General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInternal EPA Report Conflicts with Agency’s Stance on Fracking Contamination in Pennsylvania Town
Officially, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said last year that the drinking water in Dimock, Pennsylvania, was not contaminated by natural gas extraction involving hydraulic fracturing (fracking). However, an internal EPA document obtained by the media contradicts this assertion, raising questions over why officials declared the water was safe to drink.
Residents of Dimock had complained for years that nearby gas drilling had polluted their wells. These complaints prompted the EPAs mid-Atlantic field office to test the water for 64 homes.
Agency leaders in Washington later announced that nearly all of the samples came out clean.
But an EPA PowerPoint presentation obtained by the Tribune/Los Angeles Times Washington Bureau reveals that EPA on-site staff members informed its Washington headquarters that several wells had been contaminated with methane, manganese and arsenic, and that gas drilling was the likely culprit. The determination was based on studies conducted over the course of a four- to five-year period at the site.
The document concluded that methane and other gases released during drilling (including air from the drilling) apparently cause significant damage to the water quality. The presentation also stated that methane is at significantly higher concentrations in the aquifers after gas drilling and perhaps as a result of fracking (hydraulic fracturing) and other gas well work.
http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/internal-epa-report-conflicts-with-agencys-stance-on-fracking-contamination-in-pennsylvania-town-130731?news=850736
valerief
(53,235 posts)NCarolinawoman
(2,825 posts)Once the damage to the aquifers is done, there is no going back. This is downright evil!
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Or else Big Energy does.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Oh. Wait.
Oops.