General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswhy aren't vasectomies controversial?
As to whether they are covered by insurance (religious institution-provided or not) I do not know. You just never hear this being discussed in terms of morality.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... tampons would be free."
trumad
(41,692 posts)you can have an abortion at Texaco.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)Man up, men!
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)and what's the procedure where women get their tubes tied called? Why aren't these procedures slammed on like other methods of birth control?
Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,271 posts)Humanae Vitae:
http://catholic.christianityinview.com/morals.html
Like other methods of birth control, typical Catholics pay no attention to this. But the Bishops hate it just as much as the pill, IUDs etc.
CTyankee
(63,892 posts)oh, wait....
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)ban on tubal litigation or vasectomy. Trust me, as a mother of six (all dearly wanted buy the way!), I got a thing or two to tell you about bodily mutilation!
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Liquorice
(2,066 posts)any headline about the debate over birth control being covered. Viagra is widely used as a recreational drug as well, and apparently the Catholic church has no objections at all to that.
In Foster Friess time, maybe women held aspirin between their knees for contraception, but old men who couldn't get it up anymore had to stop having sex. Now these men pop a pill covered by insurance, while women are still holding the aspirin between their knees.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)Response to Liquorice (Reply #27)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Edweird
(8,570 posts)it's still a bargain. I am more than happy to pay in full, in cash. As far as 'controversy' goes, I couldn't possibly care less one way or the other. I do as I choose.
safeinOhio
(32,641 posts)Mine caused some unexpected consequences that I now suffer.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)PM me if you aren't comfortable using the forum.
BOHICA12
(471 posts)clipped, tied, and fried for 20 years here.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... it's only been 36 years.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I had mine about 14 years ago and have never had a problem.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)I'm fine with it either way. I'll gladly pay the 6-something or happily pay a co-pay.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)It was below three hundred when I had mine. Get some icepacks. You'll need them for about a week due to blueballs.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)But men making choices has always been OK. That is, as long as they aren't gay men, of course.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)LOL!
handmade34
(22,756 posts)because men control it...
SammyWinstonJack
(44,129 posts)WillowTree
(5,325 posts)Neither is approved of.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)saras
(6,670 posts)The ONE place vasectomies are controversial are when a guy lies about having one, and the courts say tough shit, lady.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)I've heard of countless times, even in this "modern" age, of release forms needing to be signed by husbands prior to a woman getting a hysterectomy.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)his LIVE-IN GIRLFRIEND'S signature. He tried before they lived together and doctors behind the Orange Curtain wouldn't - so she moved in and signed the papers. This was just a few years ago - since 2000.
NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)And when I inquired why that was the case I was told it was that way because of the Catholic Church.
Don
treestar
(82,383 posts)What's strange is, they feel the need to try to make it hard to pay for the procedure, as though they cannot trust people, even Catholics, not to get them because they are supposed to be wrong under their religious tenets.
phylny
(8,368 posts)and we paid it gladly.
I would have happily had a tubal, but our baby was born at a Catholic hospital. My OBGYN (a man) told me, "Have your husband get a vasectomy. It's cheaper and safer." So we did.
I always thought it was stupid for insurance companies not to cover birth control or sterilization, since less kids meant less to cover, but what do I know?
Rex
(65,616 posts)Women are still very far away from reaching the goal of equality and many a man 'in power' knows that and wants to delay that from happening for as long as possible. Whenever I use the PTB it does not include any woman I can think of in that institutionalized, power-control structure. Women have not 'made it' there yet, maybe simply for the reason it would be new competition IOW bad for business for a Good O Boys club.
People sometimes assume women have made it in the M$M, but they were all hired by men. If women controlled the media (which to do so they would have to control many other things first) you might see vasectomies more in the news. I doubt it and we will never know. All we can do is speculate how things would be.
Another reason, men control everything.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)There are quite a few men who get reversals and have more kids in the super-duper fundie crowd.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Should be equally "sinful" as birth control.
Missy Vixen
(16,207 posts)Vasectomies are also typically not a topic of conversation among anyone else but spouses.
IMHO.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)So check with your insurance company as to whether it is covered.
My recollection (now dim and hazy) is that it was not covered. (Although maybe it was below the deductible -- back then health insurance was insurance for large, unexpected expenses, rather than prepaid routine medical care.)
Cherchez la Femme
(2,488 posts)Because it's the man's choice -- it's the man's control.
Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)by the Catholic church. Actually, the mother-in-law was excommunicated as well. This was here north of Denver about 40 years ago. So the priests move at a glacial pace, but maybe they have moved a bit on this one subject...because they don't seem to be making a big deal out of this being such a big sin anymore or over insurance covering this procedure. But give the old farts a couple of minutes to think about it, and they'll start another battle on this issue and make it another war against women vicariously through men.
I consider my own husband's vasectomy as our final decision on our family planning to be a major win for my own (womanly) health and the hubby agreed - that is why he went through it even though he would rather have his fingernails pulled out than to see a doctor for anything especially about THAT
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)they are all focused on post conception birth control
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)especially if the reason FOR the sterilization is because another pregnancy for the woman is life-threatening, it makes sense to take the easiest route..
Truth-be-told, many men are still not willing to do it, so the woman has to have a tubal ligation.
I don't know if it's different these days, but it used to be an office visit sort of thing, with some discomfort for a while, but not as big of a deal or as expensive as surgery on the woman.,
muriel_volestrangler
(101,271 posts)There seems to be an assumption in this thread that they do. I have seen no evidence for that; but people seem to be ignoring either examples where vasectomies were condemned by the church (eg #40), or quotes that they are 'forbidden' (eg #15). Here's another:
Banned services include contraception (including so-called morning-after drugs), sterilization (such as fallopian tubectomy or vasectomy), artificial insemination, surrogate motherhood and abortion (under any circumstances).
http://www.kjonline.com/news/Maine-diocese-leading-fight-against-new-birth-control-rule-.html
Maybe vasectomies aren't turning up in the coverage so much because unwanted pregnancies affect the woman far more (especially from the health point of view), so people are concentrating on the health choices the woman makes.
pstokely
(10,523 posts)nt
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I knew at a young age I didn't want to have children. It was my personal decision. Some people consider that crazy. I know I don't have the patients to be a parent and made the decision to prevent that from ever happening. Not everyone is meant to have children. There are plenty of other things you can do with you life besides that. I've traveled around the world and have lived and worked in 2 different countries and am working on doctoral. Again I'm not saying having children is right or wrong, but should be taken as a personal choice and responsibility.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)and then the liquid valium kicked in and i stopped argueing
Response to ibegurpard (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed