Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
why aren't vasectomies controversial? (Original Post) ibegurpard Feb 2012 OP
As the old saying goes, "if men had menstrual periods... Scuba Feb 2012 #1
And if Men got pregnant... trumad Feb 2012 #2
And there would be a "Largest Clot" contest at halftime of the Super Bowl. 11 Bravo Feb 2012 #20
+1000000000 Tsiyu Feb 2012 #38
The menstrual cycle is one of the better arguments against "intelligent design" FarCenter Feb 2012 #36
Not that intelligent to run a toxic waste line through a recreation area. Scuba Feb 2012 #42
I've been asking the same...as well as Viagra...is that covered? Frustratedlady Feb 2012 #3
not sure about viagara but a vasectomy seems more relevant ibegurpard Feb 2012 #4
tubal ligation Tennessee Gal Feb 2012 #10
If by 'slammed', you mean 'banned by the Catholic hierarchy', then they are muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #15
well, because it would invade a man's right to privacy! CTyankee Feb 2012 #24
You mean "bodily mutilation"? That's the reasoning behind the hedgehog Feb 2012 #28
pretty sure viagra gets covered by insurance -- I heard this some years back. nt Voice for Peace Feb 2012 #21
Impotence drugs are usually covered by insurance. That should be part of Liquorice Feb 2012 #27
hell yeah! Maine-ah Feb 2012 #35
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #52
I'm looking at getting one. At a little over $600 I don't care whether it's covered or not - Edweird Feb 2012 #5
Make sure you do a lot of research first. safeinOhio Feb 2012 #7
Care to elaborate? Edweird Feb 2012 #8
Sorry to hear that ... BOHICA12 Feb 2012 #39
I had a vasectomy. No problems so far, but... Scuba Feb 2012 #14
Since it would be elective surgery I would guess no davidpdx Feb 2012 #45
I assumed that but the website does talk about insurance, so.... Edweird Feb 2012 #48
Wow is it that much? davidpdx Feb 2012 #50
If they could use it as a wedge issue it would assuredly by controversial lunatica Feb 2012 #6
You mean a wedgie issue. undeterred Feb 2012 #25
I wish someone would yank a wedgie on them lunatica Feb 2012 #30
vasectomies aren't controversial handmade34 Feb 2012 #9
Bingo! nt SammyWinstonJack Feb 2012 #13
The Church doesn't view male sterilization any differently than female sterilizations. WillowTree Feb 2012 #11
Because it's a man making the decision n/t Aerows Feb 2012 #12
That's what I keep saying - but hey, that's a "guy" thing. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #16
There's no way to use vasectomies to oppress women. Doh. saras Feb 2012 #17
Also, how often have doctors required a wife's permission prior to a vasectomy? shcrane71 Feb 2012 #18
I dated a guy who couldn't get a vasectomy in Orange Co, CA without kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #22
My medical coverage through my employer wouldn't pay for it in the mid-1970's NNN0LHI Feb 2012 #19
Maybe that is why they expect to have that power over birth control treestar Feb 2012 #32
My husband's wasn't covered under insurance, but back then (20 years ago) it was $300 phylny Feb 2012 #23
Men control virtually everything in this country. Rex Feb 2012 #26
Among hyper-fundies they are XemaSab Feb 2012 #29
Good point treestar Feb 2012 #31
Vasectomies are covered by health insurance Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #33
After a little googling, it appears that some insurance covers and some does not FarCenter Feb 2012 #34
Easy! Cherchez la Femme Feb 2012 #37
Well, they USED to be a very, very big deal. The FIL was excommunicated for his vasectomy Turn CO Blue Feb 2012 #40
pre conception Motown_Johnny Feb 2012 #41
Because oftentimes, it's the "easiest" sterilization for a couple SoCalDem Feb 2012 #43
Can anyone point to an instance of Catholic inistitutions paying for vasectomies but not the pill? muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #44
because it's a man's choice pstokely Feb 2012 #46
No and it's kind of sad that it isn't davidpdx Feb 2012 #47
i remember mine was very controversial SwampG8r Feb 2012 #49
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #51

