General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums(USA Today) Editorial: Obama's contraception retreat is not enough
Most American women including most Catholic women disagree with the 1968 encyclical in which Pope Paul VI held that contraception contravenes God's will. But church doctrine isn't set by opinion poll, or even by lay members of the faith, and the Constitution draws a bright line against government meddling in church affairs.
So President Obama beat a smart, strategic retreat Friday on the combustible issue of which employers should be required to offer contraceptive services to their employees. Obama did what he should have done in the first place: broaden the religious exemptions to the administration's birth control mandate to cover Catholic institutions such as universities, hospitals and charities, not just churches.
Under the new policy details to follow no church-affiliated institution with a doctrinal objection to contraception would have to pay for the coverage, or even tell employees that it's offered. Insurers would have to inform covered employees that it's available and free.
The policy shift is getting mixed reviews from Catholic organizations, and it leaves some knotty questions to be resolved:
- more -
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/story/2012-02-12/Obama-contraception-mandate-Catholic/53064884/1
It seems that when progress is to be made on significant issues, especially when it challenges the RW institutions that have a stranglehold on civil rights, the media can always be counted on to side with the RW.
GOP Continues To Oppose Contraception Coverage Plan Now Supported By Large Catholic Institutions
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002302328
Why the Contraception Mandate Matters
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002302957
1ProudAtheist
(346 posts)the SCOTUS feels otherwise.....
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0494_0872_ZO.html
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"the SCOTUS feels otherwise....."
...and pundits don't care about that. Their only goal is to help the RW score political points by knocking the administration.
Obamas Conscience Protection Clause Has Been Upheld In Court
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002292691
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)PSPS
(13,588 posts)Yes, and there is also a bright line against the church meddling in governmental affairs. At least there used to be. If the hospitals and other institutions controlled by the catholic church want to eschew the billions of taxpayer dollars they receive every year, then they are free to impose their nefarious and, frankly, somewhat hypocritical "moral codes" on their employees along with its apparently requisite substandard health care coverage (applies to women only, naturally. They are the ones with that scary vagina, after all.)
But we are living in a de-facto theocracy now. The catholic bishops are our veto-wielding mullahs and our politicians are required to be "believers."
"government meddling in church affairs"
...the thing: When on earth did a woman's health care choice become "meddling in church affairs"?
They don't get to dictate: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002292691
Botany
(70,483 posts)1) President Obama gave the "anti folks" everything they asked for ....
you don't want your company's insurance to pay for contraceptives then
you don't have to.
b) the Catholic Church and right wing folks are just running a game here ...
because President Obama has turned the economy around and killed Osama
bin Laden"
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)Irishonly
(3,344 posts)President Obama could end world hunger, find a cure for cancer and the GOP would whine.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)you're only just NOW "starting to believe" it?