General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThat's just wrong to look so effortlessly relaxed, happy & handsome
11:0 AM EDT: President Obama Speaks at Morehouse College Commencement Ceremony, Atlanta, Georgia
TheObamaDiary.com @TheObamaDiary 8m
Breaking from @JonKarl: Visibly stressed and deflated Obama attends Morehouse Commencement: pic.twitter.com/nlquk7t8Pb
ForUS50 @FORUS50 8m
@TheObamaDiary That's just wrong to look so effortlessly relaxed, happy & handsome. It kills the soulless RWNJs who try to take him down.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)You cannot rattle Obama.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)the impression that even folks "on our own side" want him to be more animated, even though that isn't what passes legislation, it's a style thingy. Because he's so cool headed, the slightest bit of emotion tends to set the media all atwitter about some perceived "angry" response.
I think his Hawaiian upbringing has a lot to do with his overall disposition, and I think there's a name for it, but I admit, I don't know it.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)I also think he had to be adaptable with the traveling his mother did. And, i recently read that there was a lot of conflict between his grandparents. That probably explains his aversion to it.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)He wants to be an adult. He, clearly, wants to govern, but sadly that isn't left up to only him. He has to have partners in governing, which is why the midterms are crucial.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)is the biography of his mother. It puts a lot of what we see in context. An interesting thing about Obama is that with what he has written himself, there should be very little mystery about who he is and how he operates. The biography of his mother gives even more relevant context.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)PatSeg
(47,418 posts)It drives them nuts that someone can be smart, handsome, funny, cool, and VERY likable. The more together he is, the more they want to tear him down. He is everything they aren't and they just aren't going to let him get away with it!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)"don't hate me cuz I'm beautiful".
PatSeg
(47,418 posts)can produce some very hateful, destructive people. Maybe more therapy and less politics would serve them better!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)I'm sure that is chapping some rethuglicon asses too
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)And for all his mistakes and faults, Obama does feel selfless love for others.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Dumbass, this is a public forum...Did you forget your secret oath?
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I didn't say that project badger nads starts tomorrow at 8am Eastern!
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)The badger has been neutered. I repeat, the badger has been neutered. Adjust your actions accordingly.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)to believe so many people can hate him so much and say the things they say about our President.
We Dems couldn't stand Bush...but we never used such hostile vitriol toward him...though he deserved it.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Last edited Sun May 19, 2013, 05:27 PM - Edit history (1)
live miserable and die alone with their gold!
They are fucking up what should be a renaissance in America!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Take a look at the videos of the commencement address posted by Cha. He tells how MLK, Jr. was influenced by his years there, and he brought tears to some of the students, and myself as well. Those who can't give this man a chance are missing out on something good.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11029943
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)for passing last week's exams!
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)bigtree
(85,991 posts). . . I'd sure like to see you try, though, and I don't mean from behind a computer screen.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)As it happens, what I wrote is correct. You simply do not want to consider it.
Obama has embraced the Neoconservative position on war and defense, drone terrorism, patriot and other constitutional abuses, his assault on 'whistleblowers', healthcare, the environment, the transcanada pipeline, the gulf spill, corporatism, and even social security. I think you would be hard pressed to find any significant policy difference between Obama and classic neoconservatism. The only real and meaningful differences between Obama and Bush is that Obama is freaking brilliant, and he's not in bed with social conservatives. But Neoconservative? Absolutely.
But he sure is one handsome guy.
Squeeeee!
patrice
(47,992 posts)SIMPLE -minded.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)As this one is about how handsome and dreamy our President is. I will leave you to it.
patrice
(47,992 posts)Touché!
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)-p
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)bigtree
(85,991 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)direction? I'm not saying your characterization is true, not at all. But, seeing how he just won re-election with a +5 mil vote surplus, I'd say the voting public disagrees with you vehemently, as do I.