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
4. not sure about viagara but a vasectomy seems more relevant
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 09:56 AM
Feb 2012

and what's the procedure where women get their tubes tied called? Why aren't these procedures slammed on like other methods of birth control?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,271 posts)
15. If by 'slammed', you mean 'banned by the Catholic hierarchy', then they are
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 10:58 AM
Feb 2012

Humanae Vitae:

Equally to be condemned, as the magisterium of the Church has affirmed on many occasions, is direct sterilization, whether of the man or of the woman, whether permanent or temporary.

http://catholic.christianityinview.com/morals.html


Like other methods of birth control, typical Catholics pay no attention to this. But the Bishops hate it just as much as the pill, IUDs etc.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
28. You mean "bodily mutilation"? That's the reasoning behind the
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 06:35 PM
Feb 2012

ban on tubal litigation or vasectomy. Trust me, as a mother of six (all dearly wanted buy the way!), I got a thing or two to tell you about bodily mutilation!

Liquorice

(2,066 posts)
27. Impotence drugs are usually covered by insurance. That should be part of
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 06:19 PM
Feb 2012

any headline about the debate over birth control being covered. Viagra is widely used as a recreational drug as well, and apparently the Catholic church has no objections at all to that.

In Foster Friess time, maybe women held aspirin between their knees for contraception, but old men who couldn't get it up anymore had to stop having sex. Now these men pop a pill covered by insurance, while women are still holding the aspirin between their knees.

Response to Liquorice (Reply #27)

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
5. I'm looking at getting one. At a little over $600 I don't care whether it's covered or not -
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 09:57 AM
Feb 2012

it's still a bargain. I am more than happy to pay in full, in cash. As far as 'controversy' goes, I couldn't possibly care less one way or the other. I do as I choose.

safeinOhio

(32,641 posts)
7. Make sure you do a lot of research first.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 10:02 AM
Feb 2012

Mine caused some unexpected consequences that I now suffer.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
45. Since it would be elective surgery I would guess no
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 08:16 AM
Feb 2012

I had mine about 14 years ago and have never had a problem.

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
48. I assumed that but the website does talk about insurance, so....
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 03:47 AM
Feb 2012

I'm fine with it either way. I'll gladly pay the 6-something or happily pay a co-pay.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
50. Wow is it that much?
Sun Feb 26, 2012, 08:54 AM
Feb 2012

It was below three hundred when I had mine. Get some icepacks. You'll need them for about a week due to blueballs.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
6. If they could use it as a wedge issue it would assuredly by controversial
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 10:01 AM
Feb 2012

But men making choices has always been OK. That is, as long as they aren't gay men, of course.

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
11. The Church doesn't view male sterilization any differently than female sterilizations.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 10:20 AM
Feb 2012

Neither is approved of.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
17. There's no way to use vasectomies to oppress women. Doh.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:00 PM
Feb 2012

The ONE place vasectomies are controversial are when a guy lies about having one, and the courts say tough shit, lady.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
18. Also, how often have doctors required a wife's permission prior to a vasectomy?
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:06 PM
Feb 2012

I've heard of countless times, even in this "modern" age, of release forms needing to be signed by husbands prior to a woman getting a hysterectomy.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
22. I dated a guy who couldn't get a vasectomy in Orange Co, CA without
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:38 PM
Feb 2012

his LIVE-IN GIRLFRIEND'S signature. He tried before they lived together and doctors behind the Orange Curtain wouldn't - so she moved in and signed the papers. This was just a few years ago - since 2000.

NNN0LHI

(67,190 posts)
19. My medical coverage through my employer wouldn't pay for it in the mid-1970's
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 12:10 PM
Feb 2012

And when I inquired why that was the case I was told it was that way because of the Catholic Church.

Don

treestar

(82,383 posts)
32. Maybe that is why they expect to have that power over birth control
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 06:51 PM
Feb 2012

What's strange is, they feel the need to try to make it hard to pay for the procedure, as though they cannot trust people, even Catholics, not to get them because they are supposed to be wrong under their religious tenets.

phylny

(8,368 posts)
23. My husband's wasn't covered under insurance, but back then (20 years ago) it was $300
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 05:03 PM
Feb 2012

and we paid it gladly.

I would have happily had a tubal, but our baby was born at a Catholic hospital. My OBGYN (a man) told me, "Have your husband get a vasectomy. It's cheaper and safer." So we did.

