General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet's call the Virginia law what it is: State-mandated rape by proxy
Last night Rachel Maddow danced around explaining Virginia's proposed law requiring women wanting abortions to undergo a transvaginal ultrasound. She seemed to have problems even saying the word "vagina" and simply talked about "things inserted into your body".
Let's stop playing word games
This is legally sanctioned rape, end of discussion.
The state is compelling a doctor to perform an unnecessary medical procedure on an unwilling patient in order to get the medical treatment she needs.
The ultrasound probe is the state of Virginia's penis, and it is being used to sexually assault a woman because some sick and depraved politicians wish to demean women the do not approve of.
The woman is coerced into sitting in stirrups and submitting to a legal rape.
These very same sad, old, sexually deviant white men wish to punish any woman seeking an abortion, but you can bet your last dollar that if any of their mistresses or daughters have an "inconvenient" pregnancy, they will never be subject to this official rape. Instead, they will be given an abortion on the sly from a "helpful" doctor, or after a quick trip to Canada or England.
Let me reiterate, because I cannot stress enough the perversion being perpetrated by the Virginia government:
The Commonwealth (oh, the irony) of Virginia will force an unwilling doctor to vaginally rape with a medical instrument, a coerced and unwilling woman.
Folks, The Handmaid's Tale is now close to being a documentary, the Republic of Gilead is nigh.
The phone number for the Virginia governor's office is 804-786-2211
Cross-posted to my blog
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)would you mind posting this in the feminist forum for us so we can be sure to call tomorrow. the board is way slower than GD and will stay visible longer.
i would appreciate. if not i will do it in the morning if i remember. not good at that memory thing
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)thanks for the suggestion.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Ilsa
(61,694 posts)long enough to keep it visible so people can call tomorrow.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Ilsa
(61,694 posts)I had wanted to post something, but I've had too many distractions with my kids to funnel my anger in to a coherent writing. You nailed it: Rape By Proxy. The legislators are wanna-be rapists. They are closed-minded, vicious misogynists.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Somewhere along the line their sexuality was distorted by religion (I have yet to meet an atheist that supports things like this) and this is how they get their jollies.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)I was fortunate enough to have delivered all of my children at home by a midwife...
I am horrified by the possibility of this becoming law that other women must be subjected to
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)That said, I am rather bothered that this post got very little traction here.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Response to Kelvin Mace (Original post)
Ilsa This message was self-deleted by its author.
LiberalFighter
(50,871 posts)and let them know about the legislation they are trying to pass.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)No sex until this nonsense stops!
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)EFerrari
(163,986 posts)warrior1
(12,325 posts)It has be unconstitutional.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)The other point of this bill is to get Roe overturned by the SCOTUS.
A similar bill passed in Texas and is under appeal, but is in force in the mean time.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Do these knuckle-dragging swine have no wives, no sisters, no daughters? How can they do this to them?
Oh wait, I forgot. If it happens to THEIR family members, they take care of it discretely, out of state. It's fine for them and theirs, just not for us and ours. Damn it but I hate these bastards. There aren't words enough to capture the depth of my hatred.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)wives (probably more than one), daughters and sisters.
And we should mourn for these women who must deal with these men.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)protect our future
(1,156 posts)implications, should this become law, could very well lead to sudden problems in the bedroom. Has anyone realized that yet?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)and they do not care.
The only way we can stop this is to start making it VERY hot for McDonnell. Start attaching the title "Rapist-in-Chief to his name.
protect our future
(1,156 posts)responsible for this legislation have thought that far ahead. I think there may be a wave of headaches and other reasons for women to refuse sex if this becomes law, as fear and anger will take their toll.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)is they don't think, PERIOD.
I am getting cynical in my old age, but being a man, and spending time with many males of this type makes me so. I have so very little in common with these people, that most of my friends are women (about a 5:2 ratio, and I include my wife). Looking back over my lifetime, male friends are rare.