I know that the Naderites and other assorted third party advocates here are given to fits of hyperbole, but I just interpret that as a sure sign of impotence, and a certain lack of self awareness on their part.
patrice
(47,992 posts)This very specifically negatively colored reaction to ALL things as "Obama's fault . . ." suggests an inherent warp of somekind, something that most of us possess, but the difference is in our commitments to rational empiricism, which for some of us compels us to admit our own biases and limitations in our truths . . .
a trait that is missing from something that like to imply that it is "the Left" , but, otherwise, displays some rather distinctly fascistic tendencies on this board.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Was more a rejection of GOP Social Conservatism (which has come to dominate the GOP since the advent of the Teamparty movement) than an embrace of Neoconservatism. Further, consider that Obama ran largely on the suggestion that this time he would be free from reelection concerns and could finally go to battle for the left. This was certainly a subtext. He damn sure didn't campaign on the idea of more wars, permanent tax cuts for the wealthy, destroying social security, and adding more corporate insiders to the inner circle.
So no, overall I do not believe the country is more neoconservative. I think the DNC is.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)He got elected the first time on the promise that he would get us out of Iraq, and double down in Afghanistan, and it sure as hell didn't hurt his reelection, and that chaps your ass, don't it? Oh, and weren't taxes raised shortly after the election?
As for all your other claptrap, it's just liberal claptrap, or someone trying awfully hard to appear that way on the internet.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Winner winner chicken dinner.
See: caricature
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)being criticized on this political forum for stating my views.
Obama wants to move forward. The neo-conservative policies and the policies that move in that direction want to move backwards or stand still.
I was never a Naderite or a third party advocate, but I believe in challenging the ideas of today and seeking the ideas that will build a better tomorrow.
Some of us have to lead the movement forward. I am willing to do that.
I think that forward-thinking, maybe even thinking ahead of your time are signs of confidence, of independence and self-awareness.
You are entitled to your opinion. A person is entitled to limit his thoughts to the possible and the convenient. But I consider myself, as a person with a lot of experience and education and a lot of friends, to have a responsibility to present ideas that have promise.
I do not believe that there is anything admirable about stagnating in the dogmas and fears of the past.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)liberal policies, but when asked they choose not to identify themselves as such. The big problem for liberals is the face of liberalism tends to be people like Ralph Nader, Michael Moore, and Dennis Kucinich, and I'm not just talking about physical features. It's much more than that. Otherwise, we'd see many more liberals in Congress, and maybe one that actually had a shot at the White House.
There's a deep distaste, even among Democrats for those who seem radical in their rhetoric, and in their views. Purist liberals can blame the DNC, the DLC, or whomever they choose. But, I think a certain introspection is called for, and they seem to be wholly unwilling to do that.
Lastly, let me say that the Democratic Party will never be overtaken by the kind of idiocy we see with the GOP and their more radical element known as the Tea Party. We'll win some, and we'll lose some, but as Democrats, we will largely support the person we nominated, and ultimately send to the White House. People who are loathe to do that, should just go do their own thing like Jill Stein & Rocky Anderson & Roseanne Barr, et al did, and good luck with that.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Two "Democrats" are running in my district. One is supported by corporate money and the machine. The other has lots of experience serving our community, knows our community and is loved by many -- but has less money.
We shall see who wins. It will be a close election.
Interestingly, the corporations providing the most support to the corporate-money-candidate have in many cases, as I view it, specific issues under consideration by the city council. That is the kind of neo-conservatism that will backfire on Democrats. It isn't politics. It's corruption, plain and simple, but hard to prove.
At the national level, the failure of the Obama administration to be proactive in breaking up the big banks is an utter scandal. Sorry. I don't think you will find very many Americans who would support the inaction of the Obama administration with regard to cleaning up banking practices if they understood the economic and legal issues involved.
Also, when it comes to the chained CPI and cuts to programs like Social Security and veterans' benefits, the American people disagree with Obama's budget which panders to a very small group of powerful, wealthy and very greedy individuals. Obama has made a huge mistake in supporting the chained CPI. The chained CPI as applied to Social Security transforms what was passed as a progressive tax into a regressive one. It cannibalizes the money seniors paid into the Social Security Trust Fund, digests them in the general fund and then regurgitates to the detriment of those who paid the taxes in the first place. For shame.
On the other hand, the Benghazi, IRS and AP scandals are fabrications. Just Republicans pulling the wool over naive Fox News viewers. And I support Obama's ACA wholeheartedly although I would prefer single payer. On health care, Obama took on a difficult issue and held steady.
