Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ashling

(25,771 posts)
Thu May 30, 2013, 07:22 PM May 2013

Reinhart And Rogoff's Pro-Austerity Research Now Even More Thoroughly Debunked By Studies



The debunking of Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff continues.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/30/reinhart-rogoff-debunked_n_3361299.html


This contradicts the conclusion of Reinhart and Rogoff's 2010 paper, "Growth in a Time of Debt," which has been used to justify austerity programs around the world. In that paper, and in many other papers, op-ed pieces and congressional testimony over the years, Reinhart And Rogoff have warned that high debt slows down growth, making it a huge problem to be dealt with immediately. The human costs of this error have been enormous.

Even after University of Massachusetts graduate student Thomas Herndon found Reinhart and Rogoff's work included errors and that their 2010 paper was missing important data, the researchers stood by their ultimate conclusion: that growth dropped off significantly after debt hit 90 percent of GDP. They claimed that austerity opponents like Paul Krugman have been so so rude to them for no good reason.

At the same time, they have tried to distance themselves a bit from the chicken-and-egg problem of whether debt causes slow growth, or vice-versa. "The frontier question for research is the issue of causality," they said in their lengthy New York Times piece responding to Herndon.

It looks like they should have thought a little harder about that frontier question three years ago.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reinhart And Rogoff's Pro-Austerity Research Now Even More Thoroughly Debunked By Studies (Original Post) ashling May 2013 OP
It Seems to Me- ruffburr May 2013 #1
Indeed. Jackpine Radical May 2013 #2
Alrighty Then- ruffburr May 2013 #3
I'm only good at the pardon my French French. Paulie May 2013 #7
come back to in the morning. rurallib May 2013 #4
Best commentary ever: Steven Colbert on Reinhart and Rogoff mountain grammy May 2013 #5
K&R. This is excellent! Just what they deserve! Overseas May 2013 #6
They are so misunderstood - SARCASM ashling May 2013 #8
K&R idwiyo May 2013 #9
It's just another con game by the 1 % deutsey May 2013 #10
k&r Starry Messenger May 2013 #11
i have a hard time seeing this as an honest error nashville_brook May 2013 #12

ruffburr

(1,190 posts)
1. It Seems to Me-
Thu May 30, 2013, 07:53 PM
May 2013

That carmen and ken were/are paid shills for corporate interests,visa-vie A close to slave wage standard for all but the elite money changers and right wing pol's, Another step in the planned gilded age of the 21st Century

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
2. Indeed.
Thu May 30, 2013, 09:35 PM
May 2013

And if you will tolerate a small intrusion from the Language Nazis, I think you mean "vis–à–vis." In French it literally means "face-to-face."

ashling

(25,771 posts)
8. They are so misunderstood - SARCASM
Fri May 31, 2013, 05:30 AM
May 2013


They claimed that austerity opponents like Paul Krugman have been so so rude to them for no good reason.


That Krugman fellow was so uncivil

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
10. It's just another con game by the 1 %
Fri May 31, 2013, 08:58 AM
May 2013

That's the only way they can get their way...deceit, outright lies, rigging the game, manipulation.

Fortunately for them, there's been more than just one sucker born every minute over the past 30 or 40 years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reinhart And Rogoff's Pro...