Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat May 18, 2013, 07:07 PM May 2013

‘Doctored’ Benghazi e-mails rankle Dem lawmaker

‘Doctored’ Benghazi e-mails rankle Dem lawmaker

By Erik Wemple

<...>

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) today asked for an accounting as to how “doctored” e-mails relating to the Obama administration’s deliberations on Benghazi wound up in the hands of the media...Schiff was irked that prior to the e-mails’ release, news reports inaccurately portrayed key bits of correspondence, and he specifically cited ABC News in a chat with the Erik Wemple Blog today. On May 10, ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl issued an explosive story chronicling the evolution of the administration’s talking points...Though ABC News and Weekly Standard didn’t give extensive details on their sourcing for the stories, Schiff says it’s not hard to reverse-engineer them: “I don’t know precisely who doctored and leaked the e-mails but plainly it didn’t come from administration, and it wouldn’t have come from Democratic staffers,” Schiff said. Earlier this week, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney accused “Republicans” of “fabricating” e-mails in an effort to embarrass the Obama administration.

At a moment when everyone is talking about leaks and investigations, Schiff has more for the pile: “A GOP leak of doctored e-mails (became) the basis of GOP talking points,” said Schiff. “That’s a pretty disturbing irony considering the investigation was supposed to be about spin on talking points.”

In his quest for accountability, Schiff singles out Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. A reliable critic of the White House, Issa recently welcomed a trio of Benghazi whistleblowers to testify before his committee and vows to continue looking into the controversy. “Congressman Issa owes the public an answer as to who doctored these emails, who leaked them to the press, and who is being held accountable,” said the statement.

Why Issa? That’s the question of his spokesman, Frederick Hill, who e-mailed this note today: “The Oversight Committee did not view the talking point e-mails until they were publicly released on Wednesday. They were not made available to our committee prior to that. Schiff should check his facts and stop playing politics to the detriment of Benghazi victims’ families who are still seeking answers.”

- more -

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2013/05/18/doctored-benghazi-e-mails-rankle-dem-lawmaker/

There you have it: Who made the doctored e-mail available to Issa's oversight committee?

Another question: Why were Republicans, including Issa, who should have known the emails were doctored relying on fake email to support their investigation?

Wow, This is Pretty Epic (Republicans manufactured evidence on Benghazi)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022857236
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
3. The statement by
Sat May 18, 2013, 07:15 PM
May 2013

"if this doesn't get traction......"

...Issa's spokesman needs to be looked at carefully:

Why Issa? That’s the question of his spokesman, Frederick Hill, who e-mailed this note today: “The Oversight Committee did not view the talking point e-mails until they were publicly released on Wednesday. They were not made available to our committee prior to that. Schiff should check his facts and stop playing politics to the detriment of Benghazi victims’ families who are still seeking answers.”

The denial they saw the e-mail before hand and the admission that it was presented as evidence in the investigation.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. The media was complicit. The GOP holds majority in the house. So that's what we get...
Sat May 18, 2013, 07:55 PM
May 2013

If we get the house back in 2014, the shit will hit the fan. If not, they get aways with it - and will find one thing after another all the way through 2016. Numbers is the way it's done.

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
8. From Frederick Hill
Sat May 18, 2013, 09:23 PM
May 2013
Schiff should check his facts and stop playing politics to the detriment of Benghazi victims’ families who are still seeking answers.”


Really Fred..what you and your party are doing with this witch hunt is NOT Detrimental to the Victims and their families?
The party of ugly is beneath contempt!


Great post, ProSense!

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
9. And, when you're "rankled", you write a strongly worded letter
Sat May 18, 2013, 09:25 PM
May 2013

to Speaker Boehner and that's it, right?

magellan

(13,257 posts)
10. If this had happened under Bush**, Repubs would be investigating to find the leaker!!
Sat May 18, 2013, 09:46 PM
May 2013

But because it's a Dem president, nada.

I hope Schiff is "rankled" and "irked" enough to raise a good stink over this and demand an investigation into who leaked the doctored emails to ABC. But I doubt that would happen even if Dems had a majority in the House.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
11. Go Adam Schiff.. just remember Issa and his Freddy Hill wil lie about this
Sun May 19, 2013, 12:32 AM
May 2013

until there's no more breath to lie.

“Congressman Issa owes the public an answer as to who doctored these emails, who leaked them to the press, and who is being held accountable,” said the statement.

thanks ProSense

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
13. I wonder if ABC will apologize for being a mouthpiece for the GOP?
Sun May 19, 2013, 01:09 PM
May 2013

I keeeed! Of COURSE they will not! Why bite the hand that feeds you!

 

Life Long Dem

(8,582 posts)
14. And so wrong on so many levels.
Sun May 19, 2013, 03:25 PM
May 2013
“That’s a pretty disturbing irony considering the investigation was supposed to be about spin on talking points.”


Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
16. Let's see if the rethugs hold hearings about these faked emails
Mon May 20, 2013, 09:16 PM
May 2013

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to happen

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»‘Doctored’ Benghazi e-mai...