Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri May 24, 2013, 04:55 PM May 2013

How Prosecutors Fought to Keep Rosen’s Warrant Secret



The Obama Administration fought to keep a search warrant for James Rosen’s private e-mail account secret, arguing to a federal judge that the government might need to monitor the account for a lengthy period of time.

he new details are revealed in a court filing detailing a back and forth between the Justice Department and the federal judges who oversaw the request to search a Gmail account belonging to Rosen, a reporter for Fox News. A 2009 article Rosen had written about North Korea sparked an investigation; Ronald C. Machen, Jr., the U.S. Attorney who is prosecuting Stephen Jin-Woo Kim, a former State Department adviser who allegedly leaked classified information to Rosen, insisted that the reporter should not be notified of the search and seizure of his e-mails, even after a lengthy delay.

E-mails, Machen wrote, “are commonly used by subjects or targets of the criminal investigation at issue, and the e-mail evidence derived from those compelled disclosures frequently forms the core of the Government’s evidence supporting criminal charges.”

<snip>

The new documents show that two judges separately declared that the Justice Department was required to notify Rosen of the search warrant, even if the notification came after a delay. Otherwise: “The subscriber therefore will never know, by being provided a copy of the warrant, for example, that the government secured a warrant and searched the contents of her e-mail account,” Judge John M. Facciola wrote in an opinion rejecting the Obama Administration’s argument.

Machen appealed that decision, and in September, 2010, Royce C. Lamberth, the chief judge in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, granted Machen’s request to overturn the order of the two judges.

<snip>

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/05/how-justice-fought-to-keep-rosens-warrant-secret.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Prosecutors Fought to Keep Rosen’s Warrant Secret (Original Post) cali May 2013 OP
hmmmmm Royce C. Lamberth. grasswire May 2013 #1
Good information: ProSense May 2013 #2
Yes, it is good information and it's quite revealing re the DoJ under Holder cali May 2013 #3
Yes, ProSense May 2013 #4
Legal but creepy. geek tragedy May 2013 #5

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
1. hmmmmm Royce C. Lamberth.
Fri May 24, 2013, 05:02 PM
May 2013

Isn't he notorious for stinky decisions made during previous administrations?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Good information:
Fri May 24, 2013, 05:09 PM
May 2013
Machen appealed that decision, and in September, 2010, Royce C. Lamberth, the chief judge in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, granted Machen’s request to overturn the order of the two judges.

Rosen was not indicted in the case. Kim was indicted for making unauthorized disclosures of national defense information and for making false statements to F.B.I. agents about his contacts with Rosen.

Warrants and decisions by judges.


ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. Yes,
Fri May 24, 2013, 05:12 PM
May 2013

"Yes, it is good information and it's quite revealing re the DoJ under Holder"

...it operates within the law.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Prosecutors Fought to...