General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould Ron Paul demand a new vote count in Maine?
Should Ron Paul demand a new vote tally for the Maine caucuses? On Feb. 12, state GOP officials announced that Mitt Romney had won the Pine Tree State confabs by a narrow 194 votes. But since then theres been increasing evidence that Romneys margin of victory was somewhat notional.
Maines Washington County canceled its caucuses due to weather, yet the state party went ahead and called the election without them, for instance. A few other towns had previously scheduled their caucuses for the post-Feb. 12 period, and their totals werent included either.
Now it appears that some towns which did caucus did not have their vote totals listed in the states final count. The vote for most Waldo County towns was entered as 0, pointed out the Bangor Daily News on Feb. 14. Watervilles numbers were similarly omitted.
More here:
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2012/0215/Should-Ron-Paul-demand-a-new-vote-count-in-Maine
rocktivity
(44,575 posts)And send the state party chairman packing.
rocktivity
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)cbrer
(1,831 posts)But the Oligarchs have made their mind up that Obama will be re-elected. He finally came around to taking their bribes, so he's OK.
karynnj
(59,501 posts)and it is NOT the "oligarch" eliminating a candidate. Obama is beating all of them - including Paul who is easily defeated by the many extreme things he has stood for. This does not involve the Democratic party. This mess belongs to what seems to be your party.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)For sarcasm...
It seems that you immediately leapt past my attempt to make multiple points. Not the least of which were the corporate-ocracy that does in fact exist, as well as the fact that our Prez is taking super PAC money now.
Gore1FL
(21,127 posts)It's state-by-state party rules mixed in with national party rules.
I know none of them.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)...if for no other reason than to shine a light on the chicanery we can expect to see in the general election.
TYY
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Wonder what Willard has in mind in the fall, should he get that far?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Now all his nutty peeps will be driven to get there and try to put him over the top..
LOL
saras
(6,670 posts)Seriously. There's no excuse to tolerate dishonest voting, even if it looks like it helps you, in the long run it will only help people worse than you.
Jazzgirl
(3,744 posts)FSogol
(45,473 posts)I say at least 10.