In addition, I think very highly of Obama as a person. I do not expect to get my way all the time, but on DU, a website for political discussion, I think we should be free to express dissident positions as long as we do not lower ourselves to ad hominem posts intended to intimidate other DUers into agreeing with us 100%.
I call it like it is. I am a loyal, very active Democrat. But I believe my party is best served and Obama is best served when I say what I think, what I believe.
I see how Obama's expression of his views on the rights of gays and lesbians changed as he served in office and had to confront the obvious moral and legal contradictions in depriving citizens of their equal rights.
Had no one expressed ideas that are new and that diverged from the status quo, Obama might not have dared to "come out" in favor of gays and lesbians.
DU is a place to express and discuss ideas. Let's allow others their freedom to consider real change in our society.
Thanks.
patrice
(47,992 posts)dead give-away.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Just because Chris doesn't swoon as much as you guys doesn't mean he's wrong in his observations. What a bunch of fan-natics.
-p
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)A fellow Dem voicing an opinion.
How utterly observant you are.
Yea, let's not wait for the "R's" we can divide and Conquer ourselves!
I can hear it already, "If your not with us, your against us". That's seems to be the level critical thinking I'm dealing with here.
-p
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Yup! You and Chris would know all about that now, wouldn't ya? Keep up the work!
It's like talking to a Republican.
I have no patience for willful ignorance.
-p
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)I just followed. But nice try, pretending to be above it all.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)But nice try, pretending to be above it all.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)for someone who needs schooling.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)You've gone from calling for unity among the left, to namecalling in one fell swoop. I think I'll take my "schooling" from someone much more qualified than someone called "Phlem", if you don't mind.
Well I guess you got me.
-p
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)seen the word "if" deleted also, and the word "only" added by posters with a similar inclination to mischaracterize what others are saying.
. . . your 'truth' would be immediately and effectively challenged with a quite different perspective.
In fact, your complaints aren't the sole purview of a progressive argument; but can also be found in conservatives' diatribes regarding this presidency (see: republican attempts to repeal Obamacare). You also look to be attributing congressional initiatives and actions in your litany of complaints. You're not going to find many at Morehouse who are willing to paint his presidency with such a broad and contradictory brush of criticisms. That's what I think you'd find folks with the 'courage' to respond with there.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Noam Chomsky? That list is inane and as long as you're here you might as well know that those two are notorious liars. Starting with war and defense: if Obama was anything close to a neocon we'd be up to our eyeballs in Iran, Syria and probably Yemen and Somalia. In blood. Have you been asleep for the last four years or what?
were anything close to a neocon, the Koch Brothers and Karl Rove wouldn't have spent so much money to defeat him this past election. But some of the self-appointed standard-bearers of the Left don't exactly see it that way.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)And it wouldn't surprise me if a more than a few "truth-tellers" were in the Koch brothers' pockets. Greenwald for example we know is because he's attached to the CATO institute which is a Koch PR shop. Glenn earning his pay at CATO, Feb. 2012:
http://www.cato.org/multimedia/cato-video/glenn-greenwald-catos-ending-global-war-drugs-conference
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)and what they are referring to by means of those words, such as "charismatic neoconservative", are NOT the same thing. If you deny this fact, then you deny that you are ignorant of a great deal of what one would have to know in order to validly posit such an equation between your words and ANY human being. One doing that denies their own ignorance and, hence, diminishes the experiences of those HUMANS, about whom you are ignorant, to the deminutive and, through your own slavish assumptions, discount the meanings of people's lives in any terms but your own.
This is why I say, "meet the 'new' boss, same BOSS as the old boss," because that level of authentic revolutionary critique does not exist, at least on this board.
Response to Demo_Chris (Reply #6)
Post removed
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)on behalf of this administration really is.
Let even one person put an accurate label on the policies of this administration.....
Let even one person ripple the aura of radiance being crafted here...
and the ugly, swarming personal attacks begin.
We are living in very creepy times.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)disposition to robots that walk around with blinders on.
-p
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I just came from another thread where all his misdeeds and hypocrisy seemed to disappear completely from existence and he's treated like he walks on water. I've seen this in the Republican voting base and It Is creepy to see it happening here.
word.
