Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Sometimes K&R is not enough
Read the New Yorker article. It's a nice attempt to nail at least some of this jello to the wall.
It is lovely to know that "we don't spy on Americans" involves a definition of a foreigner for internet surveillance (with some content, BTW) of “In direct contact w/tgt overseas, no info to show proposed tgt in U.S.”
“In direct contact w/tgt overseas, no info to show proposed tgt in U.S.”
As opposed to, say, "info to show proposed target is outside the U.S."
First cousin to: "well, there was no info to show they didn't have drugs somewhere in their car."