General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTea Party Conference Call Features Threat To Assassinate U.S. Senator Because She Supports Immigrati
In a Tea Party-sponsored conference call held on Wednesday night, a participant called for the assassination of Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) over her support for immigration reform. Prominent conservative policymakers Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)s communications director Stephen Miller and Heritage Foundation research fellow Robert Rector also joined the call, hosted by the conservative Eagle Forum group.
The most jarring and unexpected moment of the night was when the moderator opened up the phone lines to callers:
BOB FROM MAINE: Im from Maine and our Tea Party will be meeting up next week. What is the best way that we can get our senator to listen to us?
ANOTHER CALLER: Shoot her. [laughter]
MODERATOR: Yes, we will shoot her with
(inaudible) and phone calls.
After the anonymous statement was made, no one on the call voiced their opposition. Instead, the threat was met with laughter and oohs. (At the time of the incident, Sessions communications director had apparently left the call.) Calling for the assassination of a senator is a federal crime punishable by five years of jail and may require a Secret Service investigation.
more . . . http://thinkprogress.org/immigration/2013/05/30/2076221/tea-partiers-call-for-assassinating-senator/
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)R
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Just Saying
(1,799 posts)These threats must be taken seriously ! I'm tired of hearing threats of violence from the right and nobody calling them on it even when it's carried out.
Oh and the current ricin attacks are a good example of the right's violent tendencies.
When do we on the left call for violence let alone act on it?
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Better not investigate or the GOP might Gripe Or Pout!
[font size="1"]...whaaaaa! You're picking on us!
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
pampango
(24,692 posts)has not sparked a groundswell of opposition to "amnesty" as happened in 2007.
In truth, the policy of providing repeated amnesties without enforcing the border does not make any sense unless the intent is to eventually eliminate the border as part of a broader agenda to establish a North American Union.The evidence demonstrates this is exactly whats happening.
Our internationalist-minded leaders have not ceased their efforts to create more stable, more cooperative units. During his recent State of the Union address (SOTU), President Obama promoted the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TAP) which would combine the United States and the rest of NAFTA with some Pacific Rim nations and the EU.
In response to Obamas plug for the trans-oceanic partnerships, investigative reporter Jerome Corsi noted: Obamas open discussion of the two-oceans TPP and TAP free trade agendas during his recent SOTU attests to the persistence of globalists. ... In order to prevent this, both sides of the internationalists agenda must be countered simultaneously: [b/]Illegal immigration must be controlled and amnesty denied, and new free trade pacts between the United States and other nations must be stopped and existing ones, such as NAFTA, repealed.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/15010-permanent-amnesty-temporary-border
Their tune never changes.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I will lay responsibility at the feet of John McCain and Sarah Palin and the leadership of the Republican party who unleashed these rabid animals.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)The spirits unleashed were such as I hadn't witnessed since the days of the Civil Rights murders. Was shocked, stunned, scared. It was like going back in time and made me rdoubt that this nation was destined to progress.