congratulatory stupidity, e.g. ... patrice May 2013 #13
I can't decide which is worse, PatSeg May 2013 #17
Power is an addiction, leads to facism and blasphemy. nt patrice May 2013 #24
I agree PatSeg May 2013 #29
They are pustules sheshe2 May 2013 #32
I agree; it's pathology of several different kinds, whole spectrums of pathology. Scarey. nt patrice May 2013 #34
Speaker Boner ... napkinz May 2013 #3
Oh my goodness, the choices that surface at the thought... Frustratedlady May 2013 #4
And wasting tax payer money to chase a concocted story down a rabbit hole bushisanidiot May 2013 #5
and let's not forget this about Issa ... napkinz May 2013 #6
IS "worth" appx. $743. million. nt patrice May 2013 #14
He is worth less than my piss... Moostache May 2013 #20
Now, THAT's! commitment! patrice May 2013 #23
I'd join you in a toast... Auntie Bush May 2013 #26
investigate Issa! napkinz May 2013 #28
& also how many generations of these tax exempt entities, whole family trees of these networks, are patrice May 2013 #30
K & R Scurrilous May 2013 #7
My concern is that the media is not going to dig much into this issue. They've been baselessly WIProgressive88 May 2013 #8
Of course they won't report that they lied. Boomerproud May 2013 #10
Yep! even though that information directly serves one of their putative values: high Natnl Security patrice May 2013 #15
Wonder if the FNC audience forced this. Didn't work for the election but the audience was primed SleeplessinSoCal May 2013 #9
AND a moderate favorite, Susan Rice, a friend of Hillary's, is still IN the Mix, to boot! nt patrice May 2013 #16
Issa madokie May 2013 #12
Or, "Who's going to jail?" sinkingfeeling May 2013 #18
Well, THEY did say it was like EC May 2013 #19
they don't all lurk. n/t Whisp May 2013 #21
+1 graham4anything May 2013 #27
I'm just a groundling at this play. While I have never seen this play before.... Junkdrawer May 2013 #22
KICK patrice May 2013 #25
Rachel Maddow's top story right now on MSNBC! napkinz May 2013 #31
Excellent, sheshe2 May 2013 #33
kick napkinz May 2013 #35
the media is not asking this question. they are complicit in the fucking over of democrats spanone May 2013 #36
Rachel is the only one to cover the REAL scandal napkinz May 2013 #37

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
1. The really sad, or scary thing is
Fri May 17, 2013, 02:32 PM
May 2013

The right wing crazy wacko base will "NEVER" see the truth, they will eat up all the lying crap the republicans can come up with and continue to put these same lying bastards back in office, year after year after year!

It's hard to imagine anyone being so down right gullible as to not see what is really going on. I guess low informed people are all the right has these days!

patrice

(47,992 posts)
2. Working, here, to defend my objectivity, but it's an unavoidable truth: Republicans ARE bad.
Fri May 17, 2013, 02:32 PM
May 2013

I wish we could do a spreadsheet, pluses and minuses, all of them, or as many as possible anyway; I'm thinking there would be NO balance whatsoever in the effect of Republicans upon other people. They are obsolete, extinct, and limited in their human insights by their own prejudices, so they are desperate and, hence, blindly destroying whatever they can.

Republicans may not connsciously intend to be bad, but the facts about them add up to HARM, even DEATH, to others in service to their blind drive to power which it is inevitable that they will abuse, un-necessarily abuse, way more than Democrats can/will/do.

PatSeg

(47,260 posts)
11. And inherently dishonest,
Fri May 17, 2013, 04:15 PM
May 2013

sometimes even criminal.

There used to be reasonable, sane, honest republicans. I rarely agreed with them on policy, but they weren't offensive and destructive. Now they are predominately as you said "bad". The sane ones usually switch parties or retire in disgust.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
13. Being stupid doesn't necessarily equal a moral handicap, but self-congratulatory stupidity, e.g. ...
Fri May 17, 2013, 04:24 PM
May 2013

some obvious examples many of us can think of, in association with the handicap of assumed moral superiority, I'm sorry to say, is to all practical intents and purposes, evil.

Blasphemers are either sick or DANGEROUSLY stupid/ignorant.

PatSeg

(47,260 posts)
17. I can't decide which is worse,
Fri May 17, 2013, 04:40 PM
May 2013

the morally superior stupid people (Gohmert, Inhofe, Barton, Bachmann) or the dishonest, but smart ones who play on the stupidity and ignorance of their constituents (Cruz, Issa, Rick Scott). I can't recall a time when there so many dangerous people in positions of power before.

PatSeg

(47,260 posts)
29. I agree
Fri May 17, 2013, 07:00 PM
May 2013

I think there are people who initially went into politics to make a difference, but become seduced by the power and importance that comes with the office.

There are a few that I can't imagine being hired to do much of anything. What kind of job would someone like Louis Gohmert or Virginia Foxx be qualified for? Its either Congress or FOX News.

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
4. Oh my goodness, the choices that surface at the thought...
Fri May 17, 2013, 02:43 PM
May 2013

McConnell
Cruz
Goemert
Cantor
Foxx
Bachmann

plus,
Rove
Rush
Beck
Palin
and, we can't forget the puppetmaster behind the screen...Cheney

bushisanidiot

(8,064 posts)
5. And wasting tax payer money to chase a concocted story down a rabbit hole
Fri May 17, 2013, 02:46 PM
May 2013

someone should be demanding Issa's immediate resignation!

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
20. He is worth less than my piss...
Fri May 17, 2013, 05:26 PM
May 2013

Which I would rather drink than use to extinguish him if he were on fire.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
30. & also how many generations of these tax exempt entities, whole family trees of these networks, are
Fri May 17, 2013, 07:49 PM
May 2013

there out there?

1959 was kind of a long time a go. There have been many changes, but this particular type of BUSINESS entity has been around for quite a while, so we're probably looking at least at 3rd or 4th generation of same, thanks to generations of well funded Republican operatives.

WIProgressive88

(314 posts)
8. My concern is that the media is not going to dig much into this issue. They've been baselessly
Fri May 17, 2013, 03:30 PM
May 2013

pushing the "Obama is the new Nixon" meme for the last week or so; they're so invested in that narrative at this point it doesn't seem to me that they will want to focus on information that counters it.

Boomerproud

(7,940 posts)
10. Of course they won't report that they lied.
Fri May 17, 2013, 03:52 PM
May 2013

The media NEVER admits that they are swimming in their corporate masters money.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
15. Yep! even though that information directly serves one of their putative values: high Natnl Security
Fri May 17, 2013, 04:29 PM
May 2013

Last edited Fri May 17, 2013, 06:02 PM - Edit history (1)

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,082 posts)
9. Wonder if the FNC audience forced this. Didn't work for the election but the audience was primed
Fri May 17, 2013, 03:48 PM
May 2013

I know Ailes and Co. thought dredging this up would be a good weapon to wield at H.Clinton, but the White House kept in reserve their proof and now the audience that lap up FNC's every loony word is slapping them all in the face.

EC

(12,287 posts)
19. Well, THEY did say it was like
Fri May 17, 2013, 05:20 PM
May 2013

Watergate and Iran-Contra...actually they said it was worse, so I suspect they've got other surprises they put together too.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
22. I'm just a groundling at this play. While I have never seen this play before....
Fri May 17, 2013, 05:33 PM
May 2013

I've been to this theater many times. If you watch over in that corner, people appear from under the stage as if by magic.

Translation:

Republicans try to swing elections with nefarious interferences in foreign affairs, Democrats expose the misdeeds closer to the next election cycle.

And so it goes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The big question in the B...