General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIllinois Bans Abstinence-Only Sex Ed: ‘In Fantasy Land, We Teach Our Kids Abstinence’
Illinois public schools will be required to include medically accurate information about birth control in their sex ed classes under a measure that the state legislature passed this week. HB 2675, which Gov. Pat Quinn (D) is expected to sign into law, will prohibit health classes from teaching abstinence-only curricula.
Illinois current law requires sex ed classes to emphasize abstinence as the expected norm, and stipulates that course material and instruction shall stress that pupils should abstain from sexual intercourse until they are ready for marriage. Public schools can choose between teaching abstinence-only education, using a mix of stressing abstinence while providing comprehensive information about birth control and condoms, or simply declining to provide any sex ed instruction. Under HB 2675, schools wont be able to choose the abstinence-only option anymore theyll need to either offer comprehensive information about prevention methods, or decide not to offer any sex ed courses whatsoever.
State Sen. Linda Holmes (D) spearheaded the measure because she doesnt believe that abstinence-only curricula adequately equips teens with the resources they need to safeguard their sexual health. In fantasy land, we teach our kids abstinence and they listen. But we know they dont necessarily follow that advice, Holmes explained. They are going to be confronted with the issue of sex before theyre 21 years old, or 25, or whenever they decide to get married.
Holmes is right. By their 19th birthday, seven in ten American teens will have had sex. And even the Americans who grow up in socially conservative communities arent delaying sex until marriage by some estimates, 80 percent of unmarried evangelical Christians have had sex at least once. But when those young people become sexually active, they often dont understand how to effectively protect themselves. Since abstinence-only classes often mislead students about the facts about contraception, 60 percent of young adults underestimate birth controls effectiveness and are more likely to skip it because they dont believe it will make a difference.
full article:
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/05/24/2058601/illinois-bans-abstinence-sex-ed/
louis-t
(23,288 posts)"don't do it cuz I say so" only works for so long.
surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)... but I imagine most of those "abstinence-only" districts will opt for no sex-ed, rather than teaching about contraception, after which they'll try to shoehorn some sort of "morals education" in by some other route.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)If parents think it's important, they can have the birds and bees talk with their kids. No reason to wait for school sex ed. They can get a book, etc. If the parents want their kids to practice abstinence, they can educate their kids that way.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)that is why real sex Ed should be required in schools. And for the record, my father bought a book about it for me when I was 12, and we had discussions about the book. He really stressed that if I must do it, wear a condom.
surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)That doesn't mean the subject should not be taught in school though.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Because sex ed has been so screwed up and the religious attack on science, I'm sure there are plenty of people who have bred who still don't understand how the process works. Human biology is science, and should be taught in school.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)want to force this on schools, they still cannot GAG a parent from teaching their own kids about birth control.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)However abstinence only education doesn't work. Which I'm sure is what you meant.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)maybe kids will learn something useful.
Cha
(297,123 posts)Reality is where it's at.
thanks DV
sheshe2
(83,728 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)Myrina
(12,296 posts)No public schools, no factual sex-ed. Charter schools can teach all the religious based abstinence-only bullshit they want, though.
ck4829
(35,042 posts)Will they ever find out how that works?
No. Good work, Illinois. K&R.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)How on earth did all those nutters--some of whom claim to be doctors--get those insane ideas? Because they were never taught the real truth and so accepted those ignorant lies. When you're a kid, where do you learn sex from first? Your friends. There are a lot of rumors and half-truths in there. I remember two kids in junior high trying to have sex, but since we hadn't gotten to that in school, they couldn't figure out how to do it. I met a graduate student in college who thought that women urinated from their vaginas.
That is why, as embarrassing and eyeroll worthy the sex ed programs are, at least they provide a bedrock of some truth. I remember a series of books by an author called Judy Bloom that dealt with sexual maturity written for teens that our parents were up in arms about and we secretly exchanged. It was a good place to find things out.
We think that like so many things, if we shield our children and make some magical fantasy world for them, they will never have to deal with reality. I've met plenty sheltered children and adults and they are the most immature, ill-prepared, lost people in the world. Yet all my friends are parenting their children this way, though they would never admit that to themselves.