-p
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)to tell each other how much they love and iodize the president, then I would think they would post this in their "group" which is especially for that purpose. But I am guessing that gets old and they want more.
Marr
(20,317 posts)discussed without making the Leaders look bad. Yes, when there's a Republican in the White House, the same people will drone on about how we have to vote for another Obama so he can fight all the policies of the Republican president, who is continuing the policies of Obama.
boilerbabe
(2,214 posts)perhaps they should post this fawning stuff in the BOG where opinions are limited. i believe this is intentional shit stirring.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)That's both a very clever and self-congratulatory way to minimize and trivialize the opinions of others. Well done.
And you get the obligatory Orwell implication added in too.
Very clever indeed...
forestpath
(3,102 posts)Isoldeblue
(1,135 posts)Name me one conservative that would bring us universal health care, as he has.
Name me one neocon that would raise taxes on higher incomes, like PBO did.
Name any conservatives that would not have hundreds of boots on the ground more than we do now, or wouldn't have us engaged in heavy-duty war, w/independent contractors making bucko-bucks, like Haliburton on top of our boys there?
I'm not hearing any neo-cons say education is a priority. Instead, they are calling us snobs for wanting our system bettered.
And let's not overlook how PBO has taken a strong lead in gun reform. That sure doesn't jibe with any rethug's I've heard from on the subject.
Just because a very few policies are similar to the right, it's still a stretch to say that about him. Except for the charismatic part, which just come's natural to him.
I don't know what your definition is of a conservative, but in reality, President Obama has an long way to go, to earn that label. The cons of today are destroying this country and have no other goal but to bring PBO down, at our cost. How ungawdly, unpatriotic, can they get?!?
Demo-Chris, you should get your mouth washed out with soap...........
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Right after he reads a newspaper to find out taxes went up on the 1%. He's so invested in his talking points from 2010, he didn't realize there had been an election, we're out of Iraq, leaving Afghanistan, and getting health care for 40 mil new enrollees. He really needs to update that crap, so he can at least sound minimally informed.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)discussion with the resident tinfoilers.
Their "truth" is righteous and the rest of us are just unwitting pawns.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)That's news to me. Last I checked, this ain't Sweden we're living in. UhMerican health care is just as for-profit, counterproductive and Giant Insurance Conglomerate-friendly as ever.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)I've heard some on this forum saying that Obama is actually further right than Reagan. I'm not kidding--the same Reagan who created the Welfare Queen myth and trickle-down economics.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)You know where they're really from.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)It's not just RWNJ's
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Every time I see him with his wife, I smile from ear to ear. I'm jealous as all hell--after 2 divorces I know I'll never have that with anyone. I'm so happy when I see couples that have that magical quality.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)I love the whole family of them. We are fortunate to have them on our side.
The idiot belly achin' whiners and their hate for him and yet call themselves progressive or whatever, can go to freaking hell. Some of them sound as whacked out and crazy as any teabaggin' fleabag out there.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Im sick of hearing it. No the man isn't perfect. Yes I feel anxiety about Gitmo and drones. But I'm much happier continuing to hear "President Obama" than "President Romney". But even with the naysayers on our side, the Rethugs are disgusting about him. Actually they're just plain disgusting.
What really grinds my gears is how they go after Michelle, calling her "Marie Antoinette". Those same people were gushing about Ann "I love you womeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen" Romney with her Olympic horsey, multiple cars and a singular hate for "you people".
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)the wingnuts call Michelle "Marie Antoinette". I don't even get why they're hating on her, too--all she is is a first lady, not the president.
Isoldeblue
(1,135 posts)as their first lady, speaks volumes of the neo-con mentality..........
That's all I gotta say.
sheshe2
(83,746 posts)First Lady Michelle Obama Recipient of The Health Advocate Achievement Award
http://www.operationfitness.com/first-lady-michelle-obama-recipient-of-the-health-advocate-achievement-award/
As First Lady she also supports military families, helps working women balance their careers and families, encourages national service, promotes the arts and arts education, and fosters healthy eating and healthy living for children and families across the country. Additionally, she has earned widespread publicity on the topic of healthy eating by planting the first White House vegetable garden since Eleanor Roosevelt served as First Lady.
http://libguides.library.ncat.edu/content.php?pid=321603&sid=2643801
Does, childhood obesity, a call to national service, helping working women and supporting military families interest you at all? IMHO it does not.
