General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow story on Ron Paul: "Paul: All your delegates are belong to me" (VIDEO)
Video on the show's site:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#46349475
Rachel: "In other words, it doesn't matter who you voted for. Your vote counts for Ron Paul."
elleng
(130,768 posts)and delegate selection occurs elsewhere!
HAHAHAHA!
marlakay
(11,432 posts)I moved to WA state where we have caucus also and learned the rules. After you vote in groups by your neighborhood or area they have you vote and whoever gets the most votes in your area gets the delegates. But then after
and thats the part she talked about you vote on who goes to the state convention and brings the vote there. At the convention the person can vote for whoever they want even though your area told them a certain person.
Last time and I live in a small town we had these 3 people who changed their vote from clinton to Obama so we could all agree. Then they said since they were "always" the ones who went to the state convention they wanted to go and would vote for Obama for us.
I didn't trust them, at the time the war between Clinton and Obama was still going on and I wanted someone going to the convention who believed in my candidate so I talked a few others next to me into outvoting them and sending 3 people who were devoted Obama fans. I am sure I didn't make any friends that day. Thank god I didn't know any of them
I had no idea that a vote could be changed at convention no matter how the people vote.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Who knew?
What a clusterfuck.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)I wish him luck in that regard.
highplainsdem
(48,921 posts)Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)To stop Ron Paul. Now that Romney and the establishment know his strategy, it's going to get real ugly.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)denbot
(9,898 posts)Schadenfreude, I haz it!
[IMG][/IMG]
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Perfect.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,271 posts)or didn't bother explaining it clearly to each caucus meeting. But then again, Republicans can be amazingly dumb at times. Still, I thought their expertise was in getting votes to turn out most positively for themselves.
There's an article on this here: http://ivn.us/news/2012/02/09/whos-really-ahead-current-gop-delegate-tally-guesses-or-fact/
It suggests that maybe Gingrich hasn't been trying hard in the caucus states because their campaign decided they weren't going to reflect the voting of the average Republican who turns up anyway.