I always thought it was stupid for insurance companies not to cover birth control or sterilization, since less kids meant less to cover, but what do I know?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
26. Men control virtually everything in this country.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 06:15 PM
Feb 2012

Women are still very far away from reaching the goal of equality and many a man 'in power' knows that and wants to delay that from happening for as long as possible. Whenever I use the PTB it does not include any woman I can think of in that institutionalized, power-control structure. Women have not 'made it' there yet, maybe simply for the reason it would be new competition IOW bad for business for a Good O Boys club.

People sometimes assume women have made it in the M$M, but they were all hired by men. If women controlled the media (which to do so they would have to control many other things first) you might see vasectomies more in the news. I doubt it and we will never know. All we can do is speculate how things would be.

Another reason, men control everything.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
29. Among hyper-fundies they are
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 06:39 PM
Feb 2012

There are quite a few men who get reversals and have more kids in the super-duper fundie crowd.

Missy Vixen

(16,207 posts)
33. Vasectomies are covered by health insurance
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 08:03 PM
Feb 2012

Vasectomies are also typically not a topic of conversation among anyone else but spouses.

IMHO.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
34. After a little googling, it appears that some insurance covers and some does not
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 09:11 PM
Feb 2012

So check with your insurance company as to whether it is covered.

My recollection (now dim and hazy) is that it was not covered. (Although maybe it was below the deductible -- back then health insurance was insurance for large, unexpected expenses, rather than prepaid routine medical care.)

Turn CO Blue

(4,221 posts)
40. Well, they USED to be a very, very big deal. The FIL was excommunicated for his vasectomy
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 02:04 AM
Feb 2012

by the Catholic church. Actually, the mother-in-law was excommunicated as well. This was here north of Denver about 40 years ago. So the priests move at a glacial pace, but maybe they have moved a bit on this one subject...because they don't seem to be making a big deal out of this being such a big sin anymore or over insurance covering this procedure. But give the old farts a couple of minutes to think about it, and they'll start another battle on this issue and make it another war against women vicariously through men.

I consider my own husband's vasectomy as our final decision on our family planning to be a major win for my own (womanly) health and the hubby agreed - that is why he went through it even though he would rather have his fingernails pulled out than to see a doctor for anything especially about THAT

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
43. Because oftentimes, it's the "easiest" sterilization for a couple
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:27 AM
Feb 2012

especially if the reason FOR the sterilization is because another pregnancy for the woman is life-threatening, it makes sense to take the easiest route..

Truth-be-told, many men are still not willing to do it, so the woman has to have a tubal ligation.

I don't know if it's different these days, but it used to be an office visit sort of thing, with some discomfort for a while, but not as big of a deal or as expensive as surgery on the woman.,

muriel_volestrangler

(101,271 posts)
44. Can anyone point to an instance of Catholic inistitutions paying for vasectomies but not the pill?
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:36 AM
Feb 2012

There seems to be an assumption in this thread that they do. I have seen no evidence for that; but people seem to be ignoring either examples where vasectomies were condemned by the church (eg #40), or quotes that they are 'forbidden' (eg #15). Here's another:

Catholic health care organizations and other affiliated groups are prohibited from providing or supporting services that prevent or substitute for fertilization by sexual intercourse, according to the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.

Banned services include contraception (including so-called morning-after drugs), sterilization (such as fallopian tubectomy or vasectomy), artificial insemination, surrogate motherhood and abortion (under any circumstances).

http://www.kjonline.com/news/Maine-diocese-leading-fight-against-new-birth-control-rule-.html


Maybe vasectomies aren't turning up in the coverage so much because unwanted pregnancies affect the woman far more (especially from the health point of view), so people are concentrating on the health choices the woman makes.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
47. No and it's kind of sad that it isn't
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 08:22 AM
Feb 2012

I knew at a young age I didn't want to have children. It was my personal decision. Some people consider that crazy. I know I don't have the patients to be a parent and made the decision to prevent that from ever happening. Not everyone is meant to have children. There are plenty of other things you can do with you life besides that. I've traveled around the world and have lived and worked in 2 different countries and am working on doctoral. Again I'm not saying having children is right or wrong, but should be taken as a personal choice and responsibility.

Response to ibegurpard (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»why aren't vasectomies co...