Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClimateProgress has Detailed Smackdown of Myles Allen (Mr. 'billions wasted on global warming')..
If you want to learn about climate science, look to climate scientists, I always say. But if you want to learn about climate policy and energy technology, well, you might try looking elsewhere.
A case in point is British climate scientist, Myles Allen. He noted in the Daily Mail On Sunday (MoS) that were doomed to disastrous warming if we keep burning carbon even if a recent paper he coauthored about a low climate sensitivity turns out to be true. But then he went on to argue that the only solution and he does mean only solution is to mandate that companies capture and store the carbon they release.
Allens policy discussion is precisely the kind of nonsense youd expect in the Mail, whose climate coverage is so atavastic, it makes the Wall Street Journal editorial page look like Climate Central. It is simply head-exploding that any serious climate scientist would publish a piece in publication discredited by so many climate scientists.
....
The fact is that CCS remains stuck in the pre-demonstration phase, after most of the worlds large-scale demonstration projects died or were killed in the last few years, while the futile and pointless investments in wind power have already succeeded in bringing down the cost of that commercial technology steadily:
....
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/05/29/2066701/climatologist-myles-allen-says-were-doomed-if-we-keep-burning-carbon-then-embraces-dubious-silver-bullet/
A case in point is British climate scientist, Myles Allen. He noted in the Daily Mail On Sunday (MoS) that were doomed to disastrous warming if we keep burning carbon even if a recent paper he coauthored about a low climate sensitivity turns out to be true. But then he went on to argue that the only solution and he does mean only solution is to mandate that companies capture and store the carbon they release.
Allens policy discussion is precisely the kind of nonsense youd expect in the Mail, whose climate coverage is so atavastic, it makes the Wall Street Journal editorial page look like Climate Central. It is simply head-exploding that any serious climate scientist would publish a piece in publication discredited by so many climate scientists.
....
The fact is that CCS remains stuck in the pre-demonstration phase, after most of the worlds large-scale demonstration projects died or were killed in the last few years, while the futile and pointless investments in wind power have already succeeded in bringing down the cost of that commercial technology steadily:
....
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/05/29/2066701/climatologist-myles-allen-says-were-doomed-if-we-keep-burning-carbon-then-embraces-dubious-silver-bullet/
Me? I'll stick with James Hansen. I'm odd that way.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 611 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ClimateProgress has Detailed Smackdown of Myles Allen (Mr. 'billions wasted on global warming').. (Original Post)
Junkdrawer
May 2013
OP
Link here; glad to see they confirm my basic criticism of the article
muriel_volestrangler
May 2013
#1
muriel_volestrangler
(101,297 posts)1. Link here; glad to see they confirm my basic criticism of the article
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)2. Oops...wrong link....fixed....