Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 08:31 PM Jul 2013

Internal EPA Report Conflicts with Agency’s Stance on Fracking Contamination in Pennsylvania Town

Officially, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said last year that the drinking water in Dimock, Pennsylvania, was not contaminated by natural gas extraction involving hydraulic fracturing (fracking). However, an internal EPA document obtained by the media contradicts this assertion, raising questions over why officials declared the water was safe to drink.

Residents of Dimock had complained for years that nearby gas drilling had polluted their wells. These complaints prompted the EPA’s mid-Atlantic field office to test the water for 64 homes.

Agency leaders in Washington later announced that nearly all of the samples came out clean.

But an EPA PowerPoint presentation obtained by the Tribune/Los Angeles Times Washington Bureau reveals that EPA on-site staff members informed its Washington headquarters that several wells had been contaminated with methane, manganese and arsenic, and that gas drilling was the likely culprit. The determination was based on studies conducted over the course of a four- to five-year period at the site.

The document concluded that “methane and other gases released during drilling (including air from the drilling) apparently cause significant damage to the water quality.” The presentation also stated that “methane is at significantly higher concentrations in the aquifers after gas drilling and perhaps as a result of fracking (hydraulic fracturing) and other gas well work.”


http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/internal-epa-report-conflicts-with-agencys-stance-on-fracking-contamination-in-pennsylvania-town-130731?news=850736

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Internal EPA Report Conflicts with Agency’s Stance on Fracking Contamination in Pennsylvania Town (Original Post) The Straight Story Jul 2013 OP
Yes, but rich people are getting richer from fracking, so shoosh! nt valerief Jul 2013 #1
So who or what entity put pressure on who? NCarolinawoman Jul 2013 #2
Must be that the Republicans now own the Oval Office, truedelphi Aug 2013 #4
Exactly what I expect from the bush* administration. Wilms Jul 2013 #3

NCarolinawoman

(2,825 posts)
2. So who or what entity put pressure on who?
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 08:41 PM
Jul 2013

Once the damage to the aquifers is done, there is no going back. This is downright evil!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Internal EPA Report Confl...