Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:31 PM Feb 2012

NOT A PNAC MOMENT - Syria intervention 'very difficult': top US general

WASHINGTON — The top US military officer warned Sunday that intervention in Syria would be "very difficult" and said it would be "premature" to arm the besieged country's opposition movement.

"It's premature to take a decision to arm the opposition movement in Syria because I would challenge anyone to identify for me the opposition movement in Syria at this point," Dempsey said in an interview.

"There's indications that Al-Qaeda is involved and that they're interested in supporting the opposition. I mean there's a number of players, all of whom are trying to reinforce their particular side of this issue.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gpTd-x9khTqi02eCbzfjMAoiVWJg?docId=CNG.845ffbfe45fb932b86d45d73a66f28f0.a1

EXCUSE MY FRENCH - BUT WHERE THE F*CK is there anything about the US SIDING WITH AL QAEDA as claimed elsewhere. The US would not be so stupid as to send drones into Pakistan to fight Al Qaeda where they are riling up the population, and support Al Qaeda in Syria. What utter horseBS.


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NOT A PNAC MOMENT - Syria intervention 'very difficult': top US general (Original Post) tabatha Feb 2012 OP
regarding the next to last sentence, the US WOULD be so stupid...lol msongs Feb 2012 #1
That is our pattern...friends one day, enemies the next, friends 10 years later Rex Feb 2012 #2
Actually, it depends on who is in charge. tabatha Feb 2012 #4
True, at least Obama stays on target. Rex Feb 2012 #5
I think this is the response to the letter sent by the Neocons to Obama. tabatha Feb 2012 #3

msongs

(67,361 posts)
1. regarding the next to last sentence, the US WOULD be so stupid...lol
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:34 PM
Feb 2012

"The US would not be so stupid as to send drones into Pakistan to fight Al Qaeda where they are riling up the population, and support Al Qaeda in Syria."

We have to keep the drones manufacturers rolling in billions of war profit. That's the mission of our military these days.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
2. That is our pattern...friends one day, enemies the next, friends 10 years later
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:34 PM
Feb 2012

depending on which way the money train is going.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
4. Actually, it depends on who is in charge.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:46 PM
Feb 2012

The neocons were in charge when Syria was a friend. There is a BBC online article today about the Canadian guy that was sent to be tortured in Syria by the Bush admin.

I think the Bush admin would be stupid enough to be inconsistent - but I think Obama is better.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
5. True, at least Obama stays on target.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:50 PM
Feb 2012

IF that was not true imo, we would already be hip deep in Iran or Syria.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
3. I think this is the response to the letter sent by the Neocons to Obama.
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 02:44 PM
Feb 2012

Which means that the military is not under neocon command anymore.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NOT A PNAC MOMENT - Syria...