Why do you dislike The First Lady so much? You obviously do not know what she has accomplished.
Disagree with the President's policies if you will, you won't give him credit for anything anyway. Calling the First Lady a teenage cheer leader is low. It is something we expect from Fox Snooze, not DU!
And that is all I have to say!
Isoldeblue
(1,135 posts)the very saccharine, Ann Romney! Not Michell Obama! I adore and admire her, sheshe!! I was responding to Dorkzilla's comment, adding to it.
Everything you said about Michelle, I know and totally agree with.
Isoldeblue
(1,135 posts)This is how I feel about President Obama..... http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2868436|
sheshe2
(83,746 posts)So sorry. sheshe
Isoldeblue
(1,135 posts)Just hope you realize I didn't mean Michelle was a teen-age cheerleader, like I think Ann is.
dorkzilla.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)They're adorable, and what makes it even more sweet is that they struggled in their marriage for a time and were able to overcome it and make their marriage stronger. Their affection for each other, their mutual respect and love comes from a place that has known sorrow right alongside the joy. Plus I love that they both came from nothing and achieved so much together.
Yes, I am a gushing fan of the Obamas!
Thanks, she she
sheshe2
(83,746 posts)I love to see such love and joy in the White House.
Sooo much better than the Stepford wife and the clown she married!
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)Either is Obama and I think we all see that.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)In the real world, apparently, people aren't paying as much attention as the president's detractors would like. This is inside the beltway, political junkie stuff that workaday people just don't have time for.
patrice
(47,992 posts)mom and dad, and grandma and grandpa were here to see this.
madokie
(51,076 posts)There would be some very very proud, parents and grandparents
Ishoutandscream2
(6,661 posts)I would be challenging some of these right wing assholes to "let's take it outside."
sad-cafe
(1,277 posts)a great man
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)sheshe2
(83,746 posts)He's saying bring it on.
They can huff and puff all they want however~
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)And you and Cha and others have given me so many. Thank you!
Skittles
(153,150 posts)his ears are very endearing
Cha
(297,160 posts)"visibly distressed and shaken" today. But, I won't post his pic and ruin this thread. rofl
And, gave an Awesome Address..
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1102&pid=9965
Mahalo bigtree!
kentuck
(111,081 posts)...of a politician...any politician.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)contributed to this conversation really give a crap about what you're "comfortable with".
kentuck
(111,081 posts)...and I don't consent. I'm just not into idolatry. Sorry.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)kentuck
(111,081 posts)You got tea leaves??
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Nope, but I'll bet you got plenty. "Tea" leaves.
Response to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #139)
Post removed
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)of folks like you. I will always be a Democrat. I will never entertain any 3rd party loser bullshit. The only danger you pose is, perhaps, chipping a nail on your keyboard as you type insults about supporters of the president and the Democratic Party. But hey, different strokes for different folks.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)Nobody does. That's the burr under your saddle!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Uzair
(241 posts)I've been told that that's a no-no. That would be making a statement about his physical appearance, and that's wrong, or something...
bigtree
(85,991 posts). . . all important and useful traits which translate into political action in his very public-oriented job.
Bucky
(53,998 posts)platitudes=wisdom
Definition of PLATITUDE
1
: the quality or state of being dull or insipid
2
: a banal, trite, or stale remark
Number23
(24,544 posts)And he met granny across the road at Spelman.
Number23
(24,544 posts)olivelove
(43 posts)Obama should be more like Kim Jun Un.
FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)He said...(paraphrasing)....
Some of you are graduating Cum Laude
Some of you are graduating Magna Cum Laude
and some of you are graduating thank-um theLaudie!
LOL!
hue
(4,949 posts)SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)at least in the eyes of millions of people who never bothered to think about what could have been...what should have been
To those people he (and truthfully, ANY democrat) is just a place-holder until a "rightfully eligible" republican can again take the reins of power.
Media has managed to convince enough people that republican leadership is the default position, and any deviation from it is only worthwhile as long as it takes to re-fill the government coffers.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Get some.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)how did one of you fans put it........ ya'll.
-p
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)1
What?
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Can't follow?
Not surprised.
-p
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)It's "y'all."
Make a note of it.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)-p
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Truly, WTF?
You're not very good at this.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)cause your a pro.
-p
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)It's "you're" a pro.
Make a note of it.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)Seriously, the teenage like googoo eyed fawning over this mere human being is bizarre.
He's just...a man! That's all. Really! It's true!
Believe it or not, the President takes a stinky dirty shit and wipes his ass just like you do almost every day! (Lol! I wonder if someone will alert on me because they find it heretical that I deign to point out that the President is actually subject to mere human bodily functions.)
Yeah, the guy is OK, he's a far cry from an FDR, but well, he's what we got, and he is certainly way better than any republican.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Stay Classy!
Zorra
(27,670 posts)As for classy, I assure you, my manifestations of grace, style, and sophistication are thoughtfully calculated to be completely appropriate according to the needs of the moment.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Swoon! Swoon!
C'mon get with the program!
Swoon! Swoon!
-p
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)I agree with Rex upthread, when he said re: Pres. Obama - "he pisses off all the right people".
Response to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #109)
Post removed
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)don't it?
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Listen chief, I like him too but there's a big difference between that and idolizing him, get it? He's a politician not the second coming and he's made some pretty hazardous remarks and choices.
But hey, let's make a statue of him and cal him ALLAH!
-p
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)And not just once. Over and over and over and over again.
I mean there has got to be something for these people to take to overcome what's ailing them, ain't it?
What is the cure for drinking five bottles of Haterade each and every goddamned day?
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)At this point, much like the president, I live to piss off the haters.
bigtree
(85,991 posts)Last edited Mon May 20, 2013, 02:11 PM - Edit history (1)
. . . take issue with the comments in this thread, if that's your bag, but this event was very meaningful for the participants at Morehouse. So very manipulative to focus on someone's affinity for Barack Obama, as if to insist that their own perspective and opinion is as narrow as your invented and inflammatory portrayal.
Did you miss that this is a graduation event at Morehouse? Maybe folks here can be afforded some room to express their affinity for this President and to express their pride and admiration in seeing this President at this notable event without being subjected to your bitter and cynical politics?
I guess not. What an appropriate handle.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)The mindless spewing in this thread is beyond pathetic.
Typical of this crowd, sadly.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)The mindless spewing in this thread is beyond pathetic.
Typical of this crowd, sadly.
-p
Actually it doesn't.
The posse that hijacked this thread stick out like a sore thumb.
Own it, you earned it fair and square.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I'll own it that ought to fix things wonderfully.
-p
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Hypocrite :'urging the young men to avoid the temptation to make excuses'
OOOOO are you trying to insinuate that I match my handle name or something to the extent of an insult?
I'm going to tell mom!
-p
Response to Phlem (Reply #119)
bigtree This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)Totally epic, so epic he removed it.
-p
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The momemt a lens comes up.
It has nothing to do with relaxed and all to do with experience.
bigtree
(85,991 posts). . .we've seen this President in MANY situations. This is his persona.
There isn't any knowledgeable narrative that would contradict what we've all witnessed for these many years. I'm surprised that you're compelled to come onto this thread and dismiss this notion. I'm more amazed that you seem willing to dispute it.
He doesn't care for SS changes therefore he'll promote it cause he's playing 13 dimensional chess and us unwashed just don't get it?
that's just 1.
History seems to be non existent in this thread.
-p
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I have like seen this. Like regularly
The current mayor of San Diego is like a prime example. He's been in the game 30+ years, starting with the school board, and a twenty+ year stint in Congress. He sees a camera, let alone many...smile comes up...he is good.
New pol, running for a seat at the Council, first run for political office, like ever...she's told that by her manager regularly. Smile! We at times even wait before pressing the shutter.
Hell, yesterday I was talking to a campaign manager, who's done this for a couple decades. This is one skill they teach....lens comes up....smile. It is in fact, a hard skill to learn.
This is completely separate from policy, but an important skill to master. Some pols, see Bilbray, never learnt it. Damn, I got the best photo of him the night he lost his seat.
For the record, I prefer a smiling pol, who is somewhat animated, they are far easier to photograph, and look far more relaxed.
bigtree
(85,991 posts)I'm really not sure what the standard is for judging this President's character and persona, but we have many, many anecdotal accounts which describe him in many of these same terms. After all, it's this public face which makes up a great deal of his influence, acceptability, and ability to communicate his initiatives and intentions effectively. In effect, his public face - contrived or not - is the relevant one. All indications are, that, we're seeing the real Obama in images such as this. We also have a video to make those judgments. I'm not sure what else he'd need to do to convince someone that he's as calm and relaxed as he appears. I'm not sure that even matters. He has those attributes where and when it counts, according to what we've learned over the years of his time in public office and before, even.
You're a reporter. Show me something other than opinion which contradicts this impression of himself that he's conveying at this event. It's not convincing enough to just express cynicism. show me some account which contradicts these impressions.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)You can add whatever you want to the context.
Pols, good pols, smile and look relaxed regardless of circumstances. That's a fact jack. Why smiling pols in a photo no longer impress me, regardless of party.
I just made a statement of fact, do with it whatever you wish to do.
Have a good day
bigtree
(85,991 posts). . .it makes no sense at all to debate generalities on this thread. Talk about the actual event. Talk about his demeanor. It's not as if we haven't seen numerous politicians who couldn't project much more than contempt, no matter what they endeavored.
The sky appeared blue: Fact.
That has as much to do with the president's overall demeanor and his demeanor at this event as anything you're trying to convey here.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Clinton is also a good example of that, will do that in front of a lens.
I will tell you one pol, at a national level, who never learned, Nixon.
I will tell you another one who was great, Reagan.
You want another who never did, Chenney.
Locally we have to coach one in the local board of supervisors, I swear, cardboard look better in front of a lens.
This is independent of politics or policy. A good pol will do that...a bad one, or fair one, not so much. It's a skill.
And yes, some of us are beyond cynical once we learn how the sausage is actually made.
bigtree
(85,991 posts). . . that his relaxed persona is a put on or eternally genuine. It does matter how he conducts himself; both politically and substantively. It does make a difference in the nature and result of his presidency, whether he's able to convey confidence and the like.
I'm still wondering what there could be, that's so relevant, which would contradict this impression? For all intents and purposes of this presidency, this looks to be his operating mode. What more could we want in a presidential persona? It is 'politics,' after all. He's still challenged to build coalitions of support within and without the democratic system. Cynicism's fine and necessary, but it's a curious thing to reject the overall character of this presidency which has been on display and has served to characterize the actual politics surrounding the office, and substitute something less evident and speculative, instead.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Anymore. Period.
They have nothing to do with policy, one iota.
kentuck
(111,081 posts)is for stupid people.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)"cult of personality"
is for stupid people.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)At Mon May 20, 2013, 01:14 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
That's just wrong to look so effortlessly relaxed, happy & handsome
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022867458
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Shit stirring. With us or against us. No room for disagreement or debate.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon May 20, 2013, 01:23 PM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Unless I'm missing something really, really subtle, this alert ranks pretty high on the list of "shit you didn't get." This is from a website that supports the president.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Without resorting to name-calling, this alert is vapid.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Is this a joke? This post should be recommended.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The alerter is almost certainly a troll. This is without a doubt the single worst alert I've ever been on a jury for.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Someone deservedly lost their alerting privileges for 24 hours.
bigtree
(85,991 posts). . . and it's a hoot that someone would feel threatened by a declaration of his sunny disposition and the rights' antipathy toward all of that.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)is the one that got hit.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)I won't point it out, but I would be astonished if it were a different poster.
Number23
(24,544 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)How dare he??? What's he done for ME lately?
Wait... I can't count that high.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)I consider mail from decent correspondents private, but when a jerk uses it to snarl at me, I post it in public for all to see! (as if you didn't know phlegm's attitude anyway) Question: does derogatory mail get the writer busted for anything? Skinner???
Here's what phlem (who can't even spel that wurd rit) wrote to me:
...........................................................................
Phlem
Usually there's a report filed for this blatant breach of the rules.
As what happened to me. I guess your better than me.
Cheers.
........................................................................................
Kick little old ladies like IA in the shins, buster, and I kick back.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)For my graduation I had to make do with Oprah Winfrey...