Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Wed May 22, 2013, 12:50 PM May 2013

Oklahoma tornado was stronger than Hiroshima bomb

http://m.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0521/Oklahoma-tornado-was-stronger-than-Hiroshima-bomb-How/(page)/2

Oklahoma tornado was stronger than Hiroshima bomb: How?

When the conditions are exactly right – and they were, for the tornado that devastated Oklahoma City yesterday – a tornado can unleash more power than the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima.


By Seth Borenstein, Associated Press / May 21, 2013

<snip>

But when the ideal conditions do occur, watch out. The power of nature beats out anything man can create.

"Everything was ready for explosive development yesterday," said Colorado State University meteorology professor Russ Schumacher, who was in Oklahoma launching airborne devices that measured the energy, moisture and wind speeds on Monday. "It all just unleashed on that one area."

<snip>

Several meteorologists contacted by The Associated Press used real time measurements, some made by Schumacher, to calculate the energy released during the storm's 40-minute life span. Their estimates ranged from 8 times to more than 600 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb, with more experts at the high end. Their calculations were based on energy measured in the air and then multiplied over the size and duration of the storm.

An EF5 tornado has the most violent winds on Earth, more powerful than a hurricane. The strongest winds ever measured were the 302 mph reading, measured by radar, during the EF5 tornado that struck Moore on May 3, 1999, according to Jeff Masters, meteorology director at the Weather Underground.

.. more..






11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oklahoma tornado was stronger than Hiroshima bomb (Original Post) G_j May 2013 OP
Uh. Tornadoes don't unleash radiation. mnhtnbb May 2013 #1
really? G_j May 2013 #2
Well, if it went over a nuclear power plant it might release some. n/t woodsprite May 2013 #3
I think it depends on how you measure strength. LuvNewcastle May 2013 #4
40 minutes vs. a fraction of a second bananas May 2013 #5
Atom bombs aren't all they are cracked up to be KurtNYC May 2013 #6
Didn't fire bombing kill many times more people? Dash87 May 2013 #7
They picked cities for the atom bombs which had not been bombed KurtNYC May 2013 #9
We were going to nuke every city in Japan and Germany bananas May 2013 #10
I hate comparisons like this.... Bigmack May 2013 #8
I believe it. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #11

LuvNewcastle

(16,843 posts)
4. I think it depends on how you measure strength.
Wed May 22, 2013, 01:46 PM
May 2013

The bomb dropped on Hiroshima was certainly more concentrated; the bomb was a fraction of the size of the tornado. Also, the size of the affected area seemed to be greater in Hiroshima than in Moore. From the photos I've seen, it appears that the destruction was worse in Hiroshima, too.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Hiroshima+pictures&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=JgOdUYDkC4TY9ATYioD4CA&ved=0CDEQsAQ&biw=1366&bih=649#tbm=isch&q=hiroshima+explosion&revid=762700370&sa=X&ei=MQOdUcK-LpHS9ATHhIAo&ved=0CJQBEIMW&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.46751780,d.eWU&fp=c95defcf1f4ebc9c&biw=1366&bih=649

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
6. Atom bombs aren't all they are cracked up to be
Wed May 22, 2013, 02:10 PM
May 2013

They didn't 'win the war' and were actually far less destructive than the incidiary bombing raids done on Japan.

The myth that technological innovation win wars will never die.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
9. They picked cities for the atom bombs which had not been bombed
Wed May 22, 2013, 02:49 PM
May 2013

prior, (not military targets) so they could measure the destructive power of the new weapon.

Yes, fire bombings were much more destructive. I recently saw graffiti in Dresden Germany. It said simply: "All War is Terror"

bananas

(27,509 posts)
10. We were going to nuke every city in Japan and Germany
Thu May 23, 2013, 01:59 AM
May 2013

They weren't "more of a psychological attack",
we were mass-producing nuclear weapons in factories,
we were preparing to destroy every city in both Japan and Germany.

Eventually we created enough nukes to destroy every city in the Soviet Union several times over, it was called "overkill".
And the Soviet Union made enough nukes to destroy every city in NATO several times.
That's why it was called mutual "ASSURED" destruction - there was enough overkill that mutual destruction was ASSURED.

You can't do that with firebombing.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
8. I hate comparisons like this....
Wed May 22, 2013, 02:23 PM
May 2013

Hiroshima was a toy bomb compared to now. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima was an atomic bomb, not a nuclear bomb, as stated in the OP. Big diff. Kilotons vs. megatons.

And...

Hiroshima was not an act of nature. Humans did it on purpose.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oklahoma tornado was stro...