Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
with everything else going on, did I miss the dem males in congress raising their voices against (Original Post) niyad Feb 2012 OP
Sen Frank Lautenberg from NJ Kber Feb 2012 #1
thank you--I was hoping that the men were actually speaking out niyad Feb 2012 #3
at least one male dem rep walked out of the hearing in protest. eom ellenfl Feb 2012 #4
It'd be derided as "mansplaining" and he'd be called a "fauxminist" lumberjack_jeff Feb 2012 #2
Not by all.... Lars39 Feb 2012 #6
Certainly. My employer has no business making my medical/ethical decisions for me. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2012 #7
Right now we need every warm body to protest this crap. Lars39 Feb 2012 #8
Here's one from the chopped liver brigade. Zalatix Feb 2012 #5
Turning the tables often works Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2012 #10
I don't know, but that was a travesty. Rex Feb 2012 #9

Kber

(5,043 posts)
1. Sen Frank Lautenberg from NJ
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 01:40 PM
Feb 2012

decried the "male-a-garchy" of the hearing. I took note of that since he's one of my senators.

Others have spoken out, but they aren't getting the press. The media would LIKE to cast this as "just" a women's issue and including the male voices that have indeed spoken out ruins their story line.

http://prochoicenc.wordpress.com/2012/02/09/identifying-male-a-garchy/

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
2. It'd be derided as "mansplaining" and he'd be called a "fauxminist"
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 01:55 PM
Feb 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002324451

Better to let the women such as Pelosi take point on this, they're doing fine.
 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
7. Certainly. My employer has no business making my medical/ethical decisions for me.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:14 PM
Feb 2012

"freedom of religion" doesn't mean freedom of religions to coerce me to obey them.

The catholic church would deny insurance coverage for vasectomies too (if in fact they are covered under HCR at all).

There are some who think their activism is diluted if they accept men as allies.

 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
5. Here's one from the chopped liver brigade.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:03 PM
Feb 2012

I may not be a Congresscritter but I vote and I didn't hear my Democrat rep speaking out.

Having an all-male Congressional panel (or all-female, but I doubt that has ever happened) on anything is intolerable. Having one on women's health is beyond outrageous.

Perhaps this should be presented as "what if it was an all-woman panel discussing men's health"? That would wake up a few men in a hurry.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
10. Turning the tables often works
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 03:43 PM
Feb 2012

One of the colleges I taught at had no women on its counseling staff. The women faculty complained about it in one faculty meeting, saying that women students were coming to them with personal problems that they didn't feel qualified to handle.

The faculty men and the president started harumphing to the effect of, "Don't you think our counselors are competent?"

One of the women stood up and addressed the harumphers:"When you were 18, would you have gone to a woman to talk about your most intimate problems?"

Crickets.

By the beginning of the next semester, the college had a woman counselor.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»with everything else goin...