If you agree with the DOJ subpoena in the Rosen case, you're anti-First Amendment

[ProSense]

CNN: DOJ Has Proof It Alerted News Corp. Of Rosen Subpoena
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022918692

Why James Rosen Is Not Blameless
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022918986

3 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes
	0 (0%)
	No
	3 (100%)
	Not sure
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[Drale]

1. I'm confused

your saying that if you agree with the DOJ that they alerted News Corps about the Rosen Subpoena than you are anti-first amendment so whats the pole for?

[ProSense]

3. Hope the edit clarifies it. n/t

[Drale]

5. I'm still confused

are you asking if you agree with the DOJ, are you anti-first amendment?

[ProSense]

9. "If you agree with the DOJ subpoena in the Rosen case, you're anti-First Amendment"

That's the question.

[Drale]

12. That's not a question though

its a statement

[ProSense]

13. Do you agree with the statement?

Polls often phrase choices as statements.

The "Yes" or "No" implies choice.

[Buzz Clik]

2. No idea what the poll is asking.

[ProSense]

4. Is that better? n/t

[Buzz Clik]

11. We are responding to the statement in the title, right?

If we vote no, we don't feel that DOJ was acting unconstitutionally.

Voting yes means that the subpoena was a violation of first amendment rights.

Correct?

[ProSense]

14. Yes, that's correct.

Thanks for clarifying.

[Enrique]

6. "No" indicates support for Obama

which is the most important thing.

[ProSense]

10. What does "Yes" indicate? n/t

[Enrique]

15. Obama Derangement Syndrome

naturally

[ProSense]

16. Thanks for your perspective. n/t

[randome]

7. Actually, no one can legitimately 'agree' with the subpoena since no one knows all the facts.

It's possible the DOJ over-reached. It's also possible that Rosen fucked up.

It's also possible that this has nothing to do with Rosen and the DOJ wants to find the person in their midst who is in a trustworthy position but who clearly cannot be trusted.

But both pro and con on the subpoena issue, we should let the case play out in the judicial system and see what happens then.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

[railsback]

8. So if I agree with the DOJ subpoena of Rosen

I'm anti-First